We've been here before, but after last year, it feels different.
-
Man, the Silvio lowball is strong with some here. Hope he proves them all wrong.
-
We haven’t seen Silvio play in what, 10 years? I’m hoping he’s added to his arsenal and gives Doke a run for his money in the post…and further out.
-
We all have seen over the years that Bill Self coaches teams tend to not start the year off fast. Hence you do not have to be a prophet to deduce this years teams will most likely follow the same trajectory. The experience actually, historically, has proven to be a huge difference. Again, anyone who has watched Bill Self coached teams knows that his best teams are ones that are older and more experienced. This is the case throughout college basketball.
I think on Silvio people tend to forget how good he was once he started figuring things out in the Big 12 tournament and on through March. And that was being just a couple months removed from high school right in the thick of conference play.
As others have said, Doke is the key and always has been since his freshman year with the infamous Oregon fiasco. I’ll always believe a healthy Doke gets us a final four in 2017.
What’s not to like about this year? Better shooting, quality depth, more experience and our most impactful players back from last year. Things could be a lot worse.
-
@DanR The potential is there, but there’s a lot of legitimate question marks about this team as well. How healthy will Doke, Agbaji, and Garrett be this year? Doke has missed most of two years and played injured his sophomore year.
Silvio DeSousa played less than 200 minutes his freshman year. How much has his offense progressed? Does he enough range to spread the floor any?
-
@Texas-Hawk-10 Silvio only needs to spread the floor about 8 feet to free up Doke. Looked capable in the scrimmages and he was a solid free throw shooter. I’d rather he put back misses rather than take three pointers. I know there’s always a chance some team makes 65% of their threes to beat us, but we’ve got a stable full of horses to outrun and dunk them to oblivion if Bill will let them. Or, grind them into the dirt.
-
@Texas-Hawk-10 Now, whether or not Doke breaks his third hand is still a concern.
-
I most anxious to see Silvio play!
-
Excellent post on Devil’s advocacy…
I know we can add up past PT minutes of Doke and Silvio… not a big number. But I do count the total time they’ve been Jayhawks. You are right to think the extra time doesn’t match real PT but to discount it is a mistake, too. And let’s not forget these kids age in human years. Without anything else, just getting a year older while they are sitting on the fence entering manhood is a big deal.
I think you will end up being pleasantly surprised about Moss. He’s a quality, skillful, smooth scorer. I’d take him any day over Vick. Vick ended his career living on the trey line. Very limited scorer, even though he started the year hot. Part of what made him such a variable was his scoring limitation. When he was guarded well on the perimeter, he was done. It won’t be that way with Moss. And he’s much better in the open floor, too. And comparing him to Q at the two… there is no comparison. Q was a disaster. Felt like we played most of the year 4 on 5. Hate to bash him… but the reality speaks for itself. Most of his game stats he should have had even playing blindfolded. He was consistently horrible all year, except a few games.
I look at Silvio, Mac and Doke as our three big men (thinking Mitch is a RS). I see it as 3 guys filling 2 spots. In our case the 4 and 5 are almost interchangeable, except Doke will need to be the 5 when in games.
I’ve heard nothing but great things about Silvio, and the players around him are biting at the bit to play with him in games. He’s like a man playing in a boy’s league.
We watched Mac settle in last year, including improving his rebounding substantially as he received move experience. He was just a nervous mass on the court when he started. The game began to slow down for him and I find it hard to believe he won’t start where he left off or even be better.
Doke on the FT line… now that is a total gamble and until I see it, I will not put my neck on the line on that one. My hope is that since we have a more threatening front line, we will draw more fouls in the post anyways and teams won’t have enough fouls to give to play “poke a Doke.” I see “poke a Doke” as a possibility only in the last minute or so. Still… time to coach like the NBA and push/pull guys in and out every possession at the end. Not sure why college coaches don’t think a bit more like NBA coaches. Still can’t get them to think about 2 for 1 possessions at the end, etc etc etc. Hedging defenses… ha… forgetaboutit!
I will put my neck on the line about expecting greatness from Devon. He will make everyone look a lot better because he will be learning the role of playmaker… and Devon should become unstoppable at accomplishing that!
You gave many examples of what can go wrong, and no doubt, we will have some of that happen. I’m not predicting a Calipari “perfect season.” Things do tend to go wrong at some point. I’m just excited for Jayhawk basketball and I’m liking this team immensely!
Rock Chalk!
-
@drgnslayr I have not seen Moss play, how does he compare to B-Rush?
-
Fightsongwriter said:
@drgnslayr I have not seen Moss play, how does he compare to B-Rush?
Nobody compares to B-Rush but B-Rush. He was one of a kind!!! I’m pretty biased though…regardless of what took place in the NBA…and speaking only of the time in a Jayhawk uniform…B-Rush is (in my opinion) the best player to suit up in the Bill Self era.
-
@Fightsongwriter Rush was a wing- Moss is a guard, so they don’t play the same position. That said, you would never mistake Moss for Rush. Rush was a cut above.
-
Interesting comparison. I’m thinking BRush had more size, and he used his size well. Both are very smooth scorers. Both have respectable handles. I think BRush may be a better defender. BRush battled injuries while at KU, which actually helped us to get him to stay for our championship season.
I’m hoping Moss may become more aggressive driving the ball over BRush, but I have nothing to base that on… hope.
Not sure if we will be able to make completely fair comparisons because the players around them are so different, and Self has added so many twists to his hi-lo, making it more a hybrid motion offense. That should favor Moss.
-
I actually have the opposite opinion than you. I expect this team to start very fast. Our early opponents will likely be overwhelmed by the Doke/Silvio combo inside. That will cover up some of the roster issues early in the year. Skipping the Duke game for a second (I’ll get back to them), the next four opponents are UNC-Greensboro, Monmouth, East Tennessee State and Chaminade. Then we get either a rebuilding UCLA team or an okay BYU squad. Then it’s Colorado, UMKC, UW-Milwaukee, Villanova and Stanford. Duke and Michigan State are the only two squads we really have to worry about there. Everyone else probably gets run off the floor by our size.
So back to Duke. I actually think we even handle Duke with our size. They are depending on two freshmen inside in Carey and Hurt that don’t have nearly the size and strength that Doke/Silvio have. If KU doesn’t get into foul trouble, we probably bully Duke off the floor, too. They have some really good players, but nothing like this year where they had so much individual talent that they could just blow a team off the court. Carey and Hurt will be up against grown men in the paint for the first time in their lives.
But come conference season, I think things could shift if we cannot find some consistent perimeter scoring. Not one of the players that we have on the roster has been a consistent perimeter scorer in their college careers. Maybe we can get by doing it by committee, but that’s hoping that one of the group has it going every night so teams cannot just pack the paint.
Once teams start adjusting to our size/strength advantage, we have to have a counter. That’s what I will be waiting to see. That’s what gives me pause.
-
@justanotherfan don’t forget about Dave!
-
I really want to see Silvio slap HURT around
, that’s his dumb headband he had on at one of the all star games. I’m pretty violent.
-
I could see Silvio giving Hurt a wedgie, and hanging him by the rim. But nothing beats what @FarmerJayhawk said in the Duke thread. I still say that it’s the perfect post.
-
rockchalkwyo said:
I could see Silvio giving Hurt a wedgie, and hanging him by the rim. But nothing beats what @FarmerJayhawk said in the Duke thread. I still say that it’s the perfect post.
Thank you for your kind words!
-
@FarmerJayhawk did you say kind words about duke?
-
Crimsonorblue22 said:
@FarmerJayhawk did you say kind words about duke?
If I did please call the nearest psychiatric hospital immediately.
-
I couldn’t find those words🥽
-
I keep saying this… and it deserves repeating. D1 this coming year is not prepared for Silvio! He has unbelievable strength and that was barely seen in the short time we had him on the court. He’s only gotten stronger (thanks Andrea!) and he has never played “open throttle basketball” in a Jayhawk uniform. What we really need to hear from is the rest of our players… their comments on Silvio’s strength. Duke bigs are going to look like boys… because they will be boys.
We all know that Doke is an original weapon that few teams can stand up to. Silvio will be another original weapon opposing players won’t be able to handle. Mac will be a huge help, too!
Let’s just hope our backcourt will come together nicely to make us a more complete team! I feel plenty of confidence, and it has been a long time since I’ve been this confident of our upcoming team during tomato season!
-
@justanotherfan Teams are going to pack the paint against KU because like last season, KU doesn’t have a lot of proven outside shooting. Moss is not a dead eye shooter so there will be nights where KU struggles from the outside and go through significant scoring droughts.
This team will be very similar offensively to last season before Doke’s injury and that team didn’t blow bad teams out of the water. They had a lot of scoring droughts and this team will as well.
-
@justanotherfan Moss 42%. Dotson 36%. Agbaji - 30%. I don’t see a problem with our perimeter. No way Agbaji shoots less than 35% from 3.
-
Moss is very streaky. He shot 42% from three, but he did that in a very streaky way. A sample:
Opens the season by going a combined 1-9 from the field in games against UMKC and Green Bay. Hits 7-12 threes in his next three games versus Oregon, UConn and Alabama State.
He followed that three game stretch up with a combined 1-8 from the field against Pitt and Wisconsin, then dropped an efficient 13 (4-8, 2-3) against Michigan State and a 20 piece (8-12, 4-5) in a rivalry game against Iowa State in back to back games.
A week after that Iowa State game he went 1-4 against Northern Iowa.
Or take this five game swing during conference play:
21 vs. Illinois on 7-12 shooting, including 5 threes
2 points against Michigan State on 1-7 shooting
23 at Minnesota on 8-14 shooting with 6 threes
Back to back goose eggs at Indiana and at home against Michigan on a combined 0-11 shooting.
Of course he would follow that up with 16 against Northwestern (6-12) and 17 against Rutgers (7-12).
My point is that Moss can score for sure. But he can also disappear.
-
@justanotherfan He was hurt the first 7 or 8 games of last year, and played sparingly, and his shooting suffered. No doubt he’s had his erratic moments, but he isn’t the only shooter we have.
-
@KUSTEVE yeah I don’t get what some are getting at - are they saying we couldn’t use a guy who shot 50% during conference play?? Even if he is streaky, I’d take it every day.
-
@HawkChamp I could be wrong on that. I’ll calculate it tonight, and give you an update. But as I recall, he shot much better after he started playing more minutes.
-
People keep saying how teams will pack it in the paint this year, which MAY happen but I think it’s pretty overblown. I don’t think there’s any way we are as bad of a shooting as last year. I don’t predict that will happen at all and that circumstance occurring is the only way teams will pack it in. I understand the concern but at this juncture in time it’s pretty unfounded.
-
@KUSTEVE None of those players are consistent shooters, they’re all streaky shooters like Lagerald Vick and Elijah Johnson. Moss is a player that can hit 5/6 in a game and then make 2 total 3’s during the next 3 games. That’s what his career has been and there’s no reason to think that’ll change this year. Agbaji is also a streaky shooter and I don’t expect him to be much better than 35% this season and that’s if he’s healthy all year. Dotson is the only one with potential, he last year he was too scared to pull the trigger on a lot of open 3’s. This is going to be a marginally better shooting team that last year.
I kept saying last summer this was going to be a team that struggled to score because of a lack of outside shooting. I got crapped on by a lot of people for that position and when the season started and KU was a bad shooting team that went through a lot of scoring droughts, a lot of people were shocked even though I’d been saying it for months that it would happen. This season isn’t going to be much different in that area.
There’s only going to be 2 new players in KU’s rotation this year, Moss and Silvio. This is strictly on court, but Moss isn’t an upgrade over Vick. He’s a push at best. Off the court, obviously there’s no comparison as Vick was probably the second biggest locker room cancer of a play Self has had after CJ Henry. Silvio is a down grade from Dedric on the offensive end of the floor. Silvio is a better rebounder than Dedric, but Dedric was far superior to Silvio in regards to scoring. Experience is the reason for that, but that’s reality. On defense, it remains to be seen what kind of development Silvio has made. Until proven otherwise, I would consider Silvio a down grade from Lawson.
As for replacing Grimes, it really comes down to whether or not Agbaji’s shin issues are chronic or not. I suspect it will still be an issue because Agbaji is still growing and maturing physically, he may end up similar to Wayne Selden and have to modify his game to account for leg issues.
With Marcus Garrett, a two post player system is the worst fit for his offensive game. His best work came right after the Doke injury and KU was running the 4 guard offense again and Garrett had room to drive. A two post player offense takes that element of Garrett away which is where his value on offense comes from if he’s not running point. I think Garrett ends up being the back up point once the rotation is finalized.
This is why I keep harping on Silvio having to have a consistent mid range or outside shot. If Silvio doesn’t have a consistent mid range or outside shot, the offense will take a step back this year because teams are going to pack the paint and force KU to beat them from deep just like last year. I fully expect teams to pack the paint, sit in the passing lanes, and take away the drive which hurts Dotson, Agbaji, and Garrett because driving is the biggest strength offensively for each of those players.
KU shot 35% from 3 last year, I genuinely don’t expect much improvement this year, if any. I’m calling it now, KU is going to play bully ball which is going to result in a lot of lower scoring games for KU this year.
-
@Texas-Hawk-10 no, at the end of the year Dedric was turning into a detriment on the offensive end of the floor, needed a ton of shots to get twenty points and was shooting a low percentage from three. Apparently you missed how good Silvio was in the March run in 2018 and how quickly he progressed after just joining the team. He was great against Konate in the championship game and held his own against Bagley and Carter and was key in the final four run. I’ll take the potential I saw in Silvio, his on court results and assumed improvements over what we saw out of Dedric at the end of the year.
-
@HawkChamp oh the slander! We needed Dedric, he was one of the only guys on the team last year that could create for himself and others. Remove him and all else stays the same and KU likely missed the tournament.
-
@BShark I know that, I’m mostly referring to how I would prefer a player like Silvio over Dedric. Even in his short time playing, Silvio made several plays, like the half court ally oop against Clemson or the alley oop to end the first half against West Virginia that Dedric could never make. Silvio has more potential, more strength, more athleticism and more efficiency, hence my reply to why Silvio is a better option imo.
-
@HawkChamp I didn’t miss it, I just don’t overhype his performance because of one good game. His limited minutes are getting overhyped the way Cole Aldrich as a freshmen frequently gets overhyped because of what Cole did against UNC. Silvio has a lot of potential, but until he shows he can do that consistently with extended minutes, it’s still just potential for Silvio. He won’t be what he was against WVU in the B12 tournament every game. That was an A+ game and you get A+ every game. Most games you get a C and Silvio’s C game this year is probably lower than Dedric’s C game was last season at least on offense.
Silvio played more than 15 minutes 3 times and only reached double digits in points two times. Most of his offense was limited to put backs off of misses or teams doubling Doke off of him.
The reason Dedric became less efficient as the year went on was because he was the sole focus of the offense after Doke’s injury. When you put have one guy who’s not afraid to take a shot, his numbers were going to get worse as the year went because he was wearing down because he didn’t have any help.
Don’t forget that in the NCAA Tournament, Silvio played 10, 4, 13, 26, and 10 minutes in those games. He didn’t exactly follow up that WVU game with more great games.
His NCAA performance is why I’m pumping the brakes on the Silvio hype train. Do not forget that in his 22 games, Silvio played a grand total of 175 minutes.
-
@Texas-Hawk-10 I know all that, I watched every game and have watched replays. Similarly, you should not forget that he was what, two months removed from high school? To do what he did in that short amount of time is a testament to his potential and learning capability.
My position remains the same - we will be a better team at the end of the year with a long, strong and athletic player like Silvio over a player like Dedric. Don’t get me wrong, I like Dedric as a player but he doesn’t raise the ceiling of a team to the extent that Silvio does.
-
@HawkChamp Your key term is potential. I will not argue about the higher ceiling because Silvio absolutely has the higher ceiling. KU is not getting a 4th year Silvio with a refined game. They’re getting a Silvio with less than 200 of game time that’s likely still very raw offensively. That consistency is why I’d rather take a 4th year Dedric over the version of Silvio we’ll get this year that will likely still struggle with consistency.
-
@Texas-Hawk-10 that May happen, it may not. Who knows how “refined” his game is. All I care about is progression through the year and it doesn’t sound illogical to assume Silvio will do just that. He has final four experience and a year to learn about Selfs system and practice with the team. I mean, it’s not like he was chilling on the sidelines and doing nothing but eat Snickers and listen to Kanye the whole time. Sure, he needs more game experience but he’ll get plenty of that during the season and be primed to go in March.
-
@HawkChamp The E8 win against Duke in that run, Silvio played 26 minutes and scored 4 points. That’s why he won’t be Dedric Lawson. He will develop, but that takes time and there is no substitute for that. Lawson got to where he was because of on court experience. Silvio DeSousa lacks that.
Lawson was entering his junior season just like Silvio will be this year. Silvio has played 175 minutes of college basketball entering his junior season. Dedric Lawson had played 2,166 minutes of college basketball entering his junior season.
As far as practicing, yeah Silvio practiced last season, but he was scout team all year. He wasn’t running the KU offense at all in practice, he was running the other team’s offense. This matters as well because he doesn’t have the reps in the Self offense.
I think you’re getting way ahead of yourself about what Silvio will be this year because of a few good moments sprinkled in with a lot more bad moments.
-
@HawkChamp Ok, I was wrong. Moss shot 33 of 67 from 3 in B10 play, which is only 49%…not 50%.
-
https://twitter.com/silviodesousa5/status/1152338079484710913?s=21
On a side not Silvio looks to be in shape
-
Just getting ready to post that! So dang happy for him!
-
Woodrow said:
https://twitter.com/silviodesousa5/status/1152338079484710913?s=21
On a side not Silvio looks to be in shape
Mercy - - that’s like a brick shithouse without a brick missing
-
@Texas-Hawk-10 And I think you’re ignoring important facts about when Silvio played.
First, with Svi, Devonte, Malik and Vick being the terrific perimeter players and shooters they were, the offense was never going to go through a freshman Silvio, nor should it have.
Secondly, you discuss point numbers yet conveniently leave out his rebounding numbers and overall low post presence, which is what we were desperately needing at the time. In the Big 12 tournament, here are his numbers -
OSU - 6 points, 8 rebounds
KSU - 8 points, 11 rebounds
WVU - 16 points, 10 rebounds
I’ll give it to you that he didn’t do much against Penn or Seton Hall, but here are his numbers against Clemson and Duke -
Clemson - 9 points, 6 rebounds
Duke - 4 points, 10 rebounds
To me, those are all really solid numbers and absolutely took care of the need. If he posted numbers like that in that short amount of time, I’m confident that he has potential to do more. I’m not sure why this is something that would even be brought up for debate by anyone who paid attention to the games at the time.
Thirdly, you say that there were plenty of bad moments - uh, duh, he was two months removed from high school and joined during conference season! Yeah, he was on a steep learning curve that was a very unique situation and yet he improved a lot and played great for us on the way to the Big 12 tournament championship and a final four run.
Given on court time, Silvio WILL get there and impact the team in more diverse ways than Dedric ever did. Remember, scoring is important but there is more to it than that. There is a reason dragonslayr has been talking a lot about the physicality of our frontcourt with Dok, Dave and Silvio. Did we have that last year with no Dok and Silvio? Absolutely not. It was soft as a kitten’s fur in that department, which is part of what Dedric does not contribute. I know Silvio will likely not score as many points as Dedric per game, but it’s the other facets of his game that this year’s team will reap the benefits of.
-
@Texas-Hawk-10 I think Silvio gets 20 minutes a game, max…simply because of what silvio lacks- a mid-range game. They interviewed Coach Self a few weeks ago, and asked him who had made the biggest improvements of anyone on the team this summer, and he said…hands down it was Dave. He said there is absolutely no question that Dave was our best big shooter by far. Dave could make the Silvio worry moot. And I think he will. Now, you’ll probably fire back that Dave is not all that and a bag of chips, but you won’t convince me otherwise. In fact, I think you’re going to be surprised how good Silvio looks, too.
You compared Moss to Vick, and then missed the boat on the most important difference between Vick and Moss: Moss ain’t gonna quit on the team. Advantage Moss.
Saying 3 point shooters are streaky is like saying that water is wet. We could say that about Devonte, Malik, and Svi. One would have a good game while the rest couldn’t hit the broad side of a barn that night. Very few times did all three just murder it in a game. My point is that we have guys that can make 3s. Moss will never be as open as he is in our offense. In the Iowa offense, he had to create every shot. He’s going to die and go to heaven being fed the ball being completely wide open. Maybe Ochai is injury prone, and never gets there. But, maybe he manages better this year with full awareness of the symptoms, and knows when to back off better than he did the first time it happened. Maybe he manages 25-30 minutes. I’m betting 35% or better from 3 because he can flat shoot. I like JW too. McBride…Braun are no slouches…and one of these days, Marcus is going to put it together. Then you add the best basketball coach in college, and you have a formula for a deep run.
-
@KUSTEVE Dave isn’t going to be playing alongside Doke much, if at all, he’s going to be the back up for Doke which means him and Silvio likely play together quite a bit as well. I do think the spacing will be better with Dave and Silvio together because of Dave’s mid range ability. My big concern with Dave is his rebounding ability because it was awful last year. That has to get better for him to see a significant uptick in his minutes.
You also need to go back and re-read my Vick/Moss comparison because I specifically said on the court, I did not mention off the court because I’ve already called Vick the second biggest cancer KU has had under Self. I wasn’t a big fan of bringing Vick back last year because of his baggage.
Saying a 3 point shooter streaky is like saying water is wet is not a good analogy. There is a difference in the type of outside shooter players like Vick and Moss are compared to what Svi, Graham, and Mason were as shooters. A bit streak for a streaky shooter may be something like hitting 60 or 70% over a 2-3 game stretch like we saw with Vick early last season. A cold streak for a streaky shooter is going to be hitting about 20% over a several game stretch.
Consistent shooters like Svi, Graham, and Mason don’t tend to spike as much either way during hot or cold stretches. That’s the difference between a streaky shooter and a consistent shooter.
Wilson, McBride, and Braun can shoot, but they won’t be factors in the rotation so they don’t add much this year. In a couple of seasons, those guys will probably challenge the '17 and '18 teams for made 3’s, but they aren’t ready yet.
As for Garrett he’s never going to be a good shooter. Just look as his FT% and tell me why we should expect him to ever find a consistent shot. His ceiling is about 33% as a deep shooter. Garrett is a slasher, not a shooter.
-
@Texas-Hawk-10 Hope your wrong but that’s a strong take. I have the same concerns.
-
Texas Hawk 10 said:
@KUSTEVE Dave isn’t going to be playing alongside Doke much, if at all, he’s going to be the back up for Doke which means him and Silvio likely play together quite a bit as well. I do think the spacing will be better with Dave and Silvio together because of Dave’s mid range ability. My big concern with Dave is his rebounding ability because it was awful last year. That has to get better for him to see a significant uptick in his minutes.
You also need to go back and re-read my Vick/Moss comparison because I specifically said on the court, I did not mention off the court because I’ve already called Vick the second biggest cancer KU has had under Self. I wasn’t a big fan of bringing Vick back last year because of his baggage.
Saying a 3 point shooter streaky is like saying water is wet is not a good analogy. There is a difference in the type of outside shooter players like Vick and Moss are compared to what Svi, Graham, and Mason were as shooters. A bit streak for a streaky shooter may be something like hitting 60 or 70% over a 2-3 game stretch like we saw with Vick early last season. A cold streak for a streaky shooter is going to be hitting about 20% over a several game stretch.
Consistent shooters like Svi, Graham, and Mason don’t tend to spike as much either way during hot or cold stretches. That’s the difference between a streaky shooter and a consistent shooter.
Wilson, McBride, and Braun can shoot, but they won’t be factors in the rotation so they don’t add much this year. In a couple of seasons, those guys will probably challenge the '17 and '18 teams for made 3’s, but they aren’t ready yet.
As for Garrett he’s never going to be a good shooter. Just look as his FT% and tell me why we should expect him to ever find a consistent shot. His ceiling is about 33% as a deep shooter. Garrett is a slasher, not a shooter.
I think your just flat grossly mis stating fact if you think Wilson won’t be a factor - your WAY under estimating Wilson
-
@jayballer73 Where are his minutes going to come from? This is the type of team where Self typically has a very short leash with freshmen.
Just about every scouting report on Wilson talks about him being a better scorer than shooter at this point so I wouldn’t expect him to light world in fire with his shooting right away. He was also described as a good athlete which means he’s a step slow compared to the top recruits where you would see the term great or elite athlete.
There’s a reason he was ranked 50ish in a weak recruiting class. He’s nowhere near a polished product and he’s going to need time to get to where he can be which I think is somewhere between Marcus Morris and Perry Ellis. Those players needed time as well to become what they became at KU.
Best case for Jalen Wilson this year is the 4th big man which historically means 7-8 mpg because he isn’t jumping Doke, Silvio, or Dave in the rotation barring injury. If Lightfoot doesn’t redshirt, then Wilson is a non factor this year in the rotation and would only see spot minutes in mop up time because he wouldn’t be ahead of Lightfoot either.
-
@jayballer73 We know historically that Self prefers a 7 or 8 man rotation once he trims the rotation for B12 play. Injuries can mess that rotation up obviously, but this is assuming no injuries.
KU has a full 13 man roster of scholarship players so that means 5 or 6 scholarship players will not be in that rotation. We also know redshsirting is a possibility, but we won’t know who actually does or doesn’t until much later so I’m ignoring that right now. Just so everyone is clear, the 3 redshirt possibilities this season would be Lightfoot, Braun, and Harris.
I think only of the starting spots are guaranteed at this point and that’s Dotson and Doke. The other two perimeter spots will be between Agbaji, Garrett, and Moss and the other post spot will be between Silvio and McCormack.
I think the best line up for KU would be Dotson, Moss, Agbaji, Silvio, and Doke. I say this because Marcus Garrett can play 1-4 so he can sub for anyone if KU wanted to go 4 guards. I would have Dave off the bench because he can sub for either post position.
That’s 7 players right there, that means there’s maybe 1 more rotation spot available. Depending on how Self uses Garrett, that 8th rotation spot is likely the back up PG spot. That’s a battle between McBride and Harris for that role.
-
@KUSTEVE I agree, and people are saying that defenses are going to pack it in. Pack it in with who and against whom? Our frontcourt is made of men and deep, and we will have shooters waiting outside.
-
@Texas-Hawk-10 Dave has a ways to go as a big. But, when I hear Coach Self raving about him the way he did this summer, it tells me something is happening enough for the coach to say “hands down” the most growth in the summer. Maybe some shooting range, maybe some improved ball skills, maybe some better rebounding. These players aren’t stationary bicycles- they grow…they improve.
I think you’ve been crooning over Dedric’s 19ppg so much, you aren’t realizing that his points will be replaced. They are always replaced. Might not be one guy picking up the slack, but I guarantee you Bill’s offense will always score what they normally score. In fact, because we have to make up for one big scoring guy, that makes our offense more diverse, and harder to defend. After Perry graduated, we all said where are the points going to come from now that Perry is gone, and we managed. We wonder every year where the points are going to come from ( unless we have returning top scorers), and every year, Bill manages to figure it out. It is why he is in the Hall of Fame.
Maybe it’s a hodgepodge of 3 point shooters that carry us when we need it. Maybe it’s Moss one night, Dotson the next time, and Agbaji the next. Maybe our frontline allows to us play more aggressively, and we pick up some cheapies off our defense. Cheapies we weren’t getting last year because our defense sucked so badly. Maybe the improved rebounding allows us to have more possessions than last year, and so the “live and die by the 3 when they pack in the lane and we shoot badly” meme doesn’t hold as much water. Maybe the question isn’t “how is KU going to score” as relevant as “how are we going to score on KU”??? . Remember, there’s more than one way to skin a wildcat.
