Bracketology thread for the next few weeks.
-
@BeddieKU23 if they get through A&M.
That team could show up and compete when they feel like it.
-
I think the West looks easiest at the top. I like our bracket early, but we will have to get past a one seed type in either MSU or Duke if we get to the elite 8.
-
In Omaha with MSU and Duke? We’re winning that game. But we gotta get there first. It can happen. This team CAN win this tournament
-
West Virginia and WSU potential
-
Hawk8086 said:
I think the West looks easiest at the top. I like our bracket early, but we will have to get past a one seed type in either MSU or Duke if we get to the elite 8.
If we are good enough at that point we want to prove so… bring it and let the rest take care of it’s self.
-
I’m a little worried about a Duke or MSU match in the EE, those two teams may have the most talent in the field. But we’d have to get there first.
-
Houston is the team I’d be most scared of in the West outside of UNC/Xavier
-
@Crimsonorblue22 maybe in the NC game
-
kjayhawks said:
I’m a little worried about a Duke or MSU match in the EE, those two teams may have the most talent in the field. But we’d have to get there first.
I think we say this every year and it’s overblown we crushed the same michigan st team last yr
-
Crimsonorblue22 said:
West Virginia and WSU potential
Very ANGRY game.
-
Hawk8086 said:
I think the West looks easiest at the top. I like our bracket early, but we will have to get past a one seed type in either MSU or Duke if we get to the elite 8.
Elite 8 is supposed to be a top 10 caliber match up. Not supposed to be an easy one.
-
@BeddieKU23 Michigan State is much much better this year obviously they have a 3 seed not a 9. That and we are no where near as athletic as a year ago. It really it’s gonna depend on how we shoot, one game at a time.
-
BeddieKU23 said:
kjayhawks said:
I’m a little worried about a Duke or MSU match in the EE, those two teams may have the most talent in the field. But we’d have to get there first.
I think we say this every year and it’s overblown we crushed the same michigan st team last yr
That was a 15 loss MSU team. Cassius Winston is greatly improved.
-
kjayhawks said:
@BeddieKU23 Michigan State is much much better this year obviously they have a 3 seed not a 9. It really it’s gonna depend on how we shoot, one game at a time.
Sure they are better and they added a NBA player to the roster. Still they have an inflated record. They can be beaten
-
@BeddieKU23 anyone can be beaten lol
-
BShark said:
BeddieKU23 said:
kjayhawks said:
I’m a little worried about a Duke or MSU match in the EE, those two teams may have the most talent in the field. But we’d have to get there first.
I think we say this every year and it’s overblown we crushed the same michigan st team last yr
That was a 15 loss MSU team. Cassius Winston is greatly improved.
He is and Langford as well. Bridges and ward are mostly the same. Mcquaid bothers me the most
-
-
Tech and west Virginia could meet in the sweet 16
-
I thought we got a good draw. i would’ve preferred a purdue as a 2 seed, and tenn as a 3. Still, I have always thought Dook was overrated, and Sparty is beatable.
-
can we start a new thread for bracket this one is taking forever to load
-
1st round games I’m looking forward to:
Florida vs. UCLA/St. Bonnie’s
Alabama/VTech
Ohio St./South Dakota St.
Texas/Nevada
Creighton/KSU (Marcus Foster should be motivated for that one)
Texas A&M/Providence
Missouri/Florida St.
I’m sure they’ll be other great games, but those 7 are the ones I’m most looking forward to now.
-
@KUSTEVE LOL
-
@BShark i was kidding, but i didn’t want you to get mad.
-
@KUSTEVE It’s all good. I hate WSU ftr.
-
Extra fun beating fellow blue bloods, though!
-
TIMEOUT!!! Lets get by Penn and make it to the Sweet 16 before we start worrying about Duke or Sparty. S Hall, NC State, Clemson, Auburn, all good teams in our half. Just one flat shooting game and we are out, just like the last two years. Lets go one game at a time and move on, and soon we will be in San Antonio
-
Great quote from Seth Greenberg on the top half of our region:
“You guys take the field…I’ll take Kansas>”
'bout damn time !
-
BeddieKU23 said:
kjayhawks said:
I’m a little worried about a Duke or MSU match in the EE, those two teams may have the most talent in the field. But we’d have to get there first.
I think we say this every year and it’s overblown we crushed the same michigan st team last yr
This is not the same MSU as last year. Jackson is a beast…the other guys are better.
-
Talking heads say Nova has the easiest bracket to the final four. Ours is the toughest. Imagine that.
-
-
batenac 1.0, the all seeing one from the east only predicts KU games, and is at this very moment withdrawing the KU bracket from a mayonaisse jar and will get back with you if/when he can foresee clearly the future.
To reiterate, after the thermonuclear hot shooting of games 2 and 3 in the useless conference tourney, I have great trepidation about game 2 of the first weekend, despite strong reassurances of other swamis that the first weekend is a lock for KU. One can now be assured that at least one game in the coming potential three 2-game tournaments will see KU having more difficulty getting the trey ball to fall through the orange rim than an elephant dancing on one leg through the sphincter of a Tse Tse fly.
But, I must make clear, that as of this moment, batenac 1.0 has no clear vision beyond the trepidation of Game 2 of Weekend 1.
And most certainly no theorizin’.
-
We’re in the champions classic bracket. Funny season. MSU 29-4 3 seed, we go 27-7 and get a 1 seed in the same region. I don’t like seeing Duke in our path. But we’ve had recent success against Duke too. Everyone here is saying it’s a good draw, my first take was it was tough, but I do like the path to the Elite 8.
And it’s really strange to not see Wisconsin’s name. One of the unlikeliest long tournament runs comes to an end. When their streak started in 1999 they had been dancing all of 4 seasons, winning it all once believe it or not. 3 final fours since, 1 title game, 10 sweet 16’s including the last five years. And all with very few bonafide stars.
Wisconsin and KU could have met in 2008 but upstart Davidson got hot behind some kid, I forget his name
and they nearly prevented us from winning it all that season.
-
Meanwhile 22-10 and 13-5 in the league Nebraska stays home and 19-15 Alabama gets in. 8-10 in the weak SEC. I really can’t stand the preferential treatment given to the SEC. Bama losers of 6 of last 8 by the way and early season losers to Minnesota who was one of the two worst teams in the big 10.
-
@wissox Nebraska only had 3 “quality wins” this year. While I think they got robbed from just the “eye test”, they went 3-9 in quadrant 1 and 2 games. Their noncon schedule was really weak as well, and they lost all of the ones that would have been good wins. Tough break, but it finally looks like Tim Miles might have some momentum in Lincoln. Return their 4 best players and a few young guys should get much better this offseason which will allow them to be a better and deeper next year. I think they will be a big surprise this time next year.
Bama played a tougher noncon schedule and had a lot more quality wins.
The Big 10 perception really hurt them this season. And the conference members did themselves no favors. Nobody played a tough noncon. And the teams that did either got demolished or made the tourney as a top 5 seed. Over half of the teams had noncon strength of schedules ranked in the 100s I believe. And they lost some really bad games.
-
@Kcmatt7 So just play tough teams and lose to them and you’ll get in? Or play and beat easier teams and not get in? Nebraska beat the teams they were supposed to except Illinois. Bama’s record sucks. They’ve lost 6 of their last 8! They lost 15 games but the NCAA makes room for the populous south. It’s pretty sick. I’m not even going to talk about all the other SEC teams playing this week. Penn St. had a good case. 1 bad loss to Rider, and a bunch of tough losses to good teams and some good wins in the conference. Once the NCAA gets it in their minds that a league is good or bad it sets the tone. Wins get excused for the Big10 because it’s bad and losses get excused for the SEC because it’s good. Heck, OkSt should be in if Bama is in. OKState had quite a few good wins as we know.
-
By the way, CBS ranked all 68 teams and we were ranked 8th, MSU was 3, Duke was 2.
-
@wissox @Kcmatt7 Nebraska got robbed IMO, when’s the last time a power 5 team had 13 conference wins and didn’t get in? While teams like Syracuse, Oklahoma, Texas and Arizona State all had finished 2 games below .500, Arizona State while playing in the weakest power 5 conference. I don’t like the idea of rewarding teams for wins in November and December because most teams get better as the year goes on, these teams got worse. Does anyone think we would lose to Washington or Arizona State if we played ether right now, I sure as heck don’t.
-
wissox said:
By the way, CBS ranked all 68 teams and we were ranked 8th, MSU was 3, Duke was 2.
MSU as a 3 seed is a joke. Committee hated the B1G this year though.
-
@BShark like I said earlier IMO, MSU and Dook are the most talented teams in the bracket. Doesn’t necessarily mean they are the best but it’s does looked like we got jobbed from the stand point that MSU, Dook are ranked in the top 5 in the latest AP and Coaches Poll. I personally feel like we get the toughest bracket about 80% of the time but there isn’t a easy road bye any stretch and if you’re the best you got beat the best.
-
@kjayhawks I don’t understand how MSU isn’t a 2 seed but w/e.
-
UK vs Arizona is the MOST INSANE 2nd round game since???
-
@wissox Nebraska didn’t beat ANYONE but Michigan the entire year.
Nebraska did not earn a bid. They played the 291st ranked noncon schedule. Combined with the conference schedule, The 4 quality noncon games they played, they lost. The have only 1 win against teams that made the tournament.
Nebraska did not belong in the tournament and would have been crushed in the SEC this season. They earned nothing. They even got lucky enough that they didn’t have to see 3 of the top 4 teams twice. Instead they played Illinois, Rutgers, Wisconsin, Minnesota and Penn St. twice. So that conference record you are boasting about was very inflated.
Alabama is the better team with the better resume. They played the 29th noncon schedule, winning 3 of 5 quality games. They only played 2 quadrant 4 games all season long. They have 7 wins against tournament teams on the year.
The entire B10 learned a lesson this season. Playing dog crap schedules in the noncon and then coasting on a conference record just because you are in a P5 conference won’t fool the selection committee. MSU and Purdue are probably kicking themselves that they didn’t schedule 3 or 4 more good noncon games. Could have put them as a 1 seed easily.
-
@BShark since UK and Indiana after Indiana won the B10 outright and still got a 5 seed lol.
-
USC was the truly absurd snub. Best team I can remember to not get in.
-
Every year there are teams that most of us think should be in and get snubbed and teams that do get in that most of us think should no be in.
I posted before that I would not be surprised to see Michigan State as a 3 or even a 4 seed. The NCAA has a set of rules it uses to seed teams and its record against quadrant 1 and 2 was not good, partly because the Big 10 was weak and marginally better than the PAC 12 that only got 3 teams in and two of them are in the play-in games in Dayton.
-
I’d rather be KU than Duke. Duke’s gotta get through MSU (you can reverse the two if you’d like) just to play KU. KU’s path is pretty wide open to that point.
-
I wonder: would tournament promotion and brand management be helped, or hindered, if UK beat UA early and made the UA/Stumpy “issue” disappear ASAP from “the narrative”?
There. I used “narrative” to try to be hip and hypermodern.
-
Things to consider in the first round.
Missouri’s 2nd leading scorer was suspended for their opening round game. I don’t see how they win.
Miami’s Bruce Brown will miss the rest of the season and they are definitely on upset alert against Loyola Chicago
-
Hawk8086 said:
BeddieKU23 said:
kjayhawks said:
I’m a little worried about a Duke or MSU match in the EE, those two teams may have the most talent in the field. But we’d have to get there first.
I think we say this every year and it’s overblown we crushed the same michigan st team last yr
This is not the same MSU as last year. Jackson is a beast…the other guys are better.
Have you watched Michigan St play?
If the answer is yes then explain what makes them that much different. You mentioned Jackson, yes he’s good, potentially Top 5 in the draft good. Can step out and make the 3 and has elite level rim protection ability. The other players who we spanked as freshman are sophomores. They have a few veterans with experience, Nairn, McQuaid, Goins who come off the bench. They rely heavily on 5 guys like we do. Winston has become a really good PG and has shot lights out from 3 all season long. I have watched them plenty. Its a lot of paper talent that hasn’t played up to its potential all season long IMO. We talk a lot about being battle tested, Michigan St is the opposite of battle tested. When they play teams as good as them they struggle. I would welcome playing them in the Elite 8.
-
wissox said:
Meanwhile 22-10 and 13-5 in the league Nebraska stays home and 19-15 Alabama gets in. 8-10 in the weak SEC. I really can’t stand the preferential treatment given to the SEC. Bama losers of 6 of last 8 by the way and early season losers to Minnesota who was one of the two worst teams in the big 10.
Collin Sexton hype all week from ESPN put them in. Then they get blown out by Kentucky and still get in…
