NCAA Corruption Investigation - Kansas Identified?



  • @kjayhawks That’s basically based on them submitting transcripts, checking boxes and then literally, saying you didn’t accept any money.

    I was cleared in less than two weeks when I applied in HS. Kind of a joke tbh.



  • @BeddieKU23 Duke, UK and Bama almost HAVE to sit those guys now right?



  • Kcmatt7 said:

    @BeddieKU23 Duke, UK and Bama almost HAVE to sit those guys now right?

    Bill/KU would. Doesn’t mean others will do the right thing.



  • So Izzo had dinners with Dawkins and potentially multiple players paid. I really thought he was clean.



  • @dylans Bill has over and over when any question arises. Even when Bragg was innocent last season, he sat him.



  • @Kcmatt7 The NCAA should ONLY be a governing body and a regulator to the P5. But right now they are making money off of all these athletes. That’s the problem. If any of these schools are punished, then it will have a negative effect on the NCAA bottom line.

    I am 100% behind the P5 leaving the NCAA in the dust, but I do think there would need to be a separate governing body (that does not profit from the schools) to regulate.



  • @BShark link?



  • Kcmatt7 said:

    @BShark link?

    It’s in the Yahoo story. Also “Villanova coaches” that one doesn’t shock me one bit…



  • So we have a date of Feb 1 2016 for the Apples advance of 1,700. He was an unsigned prospect at the time. He did not sign with KU until the spring.



  • @mihawk I think it would be an organization comprised of the 100 schools. Basically, what I would envision, a Senate style of deal. Every school has 1 representative. They decide things based on votes. Every school has equal say. No separate TV deals like the LH Network. A United Athletics Programs of America. This will come after the Declaration of NCAAdependece is written. The NCAA will attempt to stop this by declaring war and cutting off supplies sent to the schools. Only to find that the schools, by bonding together, became stronger than the British, I mean NCAA.

    They do say history repeats itself…



  • Jared Jefferies hasn’t been in college in 15 years and he’s on the report. This is comical that the FBI is connected to a potential NCAA amateurism question involving an athlete taking a loan for as little as $71.39.

    So…that uhhh Texas Tech game should be pretty good tomorrow. It’s nice that KU is on gameday for the 2nd week in a row and we’ll get to see Jay-Will superman that KU blue and shortly follow with flock of boo birds.



  • @BShark I thought Jay was clean. However, his recent success has been unprecedented.

    I thought Izzo was clean until last week with the other scandal. Now, this is making a lot of sense. He got tired of being a bad recruiter… His recruiting did pick up a ton lately and I always wondered how. Figured Nike was paying players to go. Now the picture is becoming more clear. His legacy will likely be tarnished. I don’t expect him back at MSU next season at this point.



  • BeddieKU23 said:

    So we have a date of Feb 1 2016 for the Apples advance of 1,700. He was an unsigned prospect at the time. He did not sign with KU until the spring.

    Correct.



  • Kcmatt7 said:

    @BShark I thought Jay was clean. However, his recent success has been unprecedented.

    I thought Izzo was clean until last week with the other scandal. Now, this is making a lot of sense. He got tired of being a bad recruiter… His recruiting did pick up a ton lately and I always wondered how. Figured Nike was paying players to go. Now the picture is becoming more clear. His legacy will likely be tarnished. I don’t expect him back at MSU next season at this point.

    Izzo might just be Pitino mk 2.



  • Talk from other sites. - - Our consecutive conference Championships is jeopardy possibly?





  • @jayballer73 highly doubtful if this is all they have on us. The sum of money is fairly small and it would be hard for KU or even Jackson himself to have knowledge of this. The NCAA can’t expect the players parents to hand over all there bank statements and pay check stub from before the kids are even committed.



  • @kjayhawks Clearing house decisions before new info comes are irrelevant. Ask Cal.



  • When a player with Markell Fultz’ ability signs with Washington red flags should be raised immediately. I don’t know much about him, but I just think that’s evidence that something strange went down.



  • Paying players would make no difference because players can still be tempted by more outside money. They should simply let players have nonexclusive contacts with agents and loans (to be reported to the NCAA) that can be disavowed if said agent doesn’t get the player X amount upon leaving school or within a year, say. And pass an actual law providing for criminal penalties for anyone seeking to induce a player or family member to sign a nonreported contract.

    Open contracting like that will run the shady characters out quickly.



  • @wissox or when a players parent is “running their recruitment” all it means to me is that they are taking payments and the highest bidder is where they end up.

    That is what worries me about JJ the most. I just hope we don’t hear of a Kansas coach being involved. We can’t help that we are such a good program that people pay players to come here.

    Of course, that is probably a bit of an ignorant thought on my end. It will all come down to the levels of deniability. I just hope we don’t hear about Self going to dinner with agents.



  • @mayjay great ideas. That is exactly what they need to do. Find a way to create transparency and crush anyone who does things behind closed doors.



  • mayjay said:

    Paying players would make no difference because players can still be tempted by more outside money. They should simply let players have nonexclusive contacts with agents and loans (to be reported to the NCAA) that can be disavowed if said agent doesn’t get the player X amount upon leaving school or within a year, say. And pass an actual law providing for criminal penalties for anyone seeking to induce a player or family member to sign a nonreported contract.

    Open contracting like that will run the shady characters out quickly.

    Pretty great idea.



  • @Kcmatt7 It perhaps could work even better if they guaranteed NCAA immunity to any player who reported shady inducements. Use the players as confid sources rather than punishing them if they self report going to dinner with a crook who paid for it.

    I’d much rather have the chance to catch the illegal hunter than simply making sure no one gets his target.



  • @BShark That Deadspin Article is exactly how I feel about this. FBI is trying to shake more things out.

    I think the NCAA is more in damage control mode than they are attack mode lol.

    Someone in that office is running around “WHO TIPPED THE FBI OFF?! Son of B. Sht Sht Sh*t. How are we going to spin this? How are we going to fix this?”

    There is no way the NCAA wanted the FBI to do this. This puts way too much pressure on the NCAA to investigate 100 programs and dole out fair punishments to all of them without pissing off one school because they got a harsher penalty than another. It’ll be 10 years before they get to the bottom of all of this too more than likely.



  • A couple of interesting items. Did anyone notice the headers on the spreadsheet are in what I would call Spanglish or a combination of English and Spanish and one of the headers indicates “Cambios de los Accountants” which in correct Spanish would be “Cambios de los Contadores” and “Presentado en Espana” or “Presented in Spain”? This typically happens when someone in a Spanish speaking country uses software written in a English. Could this be loans originated in Spain for players playing in Europe?

    More importantly, if schools were not aware of these monies changing hands, can they be held legally responsible/liable? Seems like an extreme reach to me.

    Now, the NCAA is a different beast and it can directly benefit from fines it can issue to big programs for whom a few million would not be much of a hardship. I see a big ammnesty coming to programs that were not blatantly involved. If this does not happen, I can see a s enario where the 5 big conferences leave the NCAA and start a new and more college friendly sports association.

    Maybe this is what it takes to spur the NBA to ditch the OAD and adopt the baseball model.

    Paying students that already receive free tuition, room and board and access to the best coaches, trainers and facilities and national exposure, for academic performance is silly. It would grossly discriminate against the rest of students that not only don’t get these benefits but have to pay for the privilege and patiently wait until graduation to collect the benefits of the education. I guess this makes me old school…😄



  • @mayjay Something like that might work. They need to change the culture before they change anything else.



  • @JayHawkFanToo The free market indicates they are worth more than that. We need to just eliminate OAD. Let the top players that want to get paid go get paid immediately.



  • @JayHawkFanToo Loans more likely to have originated in places like Colombia or Mexico or even Russia. Huge caches of cash (couldn’t resist) tend to flow along the same paths as other untraceable commodities, and seem to implicate organized crime involvement.

    Gad, I hope there isn’t any gambling investigation going on simultaneously!



  • They should just cancel the entire season today. All records to date stand. KU 14 straight conference championships!



  • @mayjay

    We are talking about piddly amounts of money. Yes, the multimillion operations operate that way but we are talking about low 4 figure payments here.



  • @BShark

    Except colleges are not or should not be places where athletes go to sell their wares to the highest bidder. Colleges are and should be places where individuals go to get an education first and foremost. Like I said, I am old fashioned this way.



  • JayHawkFanToo said:

    @mayjay

    We are talking about piddly amounts of money. Yes, the multimillion operations operate that way but we are talking about low 4 figure payments here.

    That you know of, in one sport. And in that particular sport, don’t you think organized crime, trying to take over gambling in the most heavily bet 3 week period of the year, as well as all these NBA players with all their games, would drool at the chance to get leverage over the players any way possible?

    Aside: Can’t wait for the shareholder actions if the big corps get in stock-tumbling trouble.



  • As I think on this more, that might be the NCAA’s out: investigate whether this affected the integrity of the games, and if not then announce new rules following a big, “Whew!”



  • @JayHawkFanToo This effects the NBA exactly 0 amount. The only thing that would make them adopt the baseball model is on court performance, player development (or lack there of), and ROI.

    Why would the NBA change the rule because of this?

    Now, I’m not in favor of paying players, but only because then we would have to pay all NCAA athletes. And that makes no sense to me. And I think it would bankrupt athletics departments all over the country.

    However, I am in favor of creating a private organization that licenses out the names of universities, “rents” their facilities and pays players. The players would also have the option of applying the funds they receive to a reduced tuition rate at that school instead of receiving their entire salary in cash.



  • @Kcmatt7

    In that case why even pretend it is a college team? Let’s just call it what it would be, a school sponsored professional team.



  • Maybe I’m misreading the big picture… but to me, the implication in all of this is that the NCAA has more responsibility than they can govern, rules that they are ineffective at enforcing consistently, and are therefore a feckless institution.

    At first glance this is bad for CBB; but with a deeper look, I think our gaze has to be fixed on the NCAA.



  • @BShark maybe that 2700 was tied to MSU



  • Crimsonorblue22 said:

    @BShark maybe that 2700 was tied to MSU

    The loan advance was given to her allegedly about a week after he visited KU. Jackson visited KU officially in late January. He visited Michigan St the first week of March. Visited Arizona in December 2015.



  • One thing is apparent, at least on these payments. They do not appear to have been done with the intention of swaying prospects to specific programs but to specific agents/agencies instead, after their college careers are over.



  • @BeddieKU23 so, what do u think?



  • Crimsonorblue22 said:

    @BeddieKU23 so, what do u think?

    I don’t think the advance has anything to do with the schools. I just wanted to provide the info about when Josh made his 3 official visits in case that came up.

    I do think the agents were after his mom to secure him for the future.

    Imagine how many other sports agency firms out there have similar spreadsheets that weren’t caught…



  • @JayHawkFanToo Why are we pretending it isn’t that right now? You have even been one of the people saying that they think these charges are a stretch. If they don’t stick, what is going to keep players from taking the biggest paydays they possibly can from here on out?

    Why do you want to continue to force athletes to go to school when that only brings down that academic standards that colleges are supposed to uphold?

    Professional sports are using colleges. Colleges should turn the table and use the platform they have established, and are forced to have by profiting from it as much as possible.



  • How many many of these cases wouldn’t have happened if the stupid OAD rule wasn’t in place. You’re asking kids that think they are just there for a pit stop to play by the same rules that don’t care as much about the school or what happens when they leave.



  • @Buster-1926 Could be.

    Maybe you are on to something though.

    Conspiracy theory: FBI could be attempting to overthrow the NCAA and NCAA is too dumb to realize it is happening. Make the NCAA look like idiots and the bad guy. This forces schools to quit hiding their athletics department under the umbrella of a nonprofit and turns them into private organizations is potentially billions in tax revenue per year. Not to mention the double-taxation of athletes being paid in the light of day instead of behind closed doors.

    Genius if this is what is actually going on.



  • @Buster-1926 The incompetence at the NCAA makes the Feds look like geniuses…



  • Kcmatt7 said:

    They need to make it an environment that players and parents don’t feel like they need to go to agents to get extra cash. I’m not sure exactly how to do that, but there are brighter minds than me that could help to solve the problem.

    You realize the NFL is in the same tax category as the NCAA. If they were going to go after anyone in this category it be the NFL. CRAZY $$$$ there. Of course the NCAA may be easier to nab.



  • I know we are worried about the possible implications for KU in all this. So far we know of two former players linked to the report.

    But imagine being Kentucky, Michigan St, Alabama, Duke with current players listed. What do they do… Do they sit them in fear or play them. I’m sure each school is furiously vetting the situation. We are talking the leading scorers for Michigan St, Kentucky & Alabama & one of Duke’s starters.

    This will be interesting to see if all are held out because they are all now aware of what they might not have been aware of before…



  • @BigBad NFL gave up tax-exempt status. And the feds are still getting player income tax and the individual teams income. They do not get taxes from individual schools or the scholarships students are paid in from colleges. Which is a much bigger pie than anything else out there right now. Think about ten thousand kids. Think 100 athletic programs making tens of millions in profit.

    The FBI wouldn’t be going after the NCAA’s money. They would be going after individual schools athletic programs money. Money that could be touched if they became 100% private, non-sheltered entities.



  • @Kcmatt7

    I am all for doing way with the OAD rule. I am in favor that if a college is going to spend a ton of money on a player, it should have some assurances he will stick around for at least 3 years.

    Also, if colleges are the victims, it should be a civil and not a criminal matter.