Would like Zeke back as well.

Posts made by approxinfinity
-
Happy Easter!
To you and yours. Hope you find chocolate, thoughts of Jesus, and/or other positive things more relevant to you today.
-
RE: TV shows
Finished season 1 of The Last Of Us. As far as zombie apocalypse shows go i found it to be believable and well scripted.
-
RE: TV shows
Season 3 of White Lotus started slow but rounded into form beautifully. Wasnt sure it would.
-
RE: Recruiting Notes
This is very good use of the 2022 trophy. https://x.com/HSTopRecruiting/status/1913656451798597915
-
RE: The portal.
@wissox not like those guys who originally committed to Towson and Appalachian State.
-
RE: The portal.
@drgnslayr you keep making these posts that i think should be their own threads!
I am optimistic. I probably need to temper my optimism more than I am.
I’m sure our team won’t always look like a high ceiling, high floor roster full of alphadawgs once the season starts, like they appear to be when they’re bright, shiny signees.
There will be stumbles, there will be underperformers.
But none of the signees thus far have seemed like bad fits, or guys I don’t want to root for (Hunter, when his transfer to us was announced). None of them seem soft, or contact averse. All of them seem to have demonstrated leadership qualities on their teams. All of them appear to be interested in playing some defense. Bill has seemed involved in the recruitment.
We retained Flory.
I’m happy and excited about basketball again, but I would be happier still to see some staff shakeup and when we see the roster rounded out.
If we get 4 more guys cut from the same cloth as those we have already acquired, it could be something special.
Looking forward to no crutches, no excuses, and no bullshit. Bring your hard hats and man up boys.
-
RE: The portal.
@Texas-Hawk-10 we’ll see what beard can get out of him. Should be interesting.
-
RE: Recruiting Notes
If Bill has three number one guys at their respective positions… hoooo leeee man
-
Dog days of Sprummer.
I just paused Youtube tv and cancelled some other streaming services. Espn made the cut barely. Youtube will unpause end of august in time for football.
Tell me Bucketeers, have I made a grievous error in my calculations? Is there any must see sports or other type tv coming our way between now and the Fall that should be on our radar?
-
RE: The portal.
@BShark lol thats fantastic about Flagg. I may just root for the kid in the pros.
Im sure New Balance stroked a pretty healthy check.
-
RE: The portal.
@BShark my assumption is that shoe co money is very much driving the bus, when it comes to sweetening deals, a bit above the table and a lot below.
I guess my question would be “whats stopping it from working like that?”
-
RE: How will our coaches adapt to rosters full of 1 to 2 year guys?
@drgnslayr just realized between me starting this thread from one of your posts and @dylans resuscitating an ancient thread of yours to mask his Frank prank behind your avatar, we might owe you some NIL money!
-
Playing baseball on turf
Diamond dirt and grass are such a big part of the baseball experience for me. I was oblivious that people are playing on turf. Blew my mind a little bit. Especially the dirt parts actually being turf.
-
RE: The portal.
Wow, yes please
This team could very much be the “not 2024-2025 Jayhawks”
Also, the url for that youtube video ends in KU. I will take that as a sign.
-
RE: Percentages of points from 2, 3 and FT by year
Chatgpt has dishonored this household… ive spent an hour or so slaving over a google sheet my own damn self… will let you know when the kinks are worked out.
-
RE: The portal.
Someone rightly pointed out that the list we are discussing is valuation and not program revenue. However, the revenue numbers from this nasdaq article in 2023 were more alarming: https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/schools-that-make-the-most-money-off-college-basketball
-
RE: The portal.
Indiana is the highest value Adidas program and was Flory’s likely destination before Kansas decided to pay him the NIL he was worth. Peterson basically said he was coming back to KU no matter that we looked like a complete dumpster fire at the time.
Pretty clear that shoeco money rules the CBB universe and university NIL is just the part of the iceberg visible above sea level.
-
RE: The portal.
Two adidas schools more valuable than Kansas on that list, if chatgpt is to be trusted:
Rank Program Revenue Shoe Sponsor Notes 1 North Carolina $378M Jordan Brand (Nike) Longstanding partnership since the early 1990s. 2 Duke $370M Nike Historically a Nike school; recent reports suggest potential shift to Jordan Brand. 3 Indiana $279M Adidas Extended their apparel deal with Adidas for 10 years. 4 Ohio State $262M Nike Official athletics website features Nike products. 5 Louisville $260M Adidas Entered a $160 million deal with Adidas. 6 Arizona $257M Nike Renewed athletic apparel contract with Nike. 7 Syracuse $256M Nike Extended relationship with Nike, spanning over 30 years. 8 Illinois $232M Nike Celebrated 25-year partnership with Nike. 9 Kentucky $223M Nike (Mamba Program) Selected as the first “Mamba Program” school in partnership with Nike. 10 Arkansas $217M Nike Nike became exclusive provider for Razorbacks Athletics. 11 Kansas $191M Adidas Extended deal with Adidas through 2031. 12 Michigan $189M Jordan Brand (Nike) Finalized agreement with Nike; features Jordan Brand products. 13 Michigan State $183M Nike Partnered with Nike for custom products. 14 UConn $165M Nike Extended exclusive sponsorship agreement with Nike. 15 Minnesota $164M Nike Official men’s basketball page features Nike products. -
RE: Congrats, Frank!
I miss Frank. Was hoping this was news that he was now on staff.
But i will settle on a video of proof of what kind of a freak athlete he was.
-
RE: The portal.
Someone mentioned Pop Isaacs to Houston? Yay. 27 point night coming our way.
-
RE: KU Roster for 25-26
Yeah that video doesnt inspire a whole lot of confidence. He is heaving it from low down. Unless he is Steph Curry, I dont really want to rely on someone who has to shoot from his knees against B12 defenders
-
RE: Percentages of points from 2, 3 and FT by year
Its very possible that the above is all correct and what i am doing now is not since everything above is consistent and the new thing which requires more heavy lifting is not
-
RE: Percentages of points from 2, 3 and FT by year
Yeah i don’t have time to do this right now but what i am trying to do now is use it to break down the ratio in wins vs losses. I think this is a good thread to pull.
Its gets us down the road.
-
RE: Percentages of points from 2, 3 and FT by year
My stats may be bogus. I’m using chatgpt to parse some data for me. Now i’m getting different results. Please hold.
-
RE: Percentages of points from 2, 3 and FT by year
I think that 16% FT is def worth striving for.
-
RE: Percentages of points from 2, 3 and FT by year
Houston under Sampson:
Season Record NCAA Tournament Result FT% 3PT% 2PT% 2024–25 35–5 Runner-Up ~16% ~32% ~52% 2023–24 32–5 Sweet Sixteen ~15% ~31% ~54% 2022–23 33–4 Sweet Sixteen ~14% ~30% ~56% 2021–22 32–6 Elite Eight ~15% ~31% ~54% 2020–21 28–4 Final Four ~14% ~30% ~56% 2019–20 23–8 Tournament Canceled ~13% ~29% ~58% 2018–19 33–4 Sweet Sixteen ~14% ~30% ~56% 2017–18 27–8 Round of 32 ~13% ~28% ~59% 2016–17 21–11 No Tournament ~12% ~27% ~61% 2015–16 22–10 NIT First Round ~13% ~28% ~59% 2014–15 13–19 No Tournament ~12% ~27% ~61% -
RE: Percentages of points from 2, 3 and FT by year
Check out Duke’s breakdown for this year for something eye popping
Season Coach Record NCAA Tournament Result FT% 3PT% 2PT% 2024–25 Jon Scheyer 35–4 Final Four 18.3% 36.4% 45.3% 2023–24 Jon Scheyer 27–9 Sweet Sixteen ~16% ~34% ~50% 2022–23 Jon Scheyer 27–9 Second Round ~15% ~32% ~53% 2021–22 Mike Krzyzewski 32–7 Final Four ~16% ~33% ~51% 2020–21 Mike Krzyzewski 13–11 No Tournament ~14% ~32% ~54% 2019–20 Mike Krzyzewski 25–6 Tournament Canceled ~15% ~33% ~52% 2018–19 Mike Krzyzewski 32–6 Elite Eight ~16% ~31% ~53% 2017–18 Mike Krzyzewski 29–8 Elite Eight ~15% ~32% ~53% 2016–17 Mike Krzyzewski 28–9 Second Round ~14% ~33% ~53% 2015–16 Mike Krzyzewski 25–11 Sweet Sixteen ~15% ~32% ~53% 2014–15 Mike Krzyzewski 35–4 National Champions ~16% ~31% ~53% 2013–14 Mike Krzyzewski 26–9 First Round ~15% ~32% ~53% 2012–13 Mike Krzyzewski 30–6 Elite Eight ~14% ~33% ~53% 2011–12 Mike Krzyzewski 27–7 First Round ~15% ~32% ~53% 2010–11 Mike Krzyzewski 32–5 Sweet Sixteen ~16% ~31% ~53% 2009–10 Mike Krzyzewski 35–5 National Champions ~15% ~32% ~53% 2008–09 Mike Krzyzewski 30–7 Sweet Sixteen ~14% ~33% ~53% 2007–08 Mike Krzyzewski 28–6 Second Round ~15% ~32% ~53% 2006–07 Mike Krzyzewski 22–11 First Round ~16% ~31% ~53% 2005–06 Mike Krzyzewski 32–4 Sweet Sixteen ~15% ~32% ~53% 2004–05 Mike Krzyzewski 27–6 Sweet Sixteen ~14% ~33% ~53% 2003–04 Mike Krzyzewski 31–6 Final Four ~15% ~32% ~53% 2002–03 Mike Krzyzewski 26–7 Sweet Sixteen ~16% ~31% ~53% 2001–02 Mike Krzyzewski 31–4 Sweet Sixteen ~15% ~32% ~53% 2000–01 Mike Krzyzewski 35–4 National Champions ~14% ~33% ~53% 1999–00 Mike Krzyzewski 29–5 Sweet Sixteen ~15% ~32% ~53% 1998–99 Mike Krzyzewski 37–2 Runner-Up ~16% ~31% ~53% 1997–98 Mike Krzyzewski 32–4 Elite Eight ~15% ~32% ~53% 1996–97 Mike Krzyzewski 24–9 Second Round ~14% ~33% ~53% 1995–96 Mike Krzyzewski 18–13 First Round ~15% ~32% ~53% 1994–95 Mike Krzyzewski 9–3* No Tournament ~16% ~31% ~53% 1993–94 Mike Krzyzewski 28–6 Runner-Up ~15% ~32% ~53% 1992–93 Mike Krzyzewski 24–8 Second Round ~14% ~33% ~53% 1991–92 Mike Krzyzewski 34–2 National Champions ~15% ~32% ~53% 1990–91 Mike Krzyzewski 32–7 National Champions ~16% ~31% ~53% 1989–90 Mike Krzyzewski 29–9 Runner-Up ~15% ~32% ~53% 1988–89 Mike Krzyzewski 28–8 Final Four ~14% ~33% ~53% 1987–88 Mike Krzy -
RE: Percentages of points from 2, 3 and FT by year
Heres Villanova under Jay Wright:
Season Record NCAA Tournament Result FT% 3PT% 2PT% 2021–22 30–8 Final Four ~16% ~32% ~52% 2020–21 18–7 Sweet Sixteen ~15% ~31% ~54% 2019–20 24–7 Tournament Canceled ~14% ~30% ~56% 2018–19 26–10 Second Round ~15% ~32% ~53% 2017–18 36–4 National Champions ~16% ~35% ~49% 2016–17 32–4 Second Round ~15% ~34% ~51% 2015–16 35–5 National Champions ~16% ~33% ~51% 2014–15 33–3 Second Round ~15% ~32% ~53% 2013–14 29–5 Second Round ~14% ~31% ~55% 2012–13 20–14 Round of 64 ~13% ~30% ~57% 2011–12 13–19 No Tournament ~12% ~29% ~59% 2010–11 21–12 Round of 64 ~13% ~30% ~57% 2009–10 25–8 Round of 32 ~14% ~31% ~55% 2008–09 30–8 Final Four ~15% ~32% ~53% 2007–08 22–13 Sweet Sixteen ~14% ~31% ~55% 2006–07 22–11 Round of 64 ~13% ~30% ~57% 2005–06 28–5 Elite Eight ~14% ~31% ~55% 2004–05 24–8 Sweet Sixteen ~13% ~30% ~57% 2003–04 18–17 NIT Quarterfinal ~12% ~29% ~59% 2002–03 15–16 NIT First Round ~11% ~28% ~61% 2001–02 19–13 NIT Quarterfinal ~12% ~29% ~59% -
RE: Percentages of points from 2, 3 and FT by year
Heres Uconn under Hurley:
Season Record NCAA Tournament Result FT% 3PT% 2PT% 2024–25 24–11 Second Round ~14% ~30% ~56% 2023–24 37–3 National Champions ~15% ~32% ~53% 2022–23 31–8 National Champions ~15% ~31% ~54% 2021–22 23–10 First Round ~14% ~30% ~56% 2020–21 15–8 First Round ~13% ~29% ~58% 2019–20 19–12 No Tournament (COVID) ~14% ~30% ~56% 2018–19 16–17 No Tournament ~13% ~28% ~59% -
RE: Percentages of points from 2, 3 and FT by year
Historically high percentage of points from 2, low from 3, low from FT.
-
Percentages of points from 2, 3 and FT by year
Season Record NCAA Tournament Result FT% 3PT% 2PT% 2024–25 21–13 First Round 13.6% 28.5% 57.9% 2023–24 23–11 Second Round ~14% ~30% ~56% 2022–23 28–8 Round of 32 ~15% ~32% ~53% 2021–22 34–6 National Champions ~16% ~31% ~53% 2020–21 21–9 Second Round ~15% ~29% ~56% 2019–20 28–3 Tournament Canceled ~14% ~30% ~56% 2018–19 26–10 Second Round ~15% ~31% ~54% 2017–18 31–8 Final Four ~16% ~32% ~52% 2016–17 31–5 Elite Eight ~15% ~33% ~52% 2015–16 33–5 Elite Eight ~14% ~34% ~52% 2014–15 27–9 Round of 32 ~15% ~33% ~52% 2013–14 25–10 Round of 32 ~16% ~32% ~52% 2012–13 31–6 Sweet Sixteen ~15% ~31% ~54% 2011–12 32–7 National Runner-Up ~14% ~30% ~56% 2010–11 35–3 Elite Eight ~15% ~32% ~53% 2009–10 33–3 Second Round ~14% ~33% ~53% 2008–09 27–8 Sweet Sixteen ~15% ~32% ~53% 2007–08 37–3 National Champions ~16% ~31% ~53% 2006–07 33–5 Elite Eight ~15% ~32% ~53% 2005–06 25–8 First Round ~14% ~33% ~53% 2004–05 23–7 First Round ~15% ~32% ~53% 2003–04 24–9 Elite Eight ~16% ~31% ~53% 2002–03 30–8 National Runner-Up ~15% ~32% ~53% -
RE: How will our coaches adapt to rosters full of 1 to 2 year guys?
Does anyone know the timetable we might expect the announcement of staff changes?
-
RE: The portal.
@Jhawk69 sounds like a good group offensively. How do they stack up defensively?
-
RE: Fiftieth Annual KU Buckets Bracket Challenge!!!
Congrats to yobear, my brother (me myself and KJ) and KU Beddie, for finishing top 3 with Florida over Houston!
-
RE: How will our coaches adapt to rosters full of 1 to 2 year guys?
@drgnslayr i took the liberty of forking this post into its own topic. It does seem to be the crux of lingering discontent about the future, at least for me.