Wilson to Kansas
-
@FarmerJayhawk Tristan isn’t younger than most freshmen. Most freshmen, including athletes, enter college at 18. The only freshmen he’s a year young than are the players who went the prep school route to boost their grades or exposure. He’s young for the grade level, but not for being a freshman.
Looking at his videos, I also call BS on him having a 7-1 wingspan. He’s at most a +2" in wingspan from his height. Only way he has a 7-1 wing span would be if he had short legs and he definitely doesn’t have short legs, he’s got long legs. Every HS scouting report on Tristan lists length as being average. That means there’s no way he’s +4" or +5" in wingspan from his height.
With a different roster composition, Tristan could be a stretch 4, but with Jalen Wilson in the mix, Self won’t play both of them at the same position. Jalen Wilson is nowhere near good enough with the ball in his hands to play on the perimeter. Jalen is also going to fill out much larger than Tristan will. Jalen is going to fill out at 235 lbs. or so. Those two factors are why Jalen will be the stretch 4 for the future and Tristan Enaruna will be the 3 of the future.
-
Two years from now, KU’s starting line up is probably Issac McBride, DaJuan Harris, Tristan Enaruna, Jalen Wislon, and David McCormack.
-
Texas Hawk 10 said:
Two years from now, KU’s starting line up is probably Issac McBride, DaJuan Harris, Tristan Enaruna, Jalen Wislon, and David McCormack.
That team would be salty as hell, especially when you factor in OAD going away.
You’d have a guy in Harris that projects an en elite ball handler, a combo guard with PG potential and elite shooter in McBride, a rangy do it all wing, potential great shooting stretch 4 and a behemoth SR C. Hope it comes to fruition.
-
Oh, no, no … we’ll have a Grimes, or an Alexander, or an Oubre to save the day. Or will we?
-
Texas Hawk 10 said:
@FarmerJayhawk KU has Enaruna listed at 6-8, when has KU ever listed someone as being shorter than they really are?
Wiggs and Joel come to mind. Wiggs was listed at 6’8 but is really 6’9. Jo was at least 7’1 at KU. These from measurements taken by NBA teams right after the season. Frank was listed at 5’11 but measured 6’0 at the combine. Cliff was 6’8 at KU but nearly 6’9 at the combine. I just report what the good people at KU tell me.
Right, most freshmen turn 19 during their freshman year. Tristan won’t until he’s a sophomore. Just as a couple examples, Devon Dotson is 22 months older than Enaruna and just a single class ahead. David McCormack is 23 months older (actually 23 months and 3 weeks). I’m sure if you looked down the classes you’d find similar results. I know Josh Jackson turned 20 while at KU, and didn’t go to prep school. You may be thinking of academic “redshirting,” which is definitely a thing for athletes. Enaruna would’ve been a prime candidate had he grown up in the states.
-
@FarmerJayhawk Tristan is not entering college a year early. This is a case where you have to know what the rules and laws are when it comes to enrolling kids in school and that varies from state to state. Everywhere has a specific date that’s used to determine when kids start school. It is typically one of two dates, either August 1 or September 1. Academic years typically begin in August or September and run through the conclusion of summer sessions. Tristan Enaruna will turn 19 before the start of his sophomore year which would be next August/September depending on when classes start at KU. Tristan Enaruna is one of the youngest players in the class, he’s not young for the class. Tristan is not in the same category as Svi who did skip a grade and enrolled at KU a year earlier than normal.
In the case of Josh Jackson’s age, he did begin college at 19. Jackson was 1 year and 4 months older than Tristan Enaruna when Jackson started college. Josh Jackson failed 8th grade, that’s why he began college at 19 despite not going to prep school. Had John Jackson not failed 8th grade and graduated on time, he would’ve been 4 months older than Enaruna is when he started college.
Devon Dotson is a year older than most because of Illinois and how their education system worked at the time. I know Dotson graduated school in North Carolina, but he lived in Illinois when he started school and that’s the relevant part to why he’s older. Prior to 2014, the mandatory enrollment age for children in Illinois was when the child turned 7 between September 1 and August 31.
In the case of David McCormack, he did go to prep school (Oak Hill) so that’s simple enough to explain his age.
All 3 of those players were one academic year older than most entering college for 3 different reasons. One failed, one lived in a state with a later enrollment age than most states, and one was a prep school kid.
So no, Tristan Enaruna is not entering college a year early like Svi did.
-
Tristan is going to be a young freshman, considering the current landscape of college basketball.
The rest we will just have to wait to see.
-
@Texas-Hawk-10 right. I’ve actually done some interesting regression discontinuity about outcomes for the kids on the border and looked at effects of a month difference in enrollment age. Makes a difference for sure. Which is why so many athletes are held back a year, and makes Tristan young for a freshman, just like Grimes was last year.
Oak Hill isn’t a prep school, it’s just grades 8-12. IMG has a postgrad program though.
That’s true, but don’t say they all went to prep school as a postgrad when none did. The only guys we’ve had go that route were Frank and Devonte off the top of my head.
-
@FarmerJayhawk Oak Hill is a is prep school unless their own website’s description of the school is false. So Dave did go to a prep school. The reason Oak Hill grew into a basketball factory is because they don’t have to worry about their students meeting NCAA eligibility requirements because their academics far surpass a lot of prep school’s out there.
“Since 1878, Oak Hill Academy has transformed the lives of hundreds of unmotivated students. In the heart of the beautiful Blue Ridge Mountains, our small, co-ed, college preparatory boarding school combines structure with self-reliance, discipline with discovery, and a firm hand with a warm heart. Our curriculum challenges the brightest students and encourages those who are unmotivated or experiencing difficulty in their current school setting. Our structured and relational environment is the opportunity for students to redefine themselves in very positive ways. Attending Oak Hill is a turning point.”
Very simply, let’s pretend Tristan isn’t an athlete a d is just a regular student like 99% of the people at KU are. KU’s academic year begins with the fall semester around Labor Day and ends with the second summer session in July. A traditional freshman student will turn 19 some time between those start and end dates. Since Tristan Enaruna will be 19 before the fall 2020 semester begins, he is in the correct academic class for his age group. He is among the youngest in his age group, but he is still in the correct academic year for his age group.
-
@Texas-Hawk-10 prep school isn’t postgrad. They don’t have a postgraduate basketball program. Full stop. In education, folks conflate the two a lot, but they are different. Many charter schools are “prep schools” since they focus on preparing kids for college but only have up to grade 12 and don’t accept students that already have enough credits to graduate high school. Oak Hill does not accept postgrads, though it is a prep school in that it prepares students for college.
Glad we agree. Tristan is by definition young for his class, like I’ve said from the beginning.
-
@FarmerJayhawk Where your wrong is saying Tristan won’t 19 until his sophomore year. That is a false statement. Tristan’s sophomore year will not begin until the fall 2020 semester and he will be 19 by that point.
Your initial comments on the matter were putting Tristan in the same category as Svi or Doke who each entered college and played their freshmen seasons as 17 year olds.
-
@Texas-Hawk-10 He’ll be classified as a sophomore come June summer courses. I said he was young for his grade, which is true since many if not most high major players are held back a year for various reasons. We’re arguing semantics at this point and getting nowhere. Point is he’s young for his class and will develop more than most players. That’s it.
-
I’m sure you are right and there is the possibility of 3 RSs. I’d be surprised to see more than 2, even a bit shocked at 2.
It is a nice thought to see us farming players in the system. In theory, it seems an advantage to have players with more experience on “Self-ball” and taking advantage of our HOFr. The counter to that is if they have enough upside to help us become a contender.
I flip back and forth on what is our best recruiting strategy. Never been for a revolving door team, but usually liked having one or two OADs. Recently, I’ve come to liking the idea of no OAD-types. Just think they prevent us from really bonding as a team. They are looked at as different and receive way too much attention apart from everyone else.
I like the idea where we could always have a few players that are 4 yr seniors, maybe even with a RS 5th year. But even that is hard to project in today’s game because so many players transfer now.
I’m glued to the concept that our focus needs to be on maximizing the development of players and then putting energy into selling that plus to future recruits. Through this concept we should be able to separate ourselves from the rest of D1. Use our blue blood status in this direction versus just recruiting the presumed highest skill players.
-
@FarmerJayhawk He’s not young for his class though. He’s the normal age for his class. Young for his class would be a Svi or a Doke who were so young, neither were eligible to be a OAD. Each had to be a KU two years before being eligible to even declare for the NBA draft. Tristan doesn’t face that hurdle, he’s eligible to declare for the NBA draft if he chose to do so.
It’s not semantics because Tristan isn’t young for the class he’s in. He’s young within his class. There’s a big difference there. The kids that enter college at 19 are doing so because almost all of them had some issue that forced them to be held back a year at some point. That’s not normal.
-
@drgnslayr I think our recruiting this year was fantastic. The longevity factor is real high for this group. Not any of them are going to the NBA anytime soon. None of our recruits will start. They are going to really soak it up, and be our core for the next several years. It’s a beautiful thing to recruit a class w/o a OAD, isn’t it?
-
@Texas-Hawk-10 Yes, he is young for his class. It’s all semantics: young for his class meaning months younger than the average person to graduate high school from a normal high school in May 2019. It’s perfectly normal language in education. We often use young/old for a class to talk about kids who are in the top or bottom 10%-ish of the age distribution within a grade, since you’d expect kids born in May of year X to be behind kid Y born in August year X-1 because they’re 9 months apart in age. Same phrasing we use to describe height. You’d say, “this kid is short for his age,” not “he’s short within all human beings age 12.” They mean the same thing. Given a distribution of any continuous measure with sufficient sample size (e.g. height, age) there are people in the tails of the distribution. Saying someone is old, young, tall, or short for their age or height only implies they’re in the tail of a given distribution, not that they belong in a different distribution altogether (e.g. 10th vs. 11th grade). To bring this back to reality, Tristan is in the left tail of the age distribution for the HS class of 2019. The most common requirement by far is age 5 by 9/01 of the school year. Tristan was only 2 months in change ahead of the cutoff, so there just aren’t many kids younger than him starting college this fall, and the athlete group skews a bit older still. That’s all I’ve ever said.
Doke is probably a year or two older than he’s listed, but that’s a different conversation.
-
@FarmerJayhawk Yeah, Dok is every bit 30 years old
…
-
@Marco probably past his prime tbh
-
Read the story at KUSports about how it’s going with summer gym play. The feeling is way different this year. These guys are gelling the right way… a very competitive, upbeat bunch.
Think I’d have to go back to 2008 to see a group this well connected, and the right way. 2012 was close, but the TRob tragedy made it tough for them to be this positive.
-
@drgnslayr That article blew me away. Just the stark difference Ochai described between last year and this year…that within itself tells you all you need to know about last year AND this year.
“Our summer’s been way different, especially from last year,” said sophomore guard Ochai Agbaji. “It’s just a different vibe. A lot of guys, we’re going after each other every day to make each other better and I think that’s something that’s going to make us better later on in the season.”
-
While I’m very high on this year’s team, sometimes all of the apparent positives don’t translate to winning. We started off 10-0 last season. We had good pieces. We knew how to win when at full strength. We won close games, again at full strength. Sometimes teams that seem well bonded, work hard, etc., don’t find ways to win. That dynamic is tough to put a finger on sometimes. Of course, sometimes they do have that dynamic.
I guess what I would say is that until we see how they perform together, in game situations, it’s still very hard to tell. And very importantly, until we see how they handle late game situations, we just won’t know. In CBB, those late game situations are the critical piece. At least we know we have a coach that has that element as a major strength.
But enthusiasm seems very well placed.
This is a terrific roster. Seems like a perfect fit for our coach (except for perhaps a speed guy who could handle the ball starting at the two spot alongside Dotson). But I ain’t complainin’.
-
@HighEliteMajor You’re right. It could be 2008…or it could be 2007. Two great teams…two different outcomes.
-
I know we need to keep our expectations realistic.
But I also think, especially this year, we need to really get behind our fellas 100%. There are a few fans still stuck on last year. Records are meant to be broken, they are also made to reach an endpoint. That was a great run and now we can set our eyes on breaking it again!
In this case, I think we can just follow the spirit of the team and give them back what they are bringing in to this year’s team. It’s a group that hungers to win… staying positive… and working hard. Focused… very focused. And we will see, but I bet they are resilient and a loss here or there will just make them bear down harder!
It starts with Devon. That’s his outlook. It was last year, too, but he didn’t know how to accomplish everything in his first year. He is not prepared to have another frustrating year. I feel comfortable saying these things to a guy like Devon because he isn’t looking for an ego boost. He’s the real deal.
-
The ceiling for this team is a national title contender. That’s assuming everything goes well. That said, there’s legitimate issues this team will have to overcome to reach their ceiling. Some of those issues are within the players control and some are not.
Team chemistry absolutely should be better this year without Vick in the mix. The counterpoint is we don’t know yet how well Isaiah Moss will fit in on the court with this group yet because he’s still finishing up academic stuff at Iowa. This is a question because Moss is the one newcomer who will be playing big time minutes this year and potentially be a starter for this team.
The next issue is shooting. Bill Self did a great job of bringing in players who can develop into great shooters. That’s great for the future, but doesn’t necessarily help with the upcoming season though. @BShark posted some stats from the scrimmages this summer and while not definitive in any way, can give some insight into progress being made. Dotson appears to have some gains, Silvio and Dave don’t have three point range (I’ll touch more on that later), Agbaji looks like he’s still struggling from deep, McBride could earn some quality minutes with his shooting. Overall, with the three point line being scooted back, it looks like this team may be slightly better from deep than last year, but still nothing to brag about.
I mentioned Dave and Silvio’s lack of shooting from outside, this is critical because it means neither really needs to be guarded closely outside of about 10’. That means opposing post defenders will be able clog driving lanes more effectively which will significantly hurt Devon, Ochai, and Garrett. Their effectiveness on offense is predicated by their abilities to drive into the paint. With those driving lanes clogged, the offense could actually take a step back this year because last year, Lawson was at least good enough from 3 that teams had to respect him out there. That doesn’t appear to be the case with Silvio or McCormack at this point. I’ve said it before but, I’ll say it again, this is a team that’s going to play a lot of games in the 60’s this season because of their offense.
The next area is defense. On paper, this appears to be the area where KU will make the biggest gains from last season. The combination of Doke, Silvio, and McCormack anchoring the paint is going to make life in the paint very difficult for a lot of teams. The concern with those 3 defensively is rebounding. Silvio is an above average rebounder so there shouldn’t be an issues there, but Doke and Dave are not. Doke is a below average rebounder for his size and McCormack is just bad at rebounding for his size. Each are still doing a lot work on their bodies, so there is hope in that regard, but I wouldn’t expect dramatic changes out of either of them though.
On the perimeter, the 4 guys who should get most of the minutes are all above average to elite defenders. Marcus Garrett is the best defender in the Big 12, end of discussion. Devon Dotson has the abilities to be an all-Big 12 defender. Moss and Agbaji are also both above average defenders. On paper, this is the best defensive team Self has had since the 2012 runner up team.
Those are all the things this team can control, the one thing they can’t control and is the most concerning to me is health. Health is the one thing that can quickly derail everything this team has worked for (as we saw last season) and there legitimate reasons to worry about the health of this team.
Doke has never played a full season. We can say the wrist injuries were flukes and they sort of were, but Doke is definitely not the only person to get his hand caught in something and most people come away unscathed. Doke hasn’t twice now. Doke also missed the B12 tournament in 2018 because of knee issues. Doke is a very large human being and for being as young as he is, his muscles, joints, tendons, and ligaments don’t seem strong enough yet to support his frame. Doke making it through the season healthy is probably the single biggest individual factor in determining how far this Kansas team can go in the NCAA tournament.
That said, Doke isn’t the only player whose health is a concern going forward. Marcus Garrett said in the middle of the Summer that he still wasn’t a 100% from his high ankle sprain last year. Being brutally honest, if Garrett lost some quickness because of this and loses some of his defensive abilities, he very quickly becomes a pretty useless player to Kansas.
The other player with injury concerns is Ochai Agbaji. Are his shin issues chronic or a one time deal? If they are chronic and he loses his athleticism, he essentially falls into the same category as Garrett because Agbaji’s game is based on his athleticism. Without his athleticism, he’s not anything special.
Again, this ceiling of this team is national championship contender, but there are hurdles this team will have to clear to reach that ceiling and some of those hurdles are ones KU cannot control.
-
Lots of “ifs” and rightly so.
Many of these concerns boil down to coaching and the players. The feel is different this year and I feel like this group will buy in much quicker to Selfball.
We often have a player or two that brings in mixed energy. I’m hoping that won’t be the case this year. It’s a huge factor.
I have no problem if we end a lot of games in the 60’s… as long as our opposition is in the 50’s. We have that potential if this team buys in early to Selfball.
I think Marcus will recover to maybe high 90% this year. Hopefully enough to keep his quickness. And I hope he makes a complete recovery, but you just can’t count on that type of injury ever healing back to 100%. The key is Marcus stays hungry. Players learn throughout their career to play with deficits. It’s their competitiveness that keeps them at a high level. Always. Actually… I’d like to see his gains in basketball IQ. If that happens he’s fine to be at 90+% and will show us huge improvement.
If the team stays focused as a positive, hardworking team, they will advance much quicker than we are used to. In past years we’ve even experienced teams moving backwards at some point. I don’t really see this happening because of positive leadership. I feel like this team has several players leading. If so, all the players will be kept in line.
I just keep hope this team has a great year. National Championship? Of course I’d like to see that but I don’t want to openly talk about it because it puts too much unneeded stress on our guys. Let’s just let them be. They don’t need any of us loading up on their expectations. This may be the only team I’ve seen under Self that truly is “Self” motivated!
-
Texas Hawk 10 said:
The ceiling for this team is a national title contender. That’s assuming everything goes well. That said, there’s legitimate issues this team will have to overcome to reach their ceiling. Some of those issues are within the players control and some are not.
Team chemistry absolutely should be better this year without Vick in the mix. The counterpoint is we don’t know yet how well Isaiah Moss will fit in on the court with this group yet because he’s still finishing up academic stuff at Iowa. This is a question because Moss is the one newcomer who will be playing big time minutes this year and potentially be a starter for this team.
The next issue is shooting. Bill Self did a great job of bringing in players who can develop into great shooters. That’s great for the future, but doesn’t necessarily help with the upcoming season though. @BShark posted some stats from the scrimmages this summer and while not definitive in any way, can give some insight into progress being made. Dotson appears to have some gains, Silvio and Dave don’t have three point range (I’ll touch more on that later), Agbaji looks like he’s still struggling from deep, McBride could earn some quality minutes with his shooting. Overall, with the three point line being scooted back, it looks like this team may be slightly better from deep than last year, but still nothing to brag about.
I mentioned Dave and Silvio’s lack of shooting from outside, this is critical because it means neither really needs to be guarded closely outside of about 10’. That means opposing post defenders will be able clog driving lanes more effectively which will significantly hurt Devon, Ochai, and Garrett. Their effectiveness on offense is predicated by their abilities to drive into the paint. With those driving lanes clogged, the offense could actually take a step back this year because last year, Lawson was at least good enough from 3 that teams had to respect him out there. That doesn’t appear to be the case with Silvio or McCormack at this point. I’ve said it before but, I’ll say it again, this is a team that’s going to play a lot of games in the 60’s this season because of their offense.
The next area is defense. On paper, this appears to be the area where KU will make the biggest gains from last season. The combination of Doke, Silvio, and McCormack anchoring the paint is going to make life in the paint very difficult for a lot of teams. The concern with those 3 defensively is rebounding. Silvio is an above average rebounder so there shouldn’t be an issues there, but Doke and Dave are not. Doke is a below average rebounder for his size and McCormack is just bad at rebounding for his size. Each are still doing a lot work on their bodies, so there is hope in that regard, but I wouldn’t expect dramatic changes out of either of them though.
On the perimeter, the 4 guys who should get most of the minutes are all above average to elite defenders. Marcus Garrett is the best defender in the Big 12, end of discussion. Devon Dotson has the abilities to be an all-Big 12 defender. Moss and Agbaji are also both above average defenders. On paper, this is the best defensive team Self has had since the 2012 runner up team.
Those are all the things this team can control, the one thing they can’t control and is the most concerning to me is health. Health is the one thing that can quickly derail everything this team has worked for (as we saw last season) and there legitimate reasons to worry about the health of this team.
Doke has never played a full season. We can say the wrist injuries were flukes and they sort of were, but Doke is definitely not the only person to get his hand caught in something and most people come away unscathed. Doke hasn’t twice now. Doke also missed the B12 tournament in 2018 because of knee issues. Doke is a very large human being and for being as young as he is, his muscles, joints, tendons, and ligaments don’t seem strong enough yet to support his frame. Doke making it through the season healthy is probably the single biggest individual factor in determining how far this Kansas team can go in the NCAA tournament.
That said, Doke isn’t the only player whose health is a concern going forward. Marcus Garrett said in the middle of the Summer that he still wasn’t a 100% from his high ankle sprain last year. Being brutally honest, if Garrett lost some quickness because of this and loses some of his defensive abilities, he very quickly becomes a pretty useless player to Kansas.
The other player with injury concerns is Ochai Agbaji. Are his shin issues chronic or a one time deal? If they are chronic and he loses his athleticism, he essentially falls into the same category as Garrett because Agbaji’s game is based on his athleticism. Without his athleticism, he’s not anything special.
Again, this ceiling of this team is national championship contender, but there are hurdles this team will have to clear to reach that ceiling and some of those hurdles are ones KU cannot control.
Great post … I’ll amend to say our ceiling is national title winner, but that’s nit-picking. I feel confident, as well, that if Doke does get hurt, this team can still win the national title. The only truly indispensable player for that pursuit is Dotson, in my opinion.
-
Here is a sign I will be looking for this year… I’m looking for games to start out a lot different.
Think back to last year. How many games did we get out of the blocks fast? Right… very few. And we often struggled to beat teams that were far inferior. We really drug out 20+ victory season over the finish line.
That is not Kansas basketball. And I’ve seen this behavior often in several of our recent teams.
This year I am hoping to see us get out quickly on teams. And if we aren’t scoring a lot, then we are shutting them down from the opening whistle.
Up to this point, we have a team that has the drive. They will be excited to get out and on the court and play while in the locker room before the game. Motivated.
This is the key factor I will be looking for early in the year and with the hope we carry it out all year.
Factor two will be endurance. Can we keep the pressure on. Will we have a killer instinct, or not? Another trait we truly missed last year.
-
@Texas-Hawk-10 Moss played with Devon growing up. I think he’ll adjust.
-
I’ve never been so opinionless on a KU basketball team. I just have too many questions.
Will Ochai get back to how he started?
Can Garrett improve enough offensively that we can space the floor?
How good is Moss going to be?
How good is Silvio going to be?
How good is Dave going to be?
Can Wilson handle playing the 4 in college? Or will Mitch still have to be the 4th big?
Is Harris a more capable backup PG than McBride?
Is McBride such a good shooter he needs minutes at the 2?
Does Enaruna get any run? Or is he still trying to figure it all out?
Do we start our best defensive lineup? Or do we throw Moss in there to give us a shooter?
What pace do we want to play at? Or will the tempo change based on who is on the floor?
Will we play much small ball at all?
I’ll have to wait until exhibition games I think before I can make any sort of declarative statement.
-
@Kcmatt7 If you can answer all those questions after an exhibition game, ESPN should be paying you $$$ for color commentary!
-
@Kcmatt7 Hmmm. Here’s a question that can help with your opinion, this year in particular – Who is our coach? Given the structure of this team, I have great confidence that it’s going to be highly positive. Knowing our coach, and what he’s proven in the past, the pieces that Self has (and their skill sets) makes this a really good match. That why I’m optimistic. I view this as a near perfect fit. Not perfect – perfect would be a major league ball handler at the two spot. But pretty stout.
My main concern is speed of play and ball handling. Because if there is no back up PG ready to play (shaky with the ball/TO machine, etc), we change dramatically when Dotson is off the floor. Slower play with Garrett in that role and a much different dynamic on the offensive end. This could create a lot of vulnerability.
-
ajvan said:
@Kcmatt7 If you can answer all those questions after an exhibition game, ESPN should be paying you $$$ for color commentary!
Lol I mean you’ll be able to see enough to know whether your assumptions were way off or not. And some of the minutes distributions will answer a few questions alone.
-
HighEliteMajor said:
@Kcmatt7 Hmmm. Here’s a question that can help with your opinion, this year in particular – Who is our coach? Given the structure of this team, I have great confidence that it’s going to be highly positive. Knowing our coach, and what he’s proven in the past, the pieces that Self has (and their skill sets) makes this a really good match. That why I’m optimistic. I view this as a near perfect fit. Not perfect – perfect would be a major league ball handler at the two spot. But pretty stout.
My main concern is speed of play and ball handling. Because if there is no back up PG ready to play (shaky with the ball/TO machine, etc), we change dramatically when Dotson is off the floor. Slower play with Garrett in that role and a much different dynamic on the offensive end. This could create a lot of vulnerability.
Oh I love the gritty somewhat ego-less team. It is right in Bill’s wheelhouse. And the regular season is all but guaranteed to be a success under him.
My concerns lie with how well this team is built for the tournament.
In my mind, there are a few ways the season could go.
-
Our bricklaying starting lineup couldn’t come at a better time. With the 3pt line getting pushed further back, Doke, Dave and De Sousa will be an unstoppable trio in a season where the 3 pointer hasn’t been adjusted to and the big man is reborn. This could make us NC good.
-
Our bricklaying starting lineup gets exposed in the 3 point era. And we get exposed once again. Not a NC team.
-
Our stud defense starting lineup is a fantastic contrast to our offensive-minded subs. We are able to stymie opponents early, go on runs when they’re vulnerable, and close down games effectively. This is a NC option.
-
Our team fails to mesh together nicely, and our offense is unable to find much of a rhythm. We revert to badball, and just hope Dotson and Doke can do enough to carry us. This is very unlikely to result in a NC.
-
-
CJ Moore had a great KU hoops mailbag for The Athletic this morning. He thinks Garrett starts over Moss, at least initially. He also thinks the identity of the team will be stifling defense, similar to the 11-12 bunch. Not sure if it’s breaking news, but Self is planning to play big 80% of the time, then use someone like Wilson as a small ball 4. Could also play Garrett at that spot since he’s 6’7 with the hair and is such a good defender. He also reported Ochai’s shot is much improved. They made a couple mechanical tweaks over the summer and his shot is more consistent now.
Also, check out how slim Udoka looks now. Dude is really gearing up to play extended minutes. He’s thin enough now to wear Mitch’s shorts. https://www.instagram.com/p/B0Y3IxAF373/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link
-
FarmerJayhawk said:
CJ Moore had a great KU hoops mailbag for The Athletic this morning. He thinks Garrett starts over Moss, at least initially. He also thinks the identity of the team will be stifling defense, similar to the 11-12 bunch. Not sure if it’s breaking news, but Self is planning to play big 80% of the time, then use someone like Wilson as a small ball 4. Could also play Garrett at that spot since he’s 6’7 with the hair and is such a good defender. He also reported Ochai’s shot is much improved. They made a couple mechanical tweaks over the summer and his shot is more consistent now.
Also, check out how slim Udoka looks now. Dude is really gearing up to play extended minutes. He’s thin enough now to wear Mitch’s shorts. https://www.instagram.com/p/B0Y3IxAF373/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link
I thought Doke looked super athletic in the scrimmages. I guess this would explain why.
-
@drgnslayr I don’t see any guys on the upcoming roster that scream problem player or locker room divider. BUT we will have to see with the Freshmen.
@HighEliteMajor I said this before but it boils down to do we need McBride’s shooting more than we need Harris’s all around PG game. This is assuming Harris can get himself eligible as a full qualifier. It’s going to be interesting to see what happens with the back-up PG spot.
@Kcmatt7 I worry about bad ball as well. As @Texas-Hawk-10 has fairly mentioned before this team looks more experienced than they are especially when it comes to actually playing for Self and playing together. Silvio is a JR that’s played 20 games total, Doke is a SR that’s logged under 1200 total minutes, Moss is a first year guy when it comes to Self etc…
-
@FarmerJayhawk Interesting nugget I would not have really known from that article…
“This is only the third time under Self the Jayhawks will head into the season with 13 eligible scholarship players.”
-
BShark said:
@FarmerJayhawk Interesting nugget I would not have really known from that article…
“This is only the third time under Self the Jayhawks will head into the season with 13 eligible scholarship players.”
I thought that was interesting too. Just looking across a lot of elite programs, it’s more rare than you’d think to have all 13 spots filled with guys who can play. Programs like KU, UNC, dook, and UK won’t take guys just to take them.
-
BShark said:
@Kcmatt7 I worry about bad ball as well. As @Texas-Hawk-10 has fairly mentioned before this team looks more experienced than they are especially when it comes to actually playing for Self and playing together. Silvio is a JR that’s played 20 games total, Doke is a SR that’s logged under 1200 total minutes, Moss is a first year guy when it comes to Self etc…
Really good point here.
I’m sure my worries will be quelled once the season starts and we beat the ever living shit out of Duke.
-
@Kcmatt7 Great stuff. Lots of good questions there. I am going to predict we will be a top 3 defensive team. A dominant defensive team. I think we’ll score enough to win, but maybe not enough to make us happy. I also think this will be the toughest team we’ve had in a long, long time. Mentally tough. Physically tough. I think our shooting will be good enough to win. I think it helps having Doke back to make easy buckets. National championship good? That’s really the big question, isn’t it? I think we’re all hedging from last year’s not so wonderful season. Understandable. I think we’re national championship good. Bill sure looks like a much better coach when they hit their 2nd year. Anytime Bill has experienced players, he does well. UNC won a title a few years ago barely shooting the 3- they simply killed everyone on the boards. So, it can be done.
-
I just want a team that’s fun to watch. Goes hard, doesn’t take off possessions, values d, attempts good passes, has a couple adequate gunners, doesn’t have off court drama, has good on court chemistry, has likeable personalities, wants to be there, and learns from their mistakes. If we have all that, both my enjoyment and team success should follow.
-
You mean… win a National Championship! Ha… pretty hard to fail with all the elements you want to see.
College basketball (as a hole) continues to decline. It isn’t the good ol’ days. There doesn’t exist many (if any) real teams with most of the pieces.
We take what we can get and we enjoy it the best we can, because this is where D1 has gone.
-
drgnslayr said:
College basketball (as a hole) continues to decline.
I don’t know, I would think women’s CBB is considerably better if you’re focused on the hole.
-
@HighEliteMajor dude…
-
-
Some things never change
-
HighEliteMajor said:
drgnslayr said:
College basketball (as a hole) continues to decline.
I don’t know, I would think women’s CBB is considerably better if you’re focused on the hole.
Ha! I chuckled.
-
There are several things I prefer in the women’s game… like… at least the women know how to seal the boards!
