When the Hurtin's Done, Give Us a Nike 5-star at the 5
-
That was really weird that Bragg did not play a minute vs Oregon. Anyone have a clue what was going on there?
-
@jaybate-1.0 none, I think if his 17 footer was falling he would’ve been useful. Coleby struggled like LL with just not being athletic enough against Oregon.
-
That was the hope before the season.
Man would a 5 that could knock down 17 footer have pulled Bell away from the iron!
-
-
@FarNrthJHwk yes Oregon has 5 star players. - - -ROCK CHALK ALL DAY LONG BABY
-
Dorsey maybe. The rest are 4 star types. Altman is a good coach.
-
@BShark ya, that’s the one I was talking about he is one - - -ROCK CHALK ALL DAY LONG BABY
-
A 5 star in his second year. Been awhile since KU had that.
-
@jaybate-1.0 and @Blown
I’m not blaming refs for our loss, so please don’t take it that way. 35% shooting and 20% from behind the arc will get you beat pretty handily every time by whoever the opponent happens to be.
I just find it interesting that in a game where only 26 total fouls are called, a guy who had 8 blocks, challenged many more shots, and was very active defensively comes away with only one whistle all night. (Bell was the only starter for both teams with fewer than 2 fouls, BTW).
Josh, meanwhile, gets two fouls in the first 2-minutes-plus of the game, the second of which came after a missed (and rather blatant) travelling violation. And he is the only player on either team to end the game with 4 fouls. Nobody else had more than 3.
Take from that what you will.
-
@tis4tim josh’s 2 fouls started the tightening-jmo. Tcu game part 2. Tait said before the game the team was loose, like they had been most of the year. I heard what frank said.
-
@BShark said:
Altman is a good coach.
I can’t speak objectively as to whether or not that is correct. I can, however quote Clark Griswold as to how I feel about Altman:
“…cheap, lying, no-good, rotten, four-flushing, low-life, snake-licking, dirt-eating, inbred, overstuffed, ignorant, blood-sucking, dog-kissing, brainless, d##kless, hopeless, heartless, fat-ass, bug-eyed, stiff-legged, spotty-lipped, worm-headed sack of monkey s##t he is!”
-
@Crimsonorblue22 said:
josh’s 2 fouls started the tightening-jmo. Tcu game part 2. Tait said before the game the team was loose, like they had been most of the year. I heard what frank said.
I heard Tait reported as such and I truly believe that the team was loose prior to tip. But I also think the psyche of the team did change after that second quick whistle on Josh.
After Josh picked up his second I felt it would be best to let him sit until half, especially since Vick did an admirable job filling in. If memory serves, we were only down a point at the 8-minute mark when Self put Josh back in. I’m no coach nor a genius basketball strategist by any stretch, but I felt that keeping Josh out until half, especially if we kept the game a one or two possession affair, would give him a clean slate mentally for the second half and we would have a totally fresh-legged Josh out there wreaking havoc. Putting him back in, I felt, made him worry too much about picking up a third before half. So, instead of playing with a free mind he was thinking too much about not fouling, rendering him less effective.
It’s all water under the bridge now, but you look at the box score and see 13 fouls called on each team and the result appears “fair”. But those two quickies on Josh undeniably changed the game and the mindset of our guys. That said, we still had our chances and many opportunities to take the game, but it didn’t happen. And so it goes.
-
Unfortunately I dont see any 5 star centers on KU’s horizon.
-
Why would they be that interested after Cliff/Diallo/Bragg? And I know Bragg isn’t a center. I hope Doke plays well next year.
-
@BShark The players or the coaches?
-
The handlers of the players. Probably zero chance KU ever lands another player from that shady basketball academy Cheick went to (if it’s still around). Stuff like that unfortunately sticks with a coach. For us as fans it is easy to look into why things happened the way they did but in recruiting perception is often reality. Hell Selby still gets brought up as we found out this year. Ridiculous really.
Hopefully recruiting picks up, a lot of good local ties in 19.
-
Exactly. Those blaming Self, or blaming KU players performances, are just venting and using them as excuses.
Emotional, unscientific minds and those with agendas resist reasoned forensic analysis with a passion, unless it confirms their biases; that’s why I sometimes wait a day or two to clarify and respond.
I made a living for a lot of years marshaling logic and riding facts and weeding out incompetent adversarial use of fact and occasional intentional misrepresentation with facts.
It’s kind of fun, because working with logic and facts and probabilities is sooooooo much easier than polishing turds.
Everytime you do it, you get better and it gets clearer. And since I am never wed to any hypothesis, I am always refining any time new evidence or logic manifests!
Yeeeeeeeee hawwwwww! Another great season survived and savored!!!
The older I get the sweeter each one is!
Polishing truth gets brighter
-
@jaybate-1.0 maybe it’s been asked, and I ask this out of ignorance, but how do Nike schools get the better talent? What’s the process?
-
I’m not blaming them either, but I think it’s interesting too.
But after the apparent Wisconsin-Duke refereeing and some other examples, I also can’t help but wonder if the refereeing would have gotten even more interesting in a closer game.
-
I’m not ready to give up on Bragg.
Otherwise, we shouldn’t want anymore of what might be called 5-star asterisks, if we can avoid having to sign them for numbers, as was the case in the past.
Non asterisk 5-stars is the mission.
Our on asterisk guys have blossomed at KU and done well in the NBA, thank you very much.
-
@chriz Nike AAU rep “Hey stud 14 year old kid. Would you like to come to an awesome camp and play in front of college coaches? You get to leave with a cool new jersey and a pair of brand new shoes for participating. Also, we would like to sponsor your AAU team or put you on a new AAU team with other studs. You and your family will get to travel all over the country for free and have a new pair of Nike’s every 3 months. Now, I’m not telling you that you have to go to a Nike school, but if you do and you make it pro it is much more likely that you will get a Nike endorsement deal because we like to take care of people loyal to us.”
14 year old stud “I’m taking my talents to Insert Nike School.”
-
@chriz It is also a huge selling point for KU. It is why we land studs. If one of our players gets drafted it is almost a 100% guarantee that Adidas signs them to an endorsement deal. T-Rob is like the only exception. He signed with Nike.
-
We will see what happens. I’d love for Bragg to succeed at KU though.
-
First, I am just a fan and can only speculate on what I’ve read and on appearances.
That said…
No apparent conspiracies involved IMHO.
Most of the power summer game teams, where most of the Top 100 recruits reputedly play are reputedly Nike sponsored. Players reputedly build informal relationships with Nike and related agents over a period of years in high school.
Nike reputedly holds the lion’s share of D1 college and college coaching contracts, also.
It’s just apparently informal networking and a numbers game.
Nothing more reputedly.
But it appears to adversely impact KU recruiting at certain positions and it’s depth.
Others want to impute conspiracies that just aren’t apparently there.
Conspiracy theory is for suckers.
Narratives are for suckers.
The agent end of things is less transparent and so inconclusive so far in Influence.
Hope that helps.
Whatever, IMHO, forget about ANY illegalities.
Rock Chalk!!!
-
Yes we will see what happens. A DNP was some kind of message.
-
@Kcmatt7 then I guess my next question is, what’s the advantage of Nike over Adidas? And how is that sold (from each camp) to the kid?
-
@jaybate-1.0 surely Bill has this all figured out as well right? Why doesn’t he switch to Nike if there’s such an advantage?
-
Spoke volumes.
-
Makes one wonder if Bragg violated curfew, set his mattress on fire at the Westin, or gave Bill the side-eye before Saturday’s game. Coach took pains to compliment Bragg after the Thursday night win when reporters were trying to focus on Coleby. Maybe he just felt Bragg was too soft for the likes of Bell that given day.
-
@chriz Well essentially it just comes down to numbers and money. Nike sponsors more teams and has better connections to both Colleges, NBA Scouts and Agents. For every 1 Adidas AAU player there are 10 Nike AAU players. So, Nike is going to have more top line recruits just based on the odds.
There is a lot more to it, but that is the gist.
-
First, as far as I know, if the school is brand X, then it’s coach is usually brand X. Someone correct me if I’m wrong. So: KU and Bill perhaps got their best offers from adidas. From what I can recall coaches haven’t broken ranks with their employers.
Bill supposedly harvests around $10M per year from Ball related income. Note: I believe this to be questionable and speculative, but I’ll use it for the sake of explaining some basic rough ideas.
Bill’s base salary is reputedly a meager $5M/yr.
Let’s pretend the other reputed $5M/yr apparently comes from OTHER BASKETBALL RELATED INCOME on the line items. There are reputedly several sources of other basketball related income, but the adidas line is reputedly: a.) significant; and b.) somehow informally linked to the university shoe contract MONEY, which is a big enough AMOUNT to fund the nonrevenue sports with out making the Chancellor beg more appropriations money from (and incur more political debts to ) legislators.
These linkages, plus the significant length of contracts makes jumping brands no small task.
Without putting too fine a point on it, apparently some universities are sometimes willing to take the biggest money shoe contract, even if it means less access to top 100 players, because of informal drivers shaping recruiting with this or that brand’s access and relations to players.
Agents reputedly complicate things. For example, players can’t have agents, but HC’s can have agents. Therefore, a coach’s agent for endorsement deals can hang around the players indirectly and informally building relationships. Some agents reputedly have more influence than others.
And agents can have incentivized relationships with agent runners and summer game coaches.
And then there are the relationships of shoe brands and agents with pro ball and the advertisers at the college and pro levels.
And then there are the intermittent dog fights among shoe brands trying to find stable, sustainable market volumes within their producer oligopoly. The EU goes into deep enduring recession. Adidas loses big EU sales. It tries to make up the loss by taking a larger market share from Nike. Nike counter moves.
Recruiting can thus become very complicated.
-
You’re right. It could be nothing, or something.
