Composite 3 Replaces Composite 5: Improved Scoring, Less Rebounding, Similar Blocks, More TOs, More Fouls
-
@jaybate-1.0 all sounds good, BUT Holy Cross, didn’t give us the running game. What I saw in my limited viewing was HC sending zero people to the Offensive boards and all Five running back on D after one shot for the main part.
KU created pace with a combination of better athletes, variety of presses applied intermittently, and just playing fast - take open shots.
This game appears to have given our raw or underutilized big talent some time to develop. Iron out their wrinkles of their games. Plenty to coach them on SO they actually improve. Coaching game situation and result has to be more effective than practice situation. In ‘kids’ minds, a greater relationship of cause and effect in situations they see as real versus “roll eyes, there goes dad being dad again”.
-
@jaybate-1.0 and here I thought the C3 was the composite of Selden, Svi and Greene at the 3.
-
@JRyman I thought that after glancing at the headline too!
-
I’m not saying KU should become the old Billy Tubbs OU teams. However for this year the talent and what the Kids are good at are shooting and running. So why not play to their strengths?
I have to disagree that this Year’s KU team can play the High/low and grind wins out. As in the two games that I seen where coach brought the game plan to a stop and went inside exclusively. KU lost one and damn near lost the other one. And not even talk about what happened last year.
@jaybate-1.0 I understand where you’re coming from. You’re a bit like coach. In then that you like a grind game. You want to see a border line fist fight in the paint. You want the game in the 60’s.
Just remember there are many ways to play the game. This KU team plays better fast, This team plays better when they take the low % midrange jump shot. The team plays better when they can fire away from 3 land.
Next years team maybe different and require a different approach. Yet for now this team is it’s best when they run.
And I say lets let them run.
-
Re: your observation that HC didn’t try to rebound…
Well, if you say so. That’s not what I saw the first half, and the FGA for KU were 27 first half, and 27 the second half, suggests KU’s tempo didn’t change much. To reiterate, I didn’t see what you saw the first half, and I didn’t see much of the second half. So: I have tried to rethink the game recognizing what you testify to. After trying to integrate your observation, I have come out with this altered interpretation.
What I saw the first half was Holy Cross running the Princeton, shooting the trey very well at 54%, and shooting decently from the field overall at 48%, but HC was making too many TOs because of KU’s defensive pressure, while KU was shooting 80% from trey. The second half Princeton went ice cold and KU stayed pretty warm.
The game was decisively determined by hot shooting and KU’s defense, not by KU forcing tempo, if it did, which its constant FGA numbers both halves don’t suggest.
Holy Cross wasn’t as good as KU in any phase of the game, and shot horribly the second half.
KU shot the lights out over all.
One might ask how KU, on a once every few seasons shooting night,maybe even once every 5 years, did not win by more than 92-59 after shooting 60% from trey, 63% overall, and 100% from the FT line?
The answer?
KU turned it over 15 times; had it stripped from them 8 times; and was +5 on fouling against a much slower team, and with a home whistle on top of everything.
Revised bottom line?
Get ready for this, for I likely could only say this about any but a Self team.
Note: Self teams are prone to the strangest quantitative anomalies of any teams that I have ever watched.
In a 92-59 blow out, KU actually didn’t play very good basketball.
They just shot the lights out.
If KU really did force the tempo as you say they did, they discovered that they don’t play too well at that tempo, and perhaps ought to either get better at that tempo, or slow it down. Capice?
Take away KU’s scalding hot shooting, and a team playing the kind of ball KU played would be ripe for an upset by a Princeton team, or any other kind of team.
Very, very, VERY strange game to analyse
Thanks for making me rethink it.
Rock Chalk!
-
Re: rebounding- Holy Cross head coach said in his post game that he told his team to not even pursue offensive rebounds…he wanted all 5 falling back immediately to stop transition points.
“I actually told the team, ‘Do not go near an offensive rebound,’” Carmody said. “‘A shot goes up, just get back.’ And they still beat us down the court a lot.”
-
@SoftballDad2011 I think I said that during game chat.
-
Get used to KU shooting lights out. As they are indeed a great shooting team.
-
You took the kool aid.
It takes about 12 more hours and another game for it to wear off.
Now, I am going to talk you down off the ledge.
Repeat after me: “Even though I can see sounds and hear colors, no team in the history of basketball has averaged 50-60% from trey. God is my co-pilot, not the kool aid.”
-
Ok, “Even though I can see sounds and hears colors, no team in the history of basketball has averaged 50-60% from trey. God is my co-pilot, not kool aid.”
Um, @jaybate-1.0 “God just told me all things are possible with him.”
Is it really that impossible to think that a team can shoot 50-60% trey? I’m not saying KU will but geez you act like the sky is falling because KU is shooting the ball so well. Like somehow the bottom is going to fall out or something. Problem is @jaybate-1.0 KU can’t play the high/low as they don’t a big that can score with his back to the basket. I don’t know maybe Diallo in time can learn but he’s already lost so much time because of the stupid NCAA suspension.
You see two NBA teams shooting over 40%, and so many more are close.
This one should open you’re eyes? As the amount of kids that are shooting over 40% from three land.
So you see KU shooting 50% from trey land isn’t as farfetched as one might thing. An incredible feat yes but not impossible.
-
@DoubleDD Law of averages says the bottom will drop out at some point. KU is due for a shooting slump. I’d rather it start sooner than later. The sky is not falling and this is a good team, but the bottom is about to drop out on this shooting. Big 12 teams will not give up as many open threes. Players of higher caliber than HC’s team will close out better, force the spot up shooters off their spots, and stick to scouting reports on the trey gunners.
Two not so bold predictions:
- Greene will not shoot 89% from three for the year.
- Selden will not shoot 60% from three for the year.
This is the basis of the fools gold comment that gets overlooked. Self in no way was trying to discount the great shooting of his players. He just didn’t want them to get comfortable shooting so well. He wanted them prepared for when eventually they would miss shots.
Self does not hate made shots. He is in a constant struggle to win over the minds of young men and convince them that defense isn’t as susceptible to the nasty law of averages as shooting from 21 feet away.
Ask almost any coach and they will tell you players tend to relax on defense after making a few shots in a row. It is only natural to feel good about yourself and lose a little of the defensive edge.
-
I agree that the %'s will come back down to earth at some point but this team could still be one of the top 10 3pt shooting teams in the country if the numbers drop.
You have 4 guys (Selden, Mason, Graham, & Greene) who are all very capable of shooting at least 40% from 3 this year. Selden & Greene could flirt close to 50% the way they are shooting.
A major difference so far with this team is how they share the ball to get open looks. If they continue to share the ball with success I’m imagining we will find ways to get open shots for our shooters.
-
@benshawks08 especially when they are putting 3 fingers to their head while their man is headed to the goal. Don’t think that will happen again!
-
@DoubleDD said:
Is it really that impossible to think that a team can shoot 50-60% trey?
Season average? Yes.
-
@Crimsonorblue22 Unfortunately I think it will happen again! Either that or a guy takes himself completely out of the play after assuming the shot will go in while it’s in the air (see Devonte last year, The Warriors this year). Fun when it works. STUPID when it doesn’t!
-
@BeddieKU23 You said “You have 4 guys (Selden, Mason, Graham, & Greene) who are all very capable of shooting at least 40% from 3 this year. Selden & Greene could flirt close to 50% the way they are shooting.”
Very true. Ellis also shot 40% last season.
We have guy on staff that shot 50% from three his senior season, Aaron Miles.
But I definitely think 45% is doable for both Selden and Greene. Selden’s shot looks terrific. He is shooting himself into the first round.
Living by the three is less risky than living by the post feed with this team. It was the same last season.
What we have different this season that might satisfy coach Self is creating shots in the paint by playing fast (vs. the “bad ball” perpetual weave, drive it 80% of the time).
Living by the three and playing fast, getting easy baskets that way might just do it offensively as far as our coach is concerned.
-
@HighEliteMajor I thought about you watching the HC game when we started the weave. Then we used it to get a wide open three! I saw that a couple of times that game. Don’t hate the weave when it’s getting the shots you want!
-
@benshawks08 Oh, I love the weave. Don’t get me wrong. It was just at the end of last season we were using to way, way too much – perpetually. It seemed like our base offense sometimes.
-
It has been done before…
THREE-POINT FIELD-GOAL PERCENTAGE
(Min. 100 made) 50.8%—Indiana, 1987 (130 of 256)
(Min. 150 made) 50.0%—Mississippi Val., 1987 (161 of 322)
(Min. 200 made) 49.2%—Princeton, 1988 (211 of 429)
-
I guess my logic is that on most occasions a team on average has 1 maybe 2 players that can really shoot a 3 for a high average.
Yet as @BeddieKU23 pointed out we have 4 in Mason, Selden, Graham, and Greene. That doesn’t include SVI or Perry.
Logic being sure a shooter can go cold but pure numbers meaning shooters in this case should overcome when a Selden isn’t quite feeling it. What I also like is that this KU team just doesn’t chuck 3’s to shoot 3’s. The majority of 3’s taking by KU are indeed in the flow of the game and good shots.
However as @HighEliteMajor pointed out it’s not just about just shooting the three, yet the pace with which KU plays is the determining factor. KU pushing the ball has shown they are tough to beat, because even when the shots aren’t falling they can weather the storm until they do. I’m also a firm believer that our bigs play better and have better games when KU pushes the pace. For some reason when coach slows the game down and wants to go inside KU struggles.
The three is no gimmick offense weapon. Used properly and there is no defense.
-
I would also like to add when KU plays that talented team that decides to focus on shutting down the 3 ball? Well then coach will be able to run is High/low to perfection. As the opposing team will have to put so much effort in stopping the 3, thereby leaving the paint open for the C5 to feast.
-
The three is no gimmick offense weapon. Used properly and there is no defense.
However, when the shots are not falling you have to do something else or else you are doomed. Look at UK at UCLA, the outside shot was not working and they dug themselves an early grave…or ISU against Iowa…if you don’t count Thomas Matt…Thomas who? who went 6-9 from 3, the rest of the team shot 3-21 from the 3. In the second half the team shot 4-17 from 3 and got much better result going inside…and ISU is a good 3 point shooting team.
-
Yea but UK doesn’t have the shooters KU does. Also as for the Clones they pushed the pace of the game. This is what I’ve been saying from the beginning. Sure there will be nights when the shots won’t fall, but you know what? This current KU team looks just as bad trying to pound the ball inside. Just look at last year. Need I say more?
Yet when KU gets out and run they are very hard to beat. Just look at the WUG’s. There were nights were KU wasn’t hitting the shots but it was them pushing the pace that won the WUG’s.
It wasn’t pounding the ball inside.
-
@jaybate-1.0 I saw none of the first half.
-
Thanks for getting us those numbers.
I stand corrected.
50.8% for a right tail tops is something I can live with.
It’s rare, but possible.
Other right tail highs nesting near it suggest 52-60% are beyond probable hope, unless something has changed that is not yet apparent.
I do expect we should see that right tail high edge up some, if teams stack up with more Trey ballers.
But 55-60 would require quite a sea change, or one huge rare anomaly.
-
Interesting. What changed after 1988 to stop those peaks?
-
Th original 3-point line was introduced in the 1986-1987 season at 19’-9" and in 207 it was extended to 20’-9".
