HOW BILL SOLVED THE RUBIK'S CUBE
-
@elpoyo Newsflash - You may have missed this in the Flint hill poop
mountains of manhattan or the cave dwellings of misery but HCBS DID win a NC in 2008. Sorry 
life is so tough under those dirty ol’ rocks without sunlight.
-
@elpoyo You are exactly right. Nothing can be deemed “solved” until he delivers the national championship. Period. We are now nearly 10 years past his first one. It’s time.
-
@elpoyo I know it’s hard for a CNN reporter to grasp, but I was talking about next year’s team. Come back at the end of next year, and we’ll see if my positive vision wins, or your gutter sniping wins out.
-
I sense a connection between you and @elpoyo…any chance he is your alter ego? A sycophant?
-
@JayHawkFanToo There’s more than one alter on here for sure bro. Without a doubt.
-
@HighEliteMajor We’re just in terrible shape, aren’t we?
-
Earth to @elpoyo - Mario made the shot!
-
JayHawkFanToo No, I just thinks it’s pathetic that every time the guy posts something, it’s always the same attacks. That’s a much greater reflection on those that think they’re cute attacking a reasonable point. Look at the garbage from @globaljaybird.
@KUSTEVE Of course, no one said we’re in bad shape. Problem talking titles and real achievement?
What do UNC, Duke, UK, UConn, Nova, Louisville have in common? Right. All have rings since we won ours. Except three of those have won two titles since we’ve won ours. Tourney is all luck though, right?
-
@HighEliteMajor careful! Saying it’s all luck will get you in trouble! Lol
We can’t hang on to 08 forever, even though it was perhaps our best KU hoops memory. Sooner or later, Self will need to get the job done again. Can’t keep making excuses - at some point we need results.
-
I don’t have a problem with @elpoyo posting his hate for KU. Yes he’s never made one positive comment about KU.
I just wish he would announce the real team/school he loves.
By all means come talk and play the game, but at least be fair and tell us real KU fans who you root for.
I don’t know about other KU fans but I have a hard time taking someone seriously when they claim they are KU fan, yet they never have anything positive to say.
Smells like a troll to me. In fact smells like a Missouri fan to me. Yet all I ask is tell me who you really root for, and then lets have the conversation or debate.
I think it’s fair enough.
-
Come on @HighEliteMajor, we both know that @elpoyo comes to this board only occasionally and mostly to make outrageous statements and to get a reaction.
Now, you are a smart fellow…are you saying the the NCAA does not involve a fair amount of luck? If you say no, you are being disingenuous.
Also, how is it A coaches fault when he has a good game plan and the team picks the wrong time to have an off game? Take the last game of the season against Oregon, KU shot 5 of 25 or 20% from the 3 point, 4 of 10 or 40% in the first half and a putrid 1 of 15 or 6.67% in the second half. When is the last time the team shot so poorly from the 3?..and most of the misses were not even contested shots but wide open ones that the various players made routinely during the season…how is this Coach Self’s fault? I am sure that if Coach Self could have played he would have shot better than that.
I have always maintained that if from the Elite 8 forward the format is switched to 2 of 3 or 3 of 5 the end result would be quite different. KU probably does not win in 1988 but likely wins at least 2 or 3 more titles in other years, maybe even this past season.
By the way, one man’ garbage is another man’s treasure.
-
@HighEliteMajor Glad you’re back once again joining in the pathetic fun. I’ll wager Elpoyo really missed your hiatus.Yee haw boys sic em
-
@JayHawkFanToo it’s never the coach, yet his teams, which means different players same result, keep having their worst offensive performance of the year in the elite eight. 07, 08, 11, 16 and 17. We got fortunate in 08. You know why they played better in 2012 in the elite eight? They weren’t tight. When Bill doesn’t feel tight, his team isn’t tight. Those terrible performances keep happening for a reason. Maybe this year will be different…
-
@JayHawkFanToo Flattery is always good
for soothing a bruised ego …
-
@globaljaybird I didn’t say it was fun, just pathetic.
@JayHawkFanToo Every basketball game entails a “fair amount” of luck. So that really means nothing. I know we disagree on the “luck” factor in the NCAA tourney. A matter of degrees separate our perspectives. Folks that favor a coach’s perspective tend to be more in the “luck” camp. Those that tend to be more critical of coaches tend to be more in the “less luck” camp.
The tourney results speak for themselves and prove that great teams and programs win titles, with few exceptions. In the last 9 seasons, Duke, UNC, and UK account for 5 titles. And KU won the title the year before that, and Florida had gone back to back preceding KU, and UNC won in 2005, UConn 2004, etc. It’s a large amount of other stuff, beyond “luck.” When we win the next title, the narrative changes. If we win this season, suddenly we’ve won 2 titles in 11 seasons. It’s that sudden. But we have to win it. I defend @elpoyo because of the lack of civility of those who respond to him – meaning personal attacks.
We are national title deficient among blue bloods, and it is always a burr in the saddle. We went 20 years without one, now have gone another 10. I, like others, grow tired of the fawning over Big 12 titles. It’s not a substitute for the ultimate prize.
@DoubleDD Some people may be fans, but may only see the negative, or may only choose to comment when something irritates them. That doesn’t mean they are not a fan of the KU or the program. It may be annoying. Some folks think everything that can go wrong, will go wrong – and some are right (see the MU fan base). And all of the fatalists that get anxious at the start of every NCAA tourney, that somehow, someway, we’ll lose before our seed line, have only been wrong a few times since Bill Self took over (Self’s regular season success raising that tourney bar, of course).
-
@JayHawkFanToo If the Elite 8 losses are bad luck, explain why KU has had their lowest scoring game in that round in 5 of those 7 games. That’s not bad luck, that’s a trend.
-
I’m curious. It was said when HCBS is tight his teams play tight. Is there a source we can go to that will tell us his level of tightness prior to a game so that we may prepare ourselves by lowering our level of expectation thereby reducing our anxiety level? Perhaps an unknown location on the KU Athletics website that receives data packets from a unit attached to his sphincter. I know my heart would appreciate such info.
-
It’s more just watching, especially how they shoot on the offensive end. You can tell the team is pressing in certain games, trying to make plays out of nothing. Against Purdue, KU was drilling shots, laughing and smiling, having a great time just playing ball. Against Oregon, they looked like they were locked in a phone booth with a tiger. That’s visible in their play.
-
Whether he choked the first two Elite 8 flameouts is debatable. But after that the monkey has been on his back, EVERYONE feels the pressure.
Next year, he needs to come out and run about 10 set plays in a row. Nothing that the other team could have scouted that entire week. Throw off the other coach and team and then lets get into our normal flow. Or even come out in a zone or something.
Either way, the psychology behind it is interesting. We are expected to win that game. So instead of being excited like most elite 8 teams, we come out scared. We have pressure most other teams don’t. But, it comes with the Blue Blood territory.
-
I actually think he needs less structure in the Elite Eight. Let the guys go play ball. Self seems to want to control every aspect of the outcome in big games, rather than letting the talent on his team decide the outcome. If you say to guys, hey, I trust you - go play our game, they can relax and play ball. If you tighten up, they do too because they are trying to avoid mistakes.
-
Better competition? You can look at any data and come up with all kinds of trend and coincidences, most of which don’t mean a thing.
Have you ever read the list of similarities between Lincoln and Kennedy? At first sight it seems hard to believe that there could be so many coincidences but when you look at it in more detail it is really not that big of a deal and a number of coincidences can be found for any two people and it has even been debunked by Snopes.
Likewise, you can take any number of stats and arrange them to fit any desired outcome. Remember what Will Rogers said…there are lies, damn lies and statistics.
-
@HighEliteMajor the problem is when the only measure used is a national title, then you miss the genius of bringing in experienced players in order to prevent a full rebuild year. Now, if I had posed the initial question of : “will the 3 transfers lead us to the national title”??? then I would understand el putrid’s stupidity, and blatant attack ( for the 10,000th time) on our program. Here is the definition of what el putrid did:
In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal, on-topic discussion,[3] often for the troll’s amusement.
See how the entire gist of the thread went from complimenting Coach Self on his transfers, to running down Coach Self for not winning more national titles?
-
@justanotherfan I thought he did that this last year. And our guards minus Frank all got tight. DG passed up several open 3s he took all season long.
-
@KUSTEVE No one said the “only measure” – it is, however, the “ultimate” prize. You can see the difference, right? One can appreciate and enjoy what we have done, but be extremely dissatisfied by our lagging behind the other blue bloods on national titles.
But now you criticize @elpoyo because, in your opinion, he didn’t respond either directly to your topic or in the manner you preferred (suggesting “stupidity”)? You said Self solved something. @elpoyo said until we win a title, we can’t say anything is solved. He’s right.
I’ve posted enough threads that change or morph into something not intended. It happens. It’s discussion. But the NC issue seems a reasonable tangent here.
@brooksmd It is legendary that Bill Self appears tight in tourney games. Much comment on that. Vs. Oregon, I recall both Newell and Tait posting on twitter that Self seemed relaxed. I buy that that. He seemed more relaxed all season to me. I guess my take is that there was nothing vs. Oregon that I saw that might create tightness. Other times, when he was ranting and flopping, and all that stuff we’ve seen, maybe more so.
Most of the time, though, as @justanotherfan referenced, a team reflects the coach much of the time. I do think that feeling prepared, have answers to the opposition (which we didn’t have vs. Nova), can help there. Jay Wright had a plan; we adjusted; Wright countered. And it ended there. That might tighten up a player a big – when they’re jumping our hand-offs, preventing normal entry passes, etc.
-
@JayHawkFanToo Bill Self has coached in 4 Final Four games, that’s supposed to be even better competition than the Elite 8, yet KU hasn’t had the scoring issues in those rounds they’ve had in the Elite 8.
You can try and justify it however you want, but it doesn’t change the reality that when KU reaches the Elite 8 (50% of the time under Self), the odds say KU is going have their worst scoring game of the season that night.
-
@KUSTEVE All it takes to start a pissing match is one d@%k… or who knows what else it may prefer? Anyway, that’s the kinda stuff they expect on the old site - El poyo trollo has a track record that belongs anywhere else, not here. And he even has a buddy or two doesn’t he? Absence doesn’t always make the heart grow fonder …
-
the off-season is too long. is that the gist of the this so far?
-
@BeddieKU23 Svi plays in like two weeks. At least that will give us something…
-
@Kcmatt7 I think he’s played in some exhibition games, saw some box scores somewhere.
-
@Crimsonorblue22 He has played in 4 or 5. A couple more to go, then the tournament. Then he plays for KU in Italy. After that, in late August and early September, he plays for the Ukrainian team in a FIBA Euro tournament taking place in Israel and I think another country.
Svi is definitely going to come back with some major experience this fall. Hope it proves helpful!
(This is all discussed in a Gary Bedore article in that newspaper you have, I believe, sworn never to read… thus, I have not included a link.)
-
@HighEliteMajor against oregon, from the tip, our guys did not have the same energy and intensity as oregon. It was painfully obvious. Twice now a zone or matchup zone has contributed to our elite eight loss - you know, the thing bill doesn’t believe in. It would be nice to see him use something to that effect.
-
@JayHawkFanToo Great post!
-
If not for a BS foul called on Graham against Villanova and 2 pick fouls on Jackson against Oregon, we could just as easily be back to back National Champions. Losing sucks and it always will. However, we win more than we lose. These setbacks will make winning our next one all the more sweeter.
-
@brooksmd Perhaps one of our famed & supremely qualified alter ego buckets coaches would politely & galantly probe a probiscous near that scphinter to take one for the team & rescue a few at risk from such peril? Anyone come to mind?
-
@globaljaybird The head, and attached probiscus, which comes to mind most quickly for nomination to undertake such a probe is, I am afraid, previously engaged in a deep self-examination of a similar nature.
-
-
@mayjay @Crimsonorblue22 Are there any box scores to those exhibition games?
-
@Kcmatt7 I didn’t see any, not sure if Gary wrote the article? I know he only scored 4 in one game.
-
You can try and justify it however you want, but it doesn’t change the reality that when KU reaches the Elite 8 (50% of the time under Self), the odds say KU is going have their worst scoring game of the season that night.
I don’t think so. I can count at least 5 games last season when KU scored less points. I have not checked other years but I am sure the result will be similar. Hyperbole will not make your case stronger.
-
@Kcmatt7 No box scores. He has been in 4 games vs France, scoring 13, 4, 22, and 4 (if memory serves correctly). On Sunday he scored 25 with 7 rebs vs Turkey. This weekend starts a 3 game exhib tourney in Italy. His shooting has seemed to be in the 25 to 35% range.
The info on the 1st 4 games is from Bedore’s article about Svi’s reaction to the draft. The rest is from an add-on to an article by Bedore about Jeff Graves starting a women’s minor league bb team in KC.
-
As long as it does not involve politics (they have a deep liberal bias), Snopes is not that bad. But why listen to me…or Snopes, do your own research and reach your own conclusions; at least I provide some links to support my statements, what do you provide other than hot air?
-
JayHawkFanToo said:
You can try and justify it however you want, but it doesn’t change the reality that when KU reaches the Elite 8 (50% of the time under Self), the odds say KU is going have their worst scoring game of the season that night.
I don’t think so. I can count at least 5 games last season when KU scored less points. I have not checked other years but I am sure the result will be similar. Hyperbole will not make your case stronger.
It’s not hyperbole, KU’s lowest single game point total has come in the Elite 8 five times under Bill Self. KU is 1-4 in those games with Davidson in 2008 being the only win. The 5 times KU has put up a season low in points in the Elite 8 are 2007, 2008, 2011, 2016, and 2017. You can dispute it all you want and claim hyperbole all you want. You can claim to @jaybate-1-0 that you use facts all you want, but when you claim you can name 5 games KU scored fewer than the 60 points they did against Oregon, you better be able to back it up which I know you can’t because the schedule doesn’t lie, and doesn’t support your claim in any way, shape, or form.
Here’s the link to KU’s schedules in those 7 years. Prove me wrong, prove it’s hyperbole and not reality that Bill Self and KU have not had their lowest single game point total 5 times in 7 Elite 8 appearances. I’ll post the link to KU’s schedule all 7 of the seasons KU went to the Elite 8 or deeper and you can look for yourself to see if it’s hyperbole or reality.
2016-17 schedule: http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/team/schedule/_/id/2305/kansas-jayhawks
Show me where KU scored less than the 60 they put up against Oregon?
2015-16 schedule: http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/team/schedule/_/id/2305/year/2016
Show me where KU put less than the 59 they put up against Villanova?
2011-12 schedule: http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/team/schedule/_/id/2305/year/2012
This is one of the two Elite 8 appearances KU did not have their lowest scoring game of the year, that happened in the Sweet 16 against NC State.
2010-11 schedule: http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/team/schedule/_/id/2305/year/2011
Show me where KU scored less than the 61 they did against VCU?
2007-08 schedule: http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/team/schedule/_/id/2305/year/2008
KU also only scored 59 against USC so the E8 game against Davidson is tied for the lowest that year, but still the lowest.
Show me where KU scored less than the 59 they put up against Davidson and USC?
2006-07 schedule: http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/team/schedule/_/id/2305/year/2007
Show me where KU scored less than the 55 they put up against UCLA?
2003-04 schedule: http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/team/schedule/_/id/2305/year/2004
The only other year besides 2012 where KU did not have a season low in the Elite 8. KU’s lowest scoring game that year was against Nebraska in Lincoln.
There’s all 7 of KU’s Elite 8 or better seasons under Self. I’ve given you the point total KU scored in each of the 5 Elite 8 games KU had their lowest scoring game of the season and I even told you which game was KU’s lowest in the 2 years it wasn’t the E8.
I’ll even give you KU’s worst scoring game in the other 7 seasons in which KU didn’t reach the Elite 8.
2014-15: Kentucky (Neutral court) - 40 points
2013-14: San Diego St. and Stanford (Round of 32) - 57 points
2012-13: @TCU - 55 points
2009-10: Memphis (Neutral court) - 57 points
2008-09: UMass (Sprint Center) and @Missouri - 60 points
2005-06: Arizona (Neutral court) - 49 points
2004-05: Nebraska - 59 points
-
@Texas-Hawk-10 I really like this post. It is backed up with a lot of facts about KU’s struggles in the Elite 8. Very interesting (and a bit scary).
One of the things that I do find interesting is how well our guys have played in the Final 4 and Finals. To me Bill Self coached teams have looked extremely tight (and occasionally choked) in Elite 8 games but have looked anything but that in the Final 4 and in the actual Final. The thrashing of UNC was the opposite of looking tight. The great comeback win over Ohio St. was all guts. The epic win against Memphis was one of the all time displays of late game confidence in the history of the tournament. Even our “almost” comeback against a far superior Kentucky in 2012 was a display of grit and determination that was not remotely derailed by being nervous.
So, what is it? Is it that the Final 4 is simply the measure of a successful season and that everything after that is gravy? I certainly don’t know the answer but I do know that Bill Self teams (like all great teams) have days that they look tight and choke and they have days where they play college basketball at the highest level and achieve greatness.
-
mayjay said:
@globaljaybird The head, and attached probiscus, which comes to mind most quickly for nomination to undertake such a probe is, I am afraid, previously engaged in a deep self-examination of a similar nature.
A real shame, sure they could most accurately & professionally sniff this one out, pompous or not.
-
So: you DO believe Snopes!
Howling!
No, wait! What am I thinking. I’m all hot air. You said it so it has to be true. Holy cow, I’m not worthy. I feel so insecure and submissive. I can’t even stop dry washing. I am wracked with self doubt. My anti-perspirant is failing me. I am full of hot air. You said so, so it has to be true. I can barely look at myself in the mirror. Hot air. All is lost. Woe, woe, woe.
Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation
- Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don’t discuss it – especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it’s not reported, it didn’t happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.
- Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used to show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the ‘How dare you!’ gambit.
- Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such ‘arguable rumors’. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a ‘wild rumor’ from a ‘bunch of kids on the Internet’ which can have no basis in fact.
- Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent’s argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
- Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary ‘attack the messenger’ ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as ‘kooks’, ‘right-wing’, ‘liberal’, ‘left-wing’, ‘terrorists’, ‘conspiracy buffs’, ‘radicals’, ‘militia’, ‘racists’, ‘religious fanatics’, ‘sexual deviates’, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
- Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain critical reasoning – simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent’s viewpoint.
- Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could be taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.
- Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough ‘jargon’ and ‘minutia’ to illustrate you are ‘one who knows’, and simply say it isn’t so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.
- Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
- Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man – usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with - a kind of investment for the future should the matter not be so easily contained.) Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually then be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues – so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.
- Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the ‘high road’ and ‘confess’ with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made – but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, ‘just aren’t so.’ Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later, and even publicly ‘call for an end to the nonsense’ because you have already ‘done the right thing.’ Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for ‘coming clean’ and ‘owning up’ to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.
- Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to lose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.
- Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards or with an apparent deductive logic which forbears any actual material fact.
- Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best with issues qualifying for rule 10.
- Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.
- Vanish evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won’t have to address the issue.
- Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can ‘argue’ with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.
- Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how ‘sensitive they are to criticism.’
- Ignore facts presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the ‘play dumb’ rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon.) In order to completely avoid discussing issues, it may be required that you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.
- False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations – as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.
- Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed an unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed. Usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim.
- Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.
- Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.
- Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by destroying them financially, emotionally, or severely damaging their health.
- Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen. Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist
- Avoidance They never actually discuss issues head-on or provide constructive input, generally avoiding citation of references or credentials. Rather, they merely imply this, that, and the other. Virtually everything about their presentation implies their authority and expert knowledge in the matter without any further justification for credibility.
- Selectivity They tend to pick and choose opponents carefully, either applying the hit-and-run approach against mere commentators supportive of opponents, or focusing heavier attacks on key opponents who are known to directly address issues. Should a commentator become argumentative with any success, the focus will shift to include the commentator as well.
- Coincidental They tend to surface suddenly and somewhat coincidentally with a new controversial topic with no clear prior record of participation in general discussions in the particular public arena involved. They likewise tend to vanish once the topic is no longer of general concern. They were likely directed or elected to be there for a reason, and vanish with the reason.
- Teamwork They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs or teams. Of course, this can happen naturally in any public forum, but there will likely be an ongoing pattern of frequent exchanges of this sort where professionals are involved. Sometimes one of the players will infiltrate the opponent camp to become a source for straw man or other tactics designed to dilute opponent presentation strength.
- Anti-conspiratorial They almost always have disdain for ‘conspiracy theorists’ and, usually, for those who in any way believe JFK was not killed by LHO. Ask yourself why, if they hold such disdain for conspiracy theorists, do they focus on defending a single topic discussed in a News Group (NG) focusing on conspiracies? One might think they would either be trying to make fools of everyone on every topic, or simply ignore the group they hold in such disdain. Or, one might more rightly conclude they have an ulterior motive for their actions in going out of their way to focus as they do.
- Artificial Emotions An odd kind of ‘artificial’ emotionalism and an unusually thick skin – an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance. This likely stems from intelligence community training that, no matter how condemning the evidence, deny everything, and never become emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for a disinfo artist is that emotions can seem artificial. Most people, if responding in anger, for instance, will express their animosity throughout their rebuttal. But disinfo types usually have trouble maintaining the ‘image’ and are hot and cold with respect to pretended emotions and their usually more calm or unemotional communications style. It’s just a job, and they often seem unable to ‘act their role in character’ as well in a communications medium as they might be able in a real face-to-face conversation/confrontation. You might have outright rage and indignation one moment, ho-hum the next, and more anger later – an emotional yo-yo. With respect to being thick-skinned, no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their job, and they will generally continue their old disinfo patterns without any adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they play that game – where a more rational individual who truly cares what others think might seek to improve their communications style, substance, and so forth, or simply give up.
- Inconsistent There is also a tendency to make mistakes which betray their true self/motives. This may stem from not really knowing their topic, or it may be somewhat ‘freudian’, so to speak, in that perhaps they really root for the side of truth deep within. I have noted that often, they will simply cite contradictory information which neutralizes itself and the author. For instance, one such player claimed to be a Navy pilot, but blamed his poor communicating skills (spelling, grammar, incoherent style) on having only a grade-school education. I’m not aware of too many Navy pilots who don’t have a college degree. Another claimed no knowledge of a particular topic/situation but later claimed first-hand knowledge of it.
- Time Constant There are three ways this can be seen to work, especially when the government or other empowered player is involved in a cover up operation: ANY NG posting by a targeted proponent for truth can result in an IMMEDIATE response. The government and other empowered players can afford to pay people to sit there and watch for an opportunity to do some damage. SINCE DISINFO IN A NG ONLY WORKS IF THE READER SEES IT - FAST RESPONSE IS CALLED FOR, or the visitor may be swayed towards truth. –anon.
25 ways, yeah baby!
-
You are right and I stand corrected. I misread the score of the KU- Oregon game.
I have no problem admitting when I am wrong or post incorrect information. Not the first time and probably not the last either.
-
mayjay said:
@globaljaybird The head, and attached probiscus, which comes to mind most quickly for nomination to undertake such a probe is, I am afraid, previously engaged in a deep self-examination of a similar nature.
I see what you did there…
-
@mayjay Now this is a chippy thread right here.
-
BeddieKU23 said:
the off-season is too long. is that the gist of the this so far?
Didn’t start like that. KUSTEVE started a pretty decent topic but it morphed that way. Some seem to be very challenged in the productivity category. But I must admit, trolls can be amusing when a clever adversary gives them a thorough scalding. @jaybate-1-0 has always been quite accomplished at that.
-
@globaljaybird
He had a really good starting thread/discussion point. I fully agree that Self hit a home run with the cycle of players we have leaving the program between this past year and this upcoming season. Landing 3 of the most sought after transfers that were not only high school Top 100 kids but studs at the College level already adds even more to it. We don’t have to use the brain too hard to understand these guys are starters waiting in the wings. Whether they help us win championships which a lot of this conversation went towards is another story/unwritten conclusion at this point. I know one thing, they certainly give us a foundation for 2018/19 that Self can work with.
And its clear after 2 + months of no KU games that we are already starving for games. The off-season discussions always veer off the wagon and have no balance because there are no games to fill in the gaps.
