Is Bill Self a Corrupt Coach?
-
…and that is why hearsay is not admissible in any court because it is unproven, highly prejudicial and most likely untrue. If there was any evidence and I mean ANY evidence, someone in the MSM would have been all over it.
Think about it. The comments in this thread appear on Google, someone will google it, see your comment and post as fact that Coach Self is corrupt based on your comment as a KU fan in a KU basketball forum. Threads like this is what fuels all the hearsay and innuendo that we see.
-
JayHawkFanToo said:
…and that is why hearsay is not admissible in any court because it is unproven, highly prejudicial and most likely untrue. If there was any evidence and I mean ANY evidence, someone in the MSM would have been all over it.
Think about it. The comments in this thread appear on Google, someone will google it, see your comment and post as fact that Coach Self is corrupt based on your comment as a KU fan in a KU basketball forum. Threads like this is what fuels all the hearsay and innuendo that we see.
Everything the other way is speculation too was my only point. Only Self and very few people ultimately know.
-
I do apologize has I wasn’t referring to you. However I think you might have proven my point? If it is perfectly legal for shoe companies to pay HS Kids then why is the FBI involved? You say mere pennies, yet I say how deep does the rabbit hole go. There is some serious money being thrown around.
Are you suggesting that the FBI is only getting involved because Adidas is an Foreign entity? I would say that is Naïve but I won’t disrespect you like that. You be right? The FBI’s handling recent current events makes me think there is something in the Bureau.
However I still stick to the money/tax theory. It’s not just the lack of taxes but where this money is coming from, to whom this money is going too, and how this money is being spent. Remember it was Tax evasion that finally brought down the Al Capone at the hands of the FBI.
-
A couple off point that I want to bring to your attention. First, we have to differentiate between what breaks the law and what breaks a NCAA rule and doing something that breaks an NCAA rule does not necessarily breaks the law. For example, buying a meal for a student athlete might violate NCAA rules but by no means breaks any laws. Adidas or Nike can go to a high school and say we are going to select a few students and will give them each $10K to wear Adidas or Nike gear and there is no law being broken; of course those students would not be eligible to play college sports but no laws are broken. I guess we can agree on this.
Now comes the FBI and says these student are hiding these payments to play college when they would otherwise be ineligible and hence they are conspiring to defraud schools and we will prosecute to enforce basically NCAA rules even when the alleged victims do not consider themselves victims at all. Now, if Adidas is using illegally obtained money and using college kids to basically launder the money I can see where they could get involved. However, in this case Adidas is using money legally gained as a result of the company’s operations. Seems to me like a like a stretch to use the FBI to investigate this case.
I brought the Al Capone name myself but only to indicate that large scale tax evasion can be used to convict someone but we are talking apples and oranges. Lots of people were being killed as a result of Al Capone’s operation and the government was unable to tie any of them to Capone and as a last ditch they used the tax evasion charge based on the illegal acquisition of said money and the corresponding tax evasion by one individual and the illegal money and tax evaded were orders of magnitude greater than what we are talking on the current indictment and the money was not illegally obtained by Adidas, the tax evasion, if any, is done in a tiny scale by lots of unrelated individuals rather than the corporation and people are not being killed on a daily basis…at least not in relation to the alleged payments.
In my opinion, and I don’t believe I am alone, this was a case brought up by an overzealous, publicity seeking prosecutor and the case will likely end with a whimper rather than a bag. It also appears there is an agenda behind the indictment. Based on the recent actions by the FBI, nothing would surprise me any more.
Looks like we will have to wait some more to know all the details.
-
You said: Now comes the FBI and says these student are hiding these payments to play college when they would otherwise be ineligible and hence they are conspiring to defraud schools and we will prosecute to enforce basically NCAA rules even when the alleged victims do not consider themselves victims at all
What are they hiding? We both agree it’s not against the law for these kids to receive this money. So why is the FBI involved. If I’m correct you’re saying because these kids are defrauding Universities like KU? The key point in your belief that makes me stick to the unpaid taxes on monies paid out by the Shoe companies? As you said from your own post The FBI says these students are hiding these payments. Meaning they’re not reporting to the IRS the money they are receiving from the shoe companies.
Can’t you at least see what I’m saying?
-
I do get what you are saying but the truth is we don’t know if the receiving parties are hiding the income from the government. Obviously they appear to be hiding it from the schools and that is a NCAA violation and if the schools want redress, Civil Court is the proper forum. Now, if they are hiding the income from the government then it should be the IRS that investigates, at least in the amounts quoted. I would prefer the FBI used its resources to follow leads on potential school shooters, something they failed to do and students got killed, instead of pursuing small time tax evaders…now, that is a real tragedy.
Just my opinion.
-
JayHawkFanToo said:
BShark said:
That said I’ve laid out some things in the past. Is it really worth rehashing? It doesn’t change anything. There is a reason Self has a reputation as dirty in coaching and recruiting circles.
Can you please cite reliable sources that indicate that Coach Self has a reputation as dirty in coaching and recruiting circles? Everything I have heard or read about him is the exact opposite.
There was a CBS poll last summer of “over 100” coaches regarding who is considered the “cleanest” college coach, and I was surprised Bill wasn’t among the coaches who got at least 5 votes.
Rank Coach School Percentage
-
John Beilein Michigan 26.6
-
Mike Brey Notre Dame 10.5
T3. Tony Bennett Virginia 7.6
Greg Gard Wisconsin 7.6
- Mark Few Gonzaga 5.7
T6. Chris Holtmann Ohio State 4.8
T6. Tom Izzo Mich State 4.8
T6. Bruce Weber K State 4.8
– Every coach listed received at least 5 votes
A thought or two on how methodology affects perception: First, as noted, the question posed was “who is the cleanest coach”, which means the voters had to vote for only one. HCBS (and many others) could be universally considered in the top 10, or top 5, or even 2, but his name would not appear in the survey if less than 5 did not consider him cleaner than all others. This is stupid, and misleading, because it does not provide any sense of overall reputations despite purporting to investigate that. (Beilein certainly stands out from the pack, though.)
Second, I suspect Izzo would not make the list now after the accusations and revelations of how he continued to play players accused of assault.
-
-
@DoubleDD The recipients of the payments would be subject to tax evasion charges, of course. James Gatto didn’t receive the payments. The assistant coaches didn’t receive payments. The only folks being charges are those that made the payments, or facilitated the payments. So this has zero to do with taxes – at the moment. It is alleged as a fraud case.
Tax evasion charges, when they arise, are usually occur as part of a scheme, or process that has taken place over time. Otherwise, it’s a internal IRS deal based on an audit or review.
However, I recognize that at some point that might be an issue for a recipient of the payment. It could come about to create leverage for testimony. But right now, it is not.
And unequivocally, without doubt, it is not the reason these charges were filed. You don’t file fraud charges against those that make the payments if your goal is to collect 15% and penalties on a $50,000 payment to an athlete that may go unreported (and, of course, 2017 tax returns aren’t even really due until October 15).
-
Did you catch Alan Dershowitz debating Adam Abrams on the Stephanopolous ABC show last Sunday?
Dershowitz, not a Trump fan, schools Abrams on the Special Counsel role and says something along the lines of… .you cannot target people and try to find crimes. I don’t want to bring politics to this discussion and I mentioned this video only to point out the eerie similarities of both cases and how the points Dershowitz makes could also apply to the FBI case against Adidas. Here are more comments by Dershowitzs on the special counsel that could also be made about the current FBI case. As I noted in another post, the special counsel did indict the proverbial ham sandwich when it indicted an company that did not exist at the alleged time of the crime…again, some similarity with the current indictment.
Again, this i not meant to be a political post but one to show the similarities between two misguided (in my opinion) investigations.
-
I’m not sure that each coach only voted for one person. It doesn’t specifically say that in the article, although to be perfectly fair, it doesn’t list the methodology at all. As a former researcher, that bothers me that it doesn’t explain whether they asked them for one name, their top three, or otherwise. It would make the numbers a lot easier to understand if that information were out there.
On the other hand, it is sort of implied that maybe there was only one vote per person, but again, its not clear either how the question was presented. Also, it appears they only considered P5 coaches, so coaches like Jay Wright and Mark Few would not have been eligible (not that they would have won), which makes this an even more confusing question to quantify.
-
@justanotherfan Not to be Mr. Negative, but unfortunately I would guess the squeaky cleanest of coaches in Div 1 have losing records and don’t last long.
-
I don’t think that’s negative. That’s (unfortunately) probably true.
-
@justanotherfan I mean negative in that as fans we would like to think it is all a level playing field. We would like our teams regardless of who we support to play by the rules and win.
-
@justanotherfan I thought the question was pretty clear:
“Who is the high-major coach you genuinely believe does everything by the book and operates completely within the NCAA’s rulebook?”
That isn’t in the plural.
-
@JayHawkFanToo in my opinion, you are the most opinionated poster.
-
@wissox NO
-
Crimsonorblue22 said:
@JayHawkFanToo in my opinion, you are the most opinionated poster.
Ouch…but seriously, aren’t we all opinionated? Isn’t this what a forum is all about, expressing our opinions? If you don’t agree with what I write you can always state your own opinion, right? Maybe you will convince me to see it your way.
-
@JayHawkFanToo you just say in my opinion, a lot. Not right or wrong, just an opinion.
-
@Crimsonorblue22 hey, I appreciate the qualification of it being his opinion. To me that seems more honest than stating his opinion as fact.
-
Type into Google “Is Kansas basketball dirty”. There’s a lot of people out there that believe we are to some degree.
-
wissox said:
Type into Google “Is Kansas basketball dirty”. There’s a lot of people out there that believe we are to some degree.
Exactly. Now obviously there is a bit of jealousy and you can’t believe everything but like I said before, KU basketball players aren’t hurting for anything while they are at KU.
-
Interesting article. I saw it at a link posted by @approxinfinity related to coach Self and the big 12 POY discussion. It was the story below it.
https://247sports.com/Article/Report-Rogue-agent-could-trouble-FBI-college-basketball-case-118462529
-
I see it this way:
Bill Self is guilty of jaywalking. Yes… technically… it is illegal.
Coaches like Rick Pitino, are guilty of manslaughter.
-
@drgnslayr Assumption here … what if Self learned of an Adidas payment to one of our former players, say Josh Jackson, after the fact. And didn’t report it? I think that’s a big deal from a rules violation standpoint. Assumption, of course. But that’s more the scenario I’m concerned about. Not that he had prior knowledge.
Further, the compilation of “knowledge” could be enough for the prosecutor to claim he’s part of a conspiracy. If he was aware of “the game” so to speak, and didn’t work to ensure that the University wasn’t “defrauded.” Ugh.
-
@HighEliteMajor is that different than what happened w/billy or cliff?
-
I hear what you are saying. I just don’t believe he would let it slide.
I don’t see him risking anything concerning his own reputation or the reputation of the university. And if the university and coaches previously knew nothing about a payment, we should be viewed as “victims” anyways.
If our coaching staff is clean, they should do everything to support their cleanliness. Coverups are usually where people screw up. If our coaches are willing to coverup something they previously knew nothing about… they take on risk for little or no gain.
-
Like any other business, everybody in the coaching business knows who the good and bad actors are and there is really not much that can be done other than to try to keep your own program clean.
I would suspect that most coaches insulate themselves from this type of knowledge about their own programs so they can have future plausible deniability.
I would venture to say that Coach Self is generally aware of what goes one but stays out of the details. I would also bet that he did not ask, approve or knew contemporaneously of any of these alleged payments just because of the potential damage to his legacy and “officially” learned about the actual payments at the same time we did.
Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made. - Otto von Bismarck
I think we can safely throw college sports recruiting in the same category.
-
My point being? is the only reason the FBI/Government got involved is because there is a lot of money being thrown around and they’re not getting their share. Think about it? What was the crime? What some kid and his folks/handlers lies to a university about receiving funds? You really think the FBI/government got involved because some kid lied to the his school of choice?
Last time I checked there is no law against a shoe company or any company throwing money at young men?
-
@DoubleDD If you really think this is about taxes, well, ok then. I have thought about. The theory that this is really about unpaid taxes is (respectfully) nonsensical, in my opinion. No other way to put it.
Your last sentence is telling. And I whole-heartedly agree. But the prosecutor, however, does not. He’s the guy that counts. The theory is fraud. Read the charging complaint at the link below.
And after you do, then let me know how many times you see the word “tax” or “taxes.”
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/press-release/file/999006/download
-
I get what you are saying but it certainly does not look like a tax issue to me. All Adidas has to say is that the money was a gift and the first $14,000 would excempt from taxes and the amount over that would be taxable. Considering that many of the recipients have low incomes, the difference might not be enought to be taxed or the tax would be at the lowest rate; in other words, the tax would be negligible to insignificant since it is not like one recipient got millions but a number of them got smaller amounts instead. One drug bust alone would represent orders of magnitude more money. I just can’t imagine the FBI getting involved for this little money, this is something that the IRS would pursue. BTW, the indictment does not mention tax evation at all.
To me, there is a bigger agenda that we still don’t know and tax evasion is not it. I would be curious to see what part of the argument above you think is incorrect.
-
@JayHawkFanToo Actually, I meant to post this long ago: Adidas, not the recipients of the money, would be liable for the gift tax. It is not like lottery or game-show winnings, which are considered income to winners.
-
In the last 20 years I have given gifts up to the limit on at least 4 occasions that I remember and every time, as directed by both accountants, I provided a letter to the recipient that the money was a gift which the recipient used for tax purposes. Since the gifts were by design at or just below the limit there was no tax liability anyway.
-
@JayHawkFanToo If those were gift letters for money to help someone buy a house, their use was simply to assure mortgagors that the money was not a loan. As for other recipients needing a gift letter, it would be to ensure the money did not get counted as income (and thus not be taxable), or raise questions about hidden income sources.
-
I know it appears I’m reaching a bit. Yet it is just in my experience when dealing with the Government and it’s agencies. It’s always about money. I mean they call it something else of course. They even paint a perception that their being heroes by righting the wrongs. Yet at the end of the day it’s always about the money.
Fraud is a Ying and Yang kind of issue when comes to the government. Is not the purpose of the FBI Involvement, is these kids are defrauding the Universities?
I’m sorry I just can’t buy that the FBI got all bent out of shape because these kids were defrauding Universities. No the real defrauding is a lot of money is getting tossed around and the Government isn’t getting their cut.
At the end of the day it’s just my opinion. However when this is all done. I’m willing to bet some persons/companies get charged with tax evasion. Yet I’ll remember as you said that this FBI investigation wasn’t about taxes/money.
-
DoubleDD said:
My point being? is the only reason the FBI/Government got involved is because there is a lot of money being thrown around and they’re not getting their share. Think about it? What was the crime? What some kid and his folks/handlers lies to a university about receiving funds? You really think the FBI/government got involved because some kid lied to the his school of choice?
Last time I checked there is no law against a shoe company or any company throwing money at young men?
What I don’t understand… why weren’t the feds in on the UNC academic fraud case?
Here is an example where a state-funded university had state-funded instructors committing a crime that defames all diplomas received by thousands of students.
-
@DoubleDD But also remember what I said … that using the IRS issues is a way to apply pressure. So while I don’t believe that was the impetus of the prosecution, I do think it could come up later as pressure is applied.
