💙❤️ Kansas vs Mizzou — 🌻 Game Thread Here ❤️💙
    KU Buckets
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Kansas Jayhawks Vs UConn Huskies Game Thread 12/2 8PM CT

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved KU Basketball / Other NCAAM
    uconnhuskiesbasketballgamechat
    414 Posts 33 Posters 3.3k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • drgnslayrD Offline
      drgnslayr
      last edited by

      First... I don't put our game with UCONN into any real context; UCONN is an aberration from the norm... I'd also, maybe put Houston in that same category. Those two coaches aren't standard issue... especially Hurley. Hurley is able to recruit a very specific player, just like Houston is with Sampson. I don't care how much money is offered... you won't go to UCONN unless you can stand the heat from Hurley. And your NBA draft stock will fall if you can't meet your commitment with him. You go to UCONN if you want to eat, breath, sleep, basketball. It isn't vastly different at Houston, but with a twist. Sampson looks for guys willing to fight if necessary. I'm not talking redneck basketball. I'm talking about guys who refuse to lose a rebound to anyone.

      College basketball is also a victim to our society. Even AI plays a part in this and probably more than I'm mentioning here. AI is quickly creating a world where college education doesn't mean what it used to mean. Half or more of the jobs that used to be available for college grads are vanishing and replaced with AI. So one of the transactional offerings of a school used to be the quality of education. And that may not be a consideration for 5-star recruits... just below that, it used to matter. Scratch that consideration. Get prepared, fans... college basketball will take yet another turn in the not to distant future when college admission standards are lowered to attract students because their enrollment numbers are about to crash. This also means, college sports will open up to a lot of players that previously couldn't make it past the academic bar.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • drgnslayrD Offline
        drgnslayr
        last edited by

        I have to admit... I envy Hurley and Sampson. Hurley isn't mentally sound. But when it comes to basketball... his direction, and Sampson's, is truly about player development. This is what I've been preaching in here for years, and we are just now starting to address it by hiring Vaughn. I already see a big difference in our play because Vaughn is cleaning up a lot of our play. This is a guy who really understands the game and I'm completely high on this guy and hope he becomes our next head coach, even if he isn't super young.

        We are on the subject of transactionalism in college basketball... what is it worth to offer the very best player development? I know many think negatively about youth and they are just looking for a fast, easy buck. That hasn't at all been my experience with youth players, especially the good ones. Most of these kids had to have some level of quality management to reach their current level. They also realize how they got there through hard word and development (good coaching). It's never too late to turn our basketball program into one focused on development, even if we are trying to recruit 5-star recruits. I guarantee everyone here, that DP is grateful for being able to develop with Vaughn.

        I know there are other guys out there. But I've always been high on John Lucas. I've experienced what he's done for many players, including our very own Tyshawn Taylor. We probably missed the boat a few years back when we probably could have hired Lucas for development, and brought his basketball to Lawrence. He is now very wedged into the Houston basketball community. But had we brought in Lucas, I doubt we would have signed Vaughn later. It is possible... that Vaughn is the next Lucas!

        approxinfinityA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • approxinfinityA Online
          approxinfinity @drgnslayr
          last edited by approxinfinity

          @drgnslayr i think we should talk about AI in the other place. My gut reaction is that AI is a distraction. Theoretically, AI should be a tool making everyone better at their jobs and not a replacement. If AI is trained on AI generated content it leads to model collapse. We are already seeing it.

          I think this is more smoke and mirrors to keep us off the scent of the giant enshittified corporations stuffing the pockets of their shareholders. Theyre happy to lay off half their work force for whatever reason.

          drgnslayrD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • drgnslayrD Offline
            drgnslayr @approxinfinity
            last edited by

            @approxinfinity

            I see it as the perfect tool for the corporate model. The corporate model is all about shareholder profits. Those go up when you can cut your workforce substantially without a loss, or possibly an increase, in production.

            I've spent the last 3 months working most of my time on several AI applications. It helped my productivity big time.

            approxinfinityA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • approxinfinityA Online
              approxinfinity @drgnslayr
              last edited by approxinfinity

              @drgnslayr i think what you are saying jives with what i am saying. I have no doubt corporations will lay people off rather than having them be more efficient at their jobs aided by AI. They will say that AI has made them redundant but this is a lie.

              T drgnslayrD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • T Offline
                Tallturd1 @approxinfinity
                last edited by

                @approxinfinity American workers have been the most efficient in the world for years. And the CEO and CFO will tell the truth that their only focus is to the stockholders. The US is addicted to low wages and always has been. When pay for performance and bonuses for management started in the early 70's and went viral in 1984 it's been pay and wealth disparity on steroids ever since. The efficiency has to improve YOY to keep the money flowing upward. It never stops. At one time it was legislated to avoid monopolies like Bell Telephone. In 1984 that all changed and it has evolved into three or four entities like JP Morgan Chase owning it all. It's the American Capitalist dream realized and it was inevitable. The media has been bought up into just a few companies like Sinclair, Disney and Murdock Media. All the big empires eventually start to decline and the US is no different. Just look how corrupt our national government and every state government is. You can't get elected without big money and you have sold your soul as the result. 1500 registered lobbyists per House and Senate member. We are being managed just like all of them. The fat dumb and happy American is not a complete lie. Enjoy your families love and warmth it's precious.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                • approxinfinityA Online
                  approxinfinity
                  last edited by

                  @tallturd1 I made a library flier; please come over and talk to me in the other place if you have ideas. Warning: I am an eternal optimist.
                  https://www.unshittified.club/topic/34/first-library-flier

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • T Offline
                    Tallturd1 @bskeet
                    last edited by

                    @bskeet I can't seem to get disheartened will this group for the same reasons you have listed here. Good reasoning.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • drgnslayrD Offline
                      drgnslayr @approxinfinity
                      last edited by

                      @approxinfinity

                      Looks like you PMd me, but it wouldn't let me access it.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • bskeetB Offline
                        bskeet
                        last edited by

                        Wrapping up my thoughts about the UCONN game....

                        It could have gone either way. I have relish the opportunity to face them on a neutral floor in March after this team has had a few months to gel with DP.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • T Offline
                          Tallturd1
                          last edited by

                          The BDP lovable team showed us they could hang with anyone we have encountered and beat good to very good teams like ND and Tenn. We are indeed entering a boiling soup of a conference schedule and playing our heart out would reap a successful season and a five or a six seed. If we now can field an absolutely enhanced lineup it's not hard to envision a 10-5 conference result. A 24-8 record could get us to a three seed and a better record like 26-6 would be a two seed.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post