Saving College Sports!
-
Iowa St just canceled their gymnastics team for an example of what your saying
-
Would not surprise me if Title IX is in the crosshairs.
-
Yea, not an easy topic. I don't know how to fix it, but it's broken.
I see @mayjay 's points, but i also think it's ridiculous to let students transfer to a different school every year like mercenaries to the highest bidder. It's college. I refuse to think it's a pro sport. It's not, and shouldn't be. There need to be rules. I'm not against players being paid, but i think insolvency is near when players are asking $4M+ a year. Again, it's college. That is not sustainable, or even possible for the majority of schools.
College sports could very well end up trying what the powerhouses of the soccer world tried, and failed to do: take the top 12 or so club teams and complete against each other only. Stupid. I guess they are already trying with conference realignment.
If we refuse to impose rules and regulations, just ditch the academic part and call it a day. There will be a salary cap, and players can use NIL as endorsement money. Some will get paid, some won't.
Next thing you're getting into forming unions, collective bargaining, and who knows what else. Nightmare. I repeat, it's college.
If you're fine with a player earning all he or she possibly can, i understand, but it could be the ruin of college sports.
-
@BeddieKU23 said in Saving College Sports!:
Iowa St just canceled their gymnastics team for an example of what your saying
That situation isn't in the same category to me because ISU is replacing gymnastics with another women's sport, rumored to be wrestling.
-
The solution to breaking the antitrust laws should not be disallowing protections to an entire class of people. It should be to find the same solution as in all pro sports: make the players employees. Then, yes, collective bargaining can lead to transfer and compensation rules and restrictions.
-
@rockchalkjayhawk I have yet to hear about a single athlete forcing any school to pay him or her a dollar. The schools seem to be willing to throw millions at the elites. Most don't get anything anywhere near mid-5 figures, let alone the 4 million dollars you may think is so common.
Like baseball owners, schools spend like crazy (and thus my post about coaches' salaries) and keep crying for someone to stop them from destroying their sports with the high NILs they offer. "Oh, no, please make new laws to protect me from myself!" "But you just negotiated billions in revenue from TV because people want to see your athletes play!" "Hell, yeah, we earned that. The kids didn't organize anything, did they?"
-
@mayjay said in Saving College Sports!:
The solution to breaking the antitrust laws should not be disallowing protections to an entire class of people. It should be to find the same solution as in all pro sports: make the players employees. Then, yes, collective bargaining can lead to transfer and compensation rules and restrictions.
See, there ya go. "pro" sports.
-
@mayjay said in Saving College Sports!:
@rockchalkjayhawk I have yet to hear about a single athlete forcing any school to pay him or her a dollar. The schools seem to be willing to throw millions at the elites. Most don't get that much.
Like baseball owners, schools spend like crazy (and thus my post about coaches' salaries) and keep crying for someone to stop them from destroying their sports with the high salaries they offer. "Oh, no, please make new laws to protect me from myself!"
Sure, let's talk about athletes "forcing" payment for a second.
Here's how it ends up...if the athletes at Kansas aren't paid going rates, or what top athletes get on the market, then Kansas Basketball is no longer gonna be Kansas basketball. How's that leave us fans? not that we're that important, but we are. Without fans, you really have no major college sports.
I can't speak to the laws as you can, so not sure how to argue your point.
-
@rockchalkjayhawk said in Saving College Sports!:
Here's how it ends up...if the athletes at Kansas aren't paid going rates, or what top athletes get on the market, then Kansas Basketball is no longer gonna be Kansas basketball. How's that leave us fans?
You want the best, you should pay the best. Why should my fandom require athletes to not be paid fairly? Isn't that what capitalism is all about?
And college basketball has paid elites for over 50 years, and football since the beginning of the 19th century, so the "pro" question was answered long ago.
-
@rockchalkjayhawk One last observation: A number of posters have spent a few years complaining about one-and-dones first, and more recently about upperclass transfers, as not adding to the KU legacy in their short time. A number have emphatically denounced those players as ones they will never consider "true" Jayhawks like the guys on the banners.
Todays comments about our outgoing seniors White and Council, who came for just 1 year, shows that players who give their hearts to KU can always find a way into the hearts of the faithful. Maybe fans can adjust to new realities. I mean, Dear Lord, the 3 point shot didn't destroy basketball, and the DH hasn't destroyed baseball. Go back far enough, virtually every change made in most sports has been decried as bad for the sport. But sports are more popular than ever.
-
@Jayhawk_69 said in Saving College Sports!:
Reagan once said that there is nothing scarier than someone from the government saying "I'm here to help." I don't think that is always true, but I think its true here.
Sadly it is a 100% true then and now. What government agency has anyone ever had to deal with is happy with their service? Remember when college was affordable before the government got into students loans or when housing was much more affordable before the government start subsidizing it? Like I tell everyone regardless of theres a D or R next to the name involved, the government is one big money milking party. We just ain’t invited, pay your taxes or go to jail.
