Thoughts on Graham/Svi decision
-
I agree. The tournament was a NBA audition for Devonte and he passed with flying colors against MSU and Purdue but crashed and burned against Oregon. Had he had good games and continued playing well and KU made it to the finals, Devonte would have likely moved up to the top of second or bottom of first round and we are not having this conversation.
-
BTW the same person who said Graham was coming back (he has a source on the team) is saying that Svi will be going to the pro’s.
Self after the banquet said Svi should have an immediate decision soon, basically all but pointing to Svi at least testing the waters. Will be interesting to see if he gets invited to the Combine.
We’ll know soon enough
-
So no big announcements at the banquet last night on leaving or staying?
-
That is correct.
-
Svi leaving would make a ton of sense given the staff wants to add a post (Tilmon or Juiston) and a guard (they want Duval but it will end up being Allen imo).
No one else is really a candidate
Graham (Self is ecstatic he came back, starting PG)
Newman (key player, only other ball handler on the roster, starting 2G)
Vick (looking at a breakout year, likely the starting wing)
Cunliffe (just transferred in)
Garrett (FR with a bright future)
Preston (likely OAD, starting PF)
Udoka (has to stay, starting C)
Mitch (Program player, loves KU, Self just talked him up at the banquet)
KJ Lawson (just transferred in)
Dedric Lawson (just transferred in, starting PF in a year and a half)
Only other possibility I see is Coleby but the post is already thin so the only way I see Coleby getting processed is if the staff could land Tilmon AND Juiston.
-
Plus no offense to Svi at all but he is entirely replaceable by players already on the roster. It will be a bit spotty until Cunliffe is ready to go but Cunliffe and Vick is plenty at the wing. Imo we are definitely looking at Garrett being the 4th guard until Cunliffe is eligible.
-
@BShark I don’t know man. He hit a lot of threes for us, right up there with Devonte/Frank in terms of volume, and he had some key buckets in the Kentucky win and in the tourney. I think he’d be missed. Of course, Bill would develop someone else, but Svi is still poised to do good things for us next year.
-
I don’t know if I agree with you. Svi has progressed every year he has played and last season he was a pretty solid contributor and I am expecting his senior year to be a breakout year when he put every phase of his game together and has a great season. Sure, I would take a freshman like Josh Jackson but there are not that many Josh Jacksons out there so I rather have senior Svi over just about any incoming freshman.
-
@JayHawkFanToo While I hope he does stay, I would argue that his progression has been very modest - and, disappointing relative to expectations. Shooting from the perimeter was streaky at best and while he is capable of driving and scoring, he did it to infrequently. More problematically, he really didn’t contribute much elsewhere. Terrible rebounder for a wing of his size (same issue with Selden last year) and surprisingly few assists for someone who is a good passer and at least decent ball handler. He seemed to defer a lot; maybe that would change with another year, but perhaps not with more alphas on the way?
-
I have no problems with any player exploring his options. If Svi gets a combine invite, he can get even more detailed evaluation and make a more informed decision. I hope he stays, but I will never have an issue with a player taking advantage of the rules.
-
I’m saying he would make the most sense if the staff felt they needed room. Like I said earlier I think the staff was prepared for him to leave given that they took on two more wings in recruiting.
He definitely hit some threes, but Svi giveth and Svi taketh away seemed to be how it worked last year. He wasn’t particularly efficient nor was he good defensively. The team really wasn’t as a whole, but I think he was pretty easily the worst defender that played major minutes. He was, essentially, marginally better than Vick offensively. He simply shot a lot more threes than Vick, so he had more points.
I think Svi/Vick/Cunliffe are all fairly marginal wings (at least, compared to what we’ve been spoiled with in X, Wiggs, Oubre and Josh). I don’t think any of them is more likely to break out than the other next year. Though I am the most intrigued by Cunliffe simply because he was surrounded by worse talent at ASU than he will be at Kansas.
I’m not convinced Svi particular progressed much from he SO to JR year so much as he simply played more, therefore more stats. If you extrapolate his SO numbers, it’s not a stretch to say he could have reached his JR numbers that year with more playing time.
All that said, I’m not opposed to Svi returning (not that my opinion on it really matters) and I wish him the best regardless of what he decides.
-
And yeah count me in the group that believes Oubre simply didn’t play enough. He was one of the three best players on that team (with Mason and Perry). His minutes should have more or less been flip-flopped with Selden’s minutes that year. That and Jamari over Cheick (at least early on) are probably the last things Self has done that I strongly disagreed with. Not sure Self ever really figured out that team, the minute distribution was really weird, like he was throwing stuff at the wall to see what would stick. Too many options I guess. Anyway, weird tangent over.
-
@BShark I thought the same thing.
-
I think Oubre kind of gets lost in the shuffle but he was pretty damn good. Would have been special if he stuck around. Not surprised he has stuck in the league so far. Playing this year too, about 20 minutes a night and almost every game.
I wish BMac was at a better franchise than the friggin Kings.
-
@BShark Are we signing Shakur?
-
@BShark thought oubre could have put out more effort, especially in that wsu game. Ben Mac deserves so much better! Love that kid!
-
@KUSTEVE he’s going to ISU this weekend. He will sure help them out. I hope we get him.
-
@KUSTEVE isu. Can’t edit or barely reply w/out a lot of effort
-
@KUSTEVE said in Thoughts on Graham/Svi decision:
@BShark Are we signing Shakur?
Feels like the staff would take the first to commit between Shakur and Tilmon.
@Crimsonorblue22 said in Thoughts on Graham/Svi decision:
@KUSTEVE he’s going to is this weekend. He will sure help them out. I hope we get him.
Yep. I hope he doesn’t commit on the visit.
-
@BShark In your opinion who would help KU more Tillman or Shakur? Will Tillman play more than 2 seasons?
-
Tough question. They are both so different. I’d love to get both and not have say Coleby. But saying that’s impossible, I’d prefer Tilmon. If we were assured 3+ seasons out of Tilmon, the decision is even easier. Tilmon will just be such a defensive presence.
-
ISU board talked about Shakur not being the type to commit on a visit. KU wanted him to visit this weekend but he already had the ISU visit lined up. They think he’ll visit KU next weekend. Maybe we get the last visit and can have the lasting impression?
ISU has beat us to the punch every step of the way with his recruitment. ISU board has been stressing that relationships are key with him from what his Hutch coaches say (Shakur doesn’t talk much about recruiting) and ISU has basically been there a lot and he’s noticed. That’s what they are saying.
Obviously ISU insider is going to paint ISU’s approach but everyone knows KU got into this late and its going to come down to what situation he wants more.
The Hutch coaches think he wants to win and make the NCAA tourney, something he’ll get at KU. ISU is on some transfers but this team is going to be on the bubble all year with them losing so much from this years squad. Shakur can start at ISU and have little resistance for playing time but won’t win as much. At KU he could carve out a rotation and we all know the situation is bigger and better.
-
Grudgingly I’d say Tilmon. I think the difference maker is length. You plug Tilmon into the rotation behind Doke and this team always has a defensive presence on the court. A presence that’s likely to be the difference in a March game when we need our big’s to produce.
I love Shakur’s game and I think he’s a A++ character player that has a chip on his shoulder. He also has a unique skill set for a big (well 6’7) player that could absolutely thrive at KU. The fact that he’s 6’7 and we already have Lightfoot at similar height makes it hard to add a 2nd shorter big.
Shakur is a superior athlete that does play bigger then his height so its hard to knock him just because he’s shorter. I think he’ll provide weak-side rim protection and be a great glue guy that plays for the team. His vision is also something that can’t be overlooked especially for a front court player that can be counted on to be unselfish with the ball.
Shakur is the more ready all around player if his elite rebounding and passing skills translate immediately.
But Tilmon offers the length and defensive presence that this team needs to truly be a complete team.
-
I guess it boils down to whether he wants to be the big fish in the small pond or the little fish in the big pond. No doubt he would get considerably more playing time at ISU but the team is in full rebuild mode and should be middle of the pack at te best in the Conference. KU will be favorite to win the conference and will be top 5 all year but his playing time will be much less.
Shakur is the stereotype of the “tweener,” not big enough to play PF and not good enough shooter to play SF. Yes, he played PF and even Center in JuCo but Division I is a huge step up and it is hard to tell how he will fare against better competition. Tilmon is bigger but younger and with zero college experience, probably a wash between them.
-
Yep! PF in a wing’s body.
I would favour Tilmon because he has more time to develop whereas we know what Juiston is at this point more or less. If we are purely talking about next year only then I would say it’s tougher to call.
-
@BShark I suppose you have to look at both. Next year being more important than 2 years from now given Graham’s return.
I’m more impressed with production than potential. Particularly if you are talking NBA protential. Sounds like Tilmon may be the better option in year 2, but year one Juiston motor and maturity may give him the edge?
-
I think Svi’s age has to be remembered in all of this. He is still very young. Isn’t he about Josh’s age?
