💀💀 Other Games 💀💀
    KU Buckets
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Season in review: the players

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved KU Basketball / Other NCAAM
    12 Posts 7 Posters 251 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • rockchalkjayhawkR Online
      rockchalkjayhawk
      last edited by

      Agreed. I just thought he was wimpy going to the rim. too many wild, gangly layup attempts.

      C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C Online
        crimsonblu22 @rockchalkjayhawk
        last edited by

        @rockchalkjayhawk had a sweet one today.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
        • approxinfinityA Offline
          approxinfinity
          last edited by approxinfinity

          My issues arent with the players. The things I want to grade here are their usage, their growth, their pay. It feels very difficult to judge them as individual contributors in a meaningful way when their capacities are very much bounded by forces external to them.

          That being said I would probably give each of them an extra point over your ratings if judging how they handled their season.

          rockchalkjayhawkR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • rockchalkjayhawkR Online
            rockchalkjayhawk @approxinfinity
            last edited by

            @approxinfinity said in Season in review: the players:

            My issues arent with the players. The things I want to grade here are their usage, their growth, their pay. It feels very difficult to judge them as individual contributors in a meaningful way when their capacities are very much bounded by forces external to them.

            That being said I would probably give each of them an extra point over your ratings if judging how they handled their season.

            Fair enough. Basically I’m simply offering a way to bitch about players to soothe our post season blues. Since these players are pros now, seems fair.

            I think the “growth” category is the big issue you’re personally having with Self. Most saw no growth, and actually performed worse as the season progressed. Flory is better than last year, but we can see his flaws and kryptonite.

            Usage: another Self issue.

            BigBadB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • BigBadB Offline
              BigBad @rockchalkjayhawk
              last edited by BigBad

              @rockchalkjayhawk said in Season in review: the players:

              Fair enough. Basically I’m simply offering a way to bitch about players to soothe our post season blues. Since these players are pros now, seems fair.

              Does being paid somehow negate being young and dumb? Does it negate playing only one season under Coach Self, who always takes 2 years minimum to get the best out of guys?

              rockchalkjayhawkR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
              • rockchalkjayhawkR Online
                rockchalkjayhawk @BigBad
                last edited by

                @BigBad said in Season in review: the players:

                @rockchalkjayhawk said in Season in review: the players:

                Fair enough. Basically I’m simply offering a way to bitch about players to soothe our post season blues. Since these players are pros now, seems fair.

                Does being paid somehow negate being young and dumb? Does it negate playing only one season under Coach Self, who always takes 2 years minimum to get the best out of guys?

                I don’t understand what you’re asking.

                This post is a simple way to discuss player performance. No nuance involved.

                approxinfinityA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • approxinfinityA Offline
                  approxinfinity @rockchalkjayhawk
                  last edited by approxinfinity

                  @rockchalkjayhawk sorry, not in any way trying to invalidate your post. Just where my thoughts are. yours are perfectly valid and I appreciate the angle. Mostly I'm just bummed out right now.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J Offline
                    JoJoAndMe
                    last edited by

                    Yesterday showed the lack of team chemistry development. (Admittedly, DP's health inconsistency had a lot to do with it.) Even after a full season, however, when we needed to score, Melvin and Tre DEFERRED to DP, and DP did nothing to make them more effective participants in the offense. Could be lack of coaching OR, maybe, we were just really unlucky that we had a highly touted freshman that suffered full body cramps.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • bskeetB Offline
                      bskeet
                      last edited by bskeet

                      This team was a top 8 team on paper and in my heart at the start of the season (and at various times in the season).

                      But from January to present, looking objectively, they ware mostly between top 16-25. Going into the tourney, my head said that the round of 32 was the threshold for the team. If we get to S16, there should be no disappointment... But losing at the round of 32 was completely possible. And the way we lost — on a shot at the buzzer — kind of shows how close we were. Like, #17. That sucks, but that's where we landed.

                      It's kind of fitting when you look back on the record -- losing to West Virginia, losing at home to Cincinnati when it really mattered... Yet beating Iowa State, Houston and Arizona.. Not to mention Tennessee who is in the S16. So, we could win or we could lose...

                      If the game goes to OT, I like our chances, but it didn't.

                      Again, number 17, in a game where number 16 is still playing, and the season is over for #17.

                      Rock Chalk!

                      B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
                      • B Offline
                        benshawks08 @bskeet
                        last edited by

                        @bskeet I definitely agree with this idea. I'd even say we could be 16 or 15. We are better than Texas. We are probably better than Iowa. Obviously, they are still playing and we aren't. They beat good teams when it mattered and we didn't. This was always a flawed team (every team is tbh). But they were fun. I believe they played hard, cared about each other, and most importantly, didn't give up at the end. This round of 32 loss doesn't feel great. The way it ended makes it hurt more than the last two in my opinion. But that says more about the positives of this team than the negatives to me. I WANTED to watch this team play more games. I was happy the two before were done... I love these players. They gave me an entertaining season that ended in heartbreak. If it doesn't end in a celebration I'd rather it end in heartbreak anyway.

                        Privilege isn't nonsense.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • First post
                          Last post