Self Fullfilling Prophecy
-
I agree with most of HEM’s points. I also think the second half fizzle was due to playing through Perry Ellis when he was clearly injured and ineffective. I think we would have been better off with Mickelson and Lucas.
-
Adding to the discussion, it is common for folks to reference too much reliance on the outside shot as a reason to support Self one track approach. But did you see Self’s quote from after the ISU game?
“We had no inside game at all. They just packed it in and dared us to make plays and we couldn’t make them.”
Then look at ISU’s offense. Folks claim they rely on three pointers. But look at the box score. ISU went 2-16 from three. How does a team that relies so much on threes actually win when they’re not hitting threes?
-
“How does a team that relies so much on threes actually win when they’re not hitting threes?”
They won because they wanted it more than us.
-
@drgnslayr absolutely correct
-
@HighEliteMajor Umm KU did hit a cold steak. It’s no myth its the past several games.
I like to see KU shooting threes it keeps the D honest. I just think a strong inside game is a way to win more consistently. Unfortunately this team is weak inside, Kelly plays like a freshman and can’t slash consistently, Perry is a 3/4 and needs a true 5 to play next to. Selden is not a dead eye 2, nor is he a great ball-handler. Frank has been a pleasant surprise, but not mistake free. Graham will be good, but is inconsistent. Svi plays like a really talented 17 year old.
So since KU does nothing great, it must do everyhing well. They must not just rely on one dimention of the game. They have been coached that when the three isn’t falling to do something different. They have been coached to look for a higher percentage shot than a quick three early in the offense. The three will be open more often than any other shot, because it’s the easiest to miss (fools gold-sure looks good).
I wish ISU would have kept jacking quick threes in the second half like they did in the first.
-
@HighEliteMajor said:
@dylans Here’s the thing … you can have both. Have you watched Gonzaga play? Duke? Wichita St.? You obviously saw ISU. And you’ve seen OU. Just examples. Not perfect teams. Just examples.
No, I have a job, kids, wife and in general a life. I don’t know what your schedule is like, but I’m busy. I watch KU basketball and sports center. When I was younger and had more free time on my hands I watched plenty of NCAA basketball. I may watch a handful of tourney games that KU’s not in, but that’s it.
I am a KU fan period. I don’t give a … about any other team.
-
@dylans That’s fine, and I respect that. Seeing other teams play can just affect one’s perspective when assessing the propriety of Self’s offensive approach. Threes are much, much more than just keeping the “D honest.”
You say that three point shots are the easiest to miss - would it surprise you to know that our three point percentage, even with the 9 game downturn, is still higher than our two point jump shot percentage?
-
@HighEliteMajor With respect to Brannen Greene being psyched out. What a crock! You must think that BG is the dumbest player on the face of the earth. Unless he is the dumbest player he knows that he is on the floor for one reason only and that is to shoot threes. He sees the film and must know that his defense needs a lot of work. He cannot dribble the ball more than 5 times with a defender within 5 feet without coughing it up. His passing leaves as much to be desired as that of anyone else on the team. Let’s give him a little credit for improving the rebounding.
And yet after all of this he was on the floor yesterday during the most critical part of the game. Why was he there? Obviously to shoot threes and he did. Making one that counted for something. Who put him on the floor? Since neither you nor KUinLA are the coaches I guess it was probably Bill Self. Obviously he must have felt terrible, being as stupid as you assume that he is, thinking that the coach has no confidence in his abilities.
Self could have had KO or Svi shooting to try and come back but he did not. As offensively challenged as a bag a hammers he played someone that he had no confidence in and who he had insulted and damaged his confidence with his “fools gold” comment. Leave the dime store psychology to Dr. Phil.
-
I think you all know where I stand on this issue. I just don’t see how you don’t play to your strength. I could and would agree with a HC saying hey we got the three thing down lets work on our inside game. Yet that’s not how it went down. HCBS basically came out and showed his disdain for the three point shot. He termed it Fools Gold.
Which I’m fine with HCBS’s lets pound the ball inside at all costs. Hey he’s won a lot of games doing it. However if that’s the approach on offense, then don’t recruit a Conner, or Greene type of kid. One you’re wasting that kids ability and two your driving the fans nuts.
I think HCBS is a fine coach one of the best, but I don’t think he’s adapting to the OAD very well. Think of this years team and last years team. Really KU’s experience with the OAD era. Last year when Embiid went down. HCBS had no answer. Even in his own words he said I made his biggest mistake of my coaching career last year. He was waiting for Embiid to come back. Now look at this year. Some of you may disagree with me but every time I a see Lucas on the floor I think gosh that is a prototypical HCBS big man. Why this kid had to wait this long to start is beyond me.
HCBS is a system coach and his system works best when he has 3 to 4 year players. He is old school in his thinking has he has one way of doing things. He doesn’t vary from the system much, and he never just completely abandons it. So I say a lot of KU problems are HCBS recruiting OAD’s,
HCBS should focus on his system. He should focus on kids that fit the system he runs. Forget recruiting these OAD kids for a system that takes a good 2 to 3 years to run. I mean think about it, if your system works best with kids that have played it for a couple years then why recruit OAD’s that are going to leave after one year?
That my friends is Fools Gold.
-
@HighEliteMajor Good post again HEM. One question. Could another reason for our precipitous drop in 3pt efficiency be attributed to injury? We have Oubre, Selden, Mason, Perry,Greene and Devonte, all of them dinged up. Some more, some less but all of them injured or recovering from injuries.
-
Three point Facts: By the numbers. I have broken down three point shooting into different ‘seasons’ to go along with the ‘fools gold’ remarks.
@HighEliteMajor @KUinLA Please put this in a line chart and insert the “fool’s gold” comments and see if we can draw correlation between the data reference points and the “fools gold comments”.
PRE UTAH 49/135 36.29%
POST UTAH 150/401 37.40%
NON-CON 83/217 38.24%
BIG 12 SEASON 108/287 37.63%
BIG 12 TOURNEY 8/32 25.00%
PRE TECH ONLY 99/256 38.67%
POST TECH ONLY 92/248 37.09%
POST TECH & B12 TOURNEY ONLY 100/280 35.71%
WITH LEGS 136/353 38.5%
NO LEGS 63/183 34.42%
*The no legs period began January 31, when it became apparent to me that the team was gassed.
TOTAL THREES
2014-2015 199/536 37.12%
2013-2014 198/528 37.50%
2012-2013 216/594 36.36%
2011-2012 222/643 34.50%
2010-2011 271/710 38.20%
2009-2010 262/648 40.40%
2008-2009 217/585 37.10%
2008-2009 271/683 39.70%
Quick inference: the fewer interior post scorers, the lower the 3pt%
-
Here’s the thing about Bill Self’s offense. It takes time to learn. It doesn’t look pretty if even one player is out of place. Subtle shifts in player placement make a huge difference. A large reason why you don’t see many kick-out threes is Greene and Oubre don’t know how to move without the ball. McLemore was awesome about finding the open space.
About player management: I’ve seen it throughout Bill’s tenure at KU; he gives the quick hook and fans howl about it. Withey sat, TRob sat, Cole sat, BUT when they played they looked pretty darn good. With unreal stats when blown up to 40 minutes per game. However Bill was using them to the teams utmost advantage and getting the absolute most out of their minutes. Given more minutes the defenses adjust and flaws are exploited (i.e. Cliff Alexander as a starter). I say Bill is masterfully using the players he has and is getting the most wins out of them possible.
Unfortuneately this year I am not overly optimistic about the tourney and would consider the sweet 16 a decent ending. I don’t see this team as being able to play lock down defense for 6 games straight or being able to play 40 minutes of good ball.
I hope to be proven wrong and get to watch KU play in 6 more games.
-
Bill Self March 13, 2012
After losing prior to the NCAA Tourney
“I kind of like it, I hate saying that. I don’t like losing, but I kind of like the fact it’s not fool’s gold with us anymore. When you make shots an don’t guard and get away with it…our guys saw first-hand what will happen in a one-and-done situation.”
I’ve always thought Bill’s reference to ‘fool’s gold’ was a reference to depending on shots to win games, and not defense.
-
@HighEliteMajor No it would not surprise me as most threes in Bill’s system are set shots by design. You aren’t going to have nearly as many set shots from 2. Too many broken plays this year have ended in rushed two point jump shots.
-
Cogent, all too plausible analysis from HEM. Is ‘bad ball’ an honest-to-god strategy? Has there ever been a NCAA champion who played in such fashion? On a side note, is “the weave” of any use other than hair extensions?
-
@Lulufulu seriously can you not figure that out? I think you can!
-
Other things to consider…
You are more likely to be fouled on a 2pt shot vs a 3pt shot.
This team excels at the free throw line.
Fouls stop the game and help rest the already tired legs of this exhausted team.
-
@Blown Not sure what stats you’re looking at -
Post Texas Tech, we have gone 32/122 from three, or 26.2%. Your numbers suggest that in 10 games we shot nearly as many three pointers as we did in the prior 24.
In the first 24 games, including Texas Tech, we were 166/406, or 40.8%. You need to double check your numbers.
We are now 198/528.
You cite “Big 12”, but this is irrelevant as the delineation is the Fool’s Gold comments and change in offensive strategy.
You cite Utah as a before and after on percentages, and I’m not sure why.
And so your premise is that our team was so tired, so gassed, that they just couldn’t shoot three pointers effectively anymore – while the rest of the college world kept draining them?
I wish I could even give a shred of credibility to that argument. I can’t.
And I guess I’m not seeing your claimed inverted relationship between post scoring and three point percentages. I know we scored at the rim at nearly 65% in 2012 and at 67% last season. But to your point, I in no way dispute the power of inside-out basketball. In fact, I’m a big fan of it when you have personnel to match.
Remember, regardless, other teams find ways to shoot threes and make them at high rates. And that’s not premised many times on post scoring. Many times, the threes and outside game create inside opportunities – ISU and WSU are good examples.
One question: So the first 25 games, we had appreciably different inside scoring than the last 9 games?
-
I was referencing the first tech game, which could be a mistake/misunderstanding on my part.
Self’s first fools gold comment was the UTAH game. Our percentage before that game, is the same as it was after. Actually slightly increased. So the fact that you think “fools gold” statements hurt their play is not credible.
They were 167/214 (I did double check and changed) up to and including the second Techgame, which was 2/3 into the season But my contention is that the decline is due to their losing their legs…
Shake it down any way you want to. This team is a 37-38% three point shooting team. I’ve demonstrated that above.
Are you of the opinion that Self has stated on multiple occasions that this team is tired and needs rest and that leg’s don’t affect jumpshots?
Could it be possible that after the second tech game Big 12 players were now seeing the hawks for a second time and scouted the 3pt shot defense better?
-
@drgnslayr that’s BS!! They drove the ball w/5 healthy athletes on the floor and our d stunk! Perry tried, but couldn’t produce. You really think Perry didn’t want the win as much? He did everything he could w/a bum leg. ISU is a great team. Did you listen to post game?
-
@HighEliteMajor said:
One question: So the first 25 games, we had appreciably different inside scoring than the last 9 games?
HEM why aren’t you giving credence to the fact that round robin scheduling and seeing a team twice can, and most likely does impact the scouting report defense?
The third time we played the teams–as I referenced in the “BIG 12 TOURNEY ONLY” data set above our 3pt % dropped all the way down to 25%. Bruce Webber showed the rest of the league how to guard the three successfully. In our second game against them we were 2/13. And the decline was on from there. Texas 1/8. WVU 015…and so on.
-
@HighEliteMajor I’m very proud to wear crimson and blue glasses, and I don’t care if you understand me. I don’t usually respond 'cause you are always right! Waste of time. Another reason I ignore you is because I avoid negative people. They tend to zap all the joy out of life. Notice that? Last week you said you had fun watching a game, I wanted to hug you!
️
As far as the “fools gold” comment, and you won’t care what I think, I believe that comment has zero to do w/our struggling long distance shooting. Zero!
-
@Blown I would tell you that I give zero credence to the balanced schedule thing. Seriously, every team has video on other teams, and many play others twice. So no, I don’t see that as a reason. Teams game plan, teams do lots of things. Coaches adjust. As I’ve said in other posts … including the Myth of Three Point Defense … coaches scheme get their looks. Other teams have been doing it all season long, and are still doing it. Again, I think we look at our little KU vacuum and think that this is the only possible way.
-
@Crimsonorblue22 My perspective on the comments and mentality of the fool’s gold deal is combined with our complete shift in offensive strategy. We all have our perspectives based on our experiences. My experiences come from, first hand, seeing how athletes are both positively and negatively affected by coaches. Folks sometimes forget that the players are still kids … they may be 18, but they are kids with all of the same insecurities as normal kids. If you’ve never experienced it, I would understand your skepticism. And, of course, it’s just my opinion.
I also understand how it is easier to go through a basketball season without critical thinking. Life is the same way. It’s much easier to accept what is given to you with a smile on your face. And it’s much easier not to challenge anything.
It’s not that I don’t understand that you are proud to wear your crimson and blue glasses. Blue pill, is blue pill. It’s a choice not to think critically.
I guess I just don’t understand the point of making snide little remarks about posters and topics, without coming to the table with any substance to challenge the thought process.
So you know, as a general rule, I typically choose to avoid folks without substance.
-
@HighEliteMajor I know you do! I have experienced it. You would be surprised.
-
@HighEliteMajor are you saying familiarity with an opponent has no bearing on performance?
-
@Blown Absolutely it does. Thats why the Big 12 is so hard to win. Each team has to play each other twice, scout each other and watch tape on each other many times. Whats that phrase about repetition?
-
@HighEliteMajor Though I do not agree with everything you are saying, especially the fact that you do not believe that familiarity (balanced scheduling) has “zero to do with it”, I did take some time and looked at your point objectively. Although it could be coincidence (I doubt it), after each fool’s gold comment, there was a steady decline. I think there are so many things going on with this team: fatigue, scouting, among other things, I have to agree with you that your point is of note.
-
March Madness voids all this complex thinking. Just take your theories and wad them up and throw them in the fireplace. They simply don’t matter. We should all know this by now. How many times has KU’s numbers been completely dominating? How many times have those numbers been proven wrong? In how many years?
I can recall at least two tourneys where KU’s numbers were exactly what some are wanting on this board, only to lose at some point in the tourney. No, the numbers don’t lie @HighEliteMajor, but those numbers only give you a picture. Then, when the teams get on the floor, it’s not the same team and we should know this at KU.
It’s simple: Who wants it more? Green is sparking, Selden is looking good, Ellis gets better (per his interview), and we can get some bench; We might just surprise a few people.
I think this tourney may provide some shocking surprises. This may be the year the numbers don’t quite support what will actually happen? Just some thoughts.
I know one thing: KU is not favored at all and frankly we are dubbed the weakest. In fact, Borzello and Eamon says the Midwest is “O.K.” apart from UK. Many have UK winning this thing and if @HighEliteMajor is correct, then let’s forgo the hassle of having a tourney this year and just give the NC to UK. They meet all @HighEliteMajor criteria.
-
@truehawk93 Excellent point truehawk.
While I agree with a lot of what you are saying HEM, I think what Self is trying to do is develop some sort of an inside game to complement the already existing perimeter game, though he could have said it in a much better way.
To what you said truehawk, you are absolutely right about pointing to our past losses in the tournament. In the past, we always seemed to finish the conference year strong, then fizzle out in the tourney. Personally, I like being overlooked and not having any expectations. As some have said here, if KU plays it right, they are probably the best equipped team to beat UK because they can spread the floor and have a stretch four.
Of course, in the end, it really is a crap shoot and is so hard to make a deep run every single year.
-
@drgnslayr We are just not quite dominate enough inside (as UK) to pound inside as in years past. Self needs to simply do some old fashioned coaching and really ‘scout’ these teams and decide what works best against each team. The old ‘pound it inside’ will not work against some of these teams. We all learned that last year against Stanford.
We’ve got to run plays that will open the floor, spread it, and go over the top. We’ll need to drive and dish. High screens are great, but rather than the predictable “pick and roll,” lets see some high ball screens for Oubre, Green, Selden, and maybe Mason. Self is too predictable.
Lastly, Ellis has got to be healthy PERIOD. If not, we’re done. I hate it, but ISU proved that. A healthy Ellis would’ve been a W.
-
@truehawk93 Hopefully he’ll do his best coaching in the tournament.
-
@truehawk93 said:
Ellis has got to be healthy PERIOD. If not, we’re done. I hate it, but ISU proved that. A healthy Ellis would’ve been a W.
I agree. But, every time I get negative and doomsdayish, I stop and think about who could beat ISU… There aren’t more than 12 teams as good as or better than ISU and we played them very close sans Cliff and with Ellis at 60%.
Ellis’s health will determine how far we get, but we might be able to get a game or two into this tourney with Ellis. That said, I’m pretty apprehensive about Wichita State, with or without Ellis. They are probably the worst ‘karma’ matchup we could have other than Illinois or Missouri (neither of which made the tournament).
-
@RedRooster Really! What’s Bill say in the huddle when we’re down 2 possessions with 30 seconds left? “Okay guys, lets go out there and get some of that Fool’s Gold!”
-
Very interesting stat I heard last night – one commentator said UK had shot 529 three pointers this season. That sounded familiar.
UK shot 529. Kansas 528.
UK scores at 69.3% at the rim. KU 56.5%.
-
@HighEliteMajor 69.3% include the second shots?
-
@HawksWin probably all dunks! Should be.
-
Average height of KU’s most used front line (Ellis, Traylor, Oubre, Alexander) - a generous 6’-7"
Average height of UK’s most used front line (Cauley-Stein, Towns, Lyles, Johnson) - a conservative 6’-11"+
Context, context, context…
-
@HawksWin Yes, it does.
And for what it is worth, this stat has nothing to do with context. The stat shows that we, by and large, have difficulty scoring at the rim. UK is tremendous at the rim.
Yet we shoot the same number of three pointers. When you have difficulty scoring at the rim, a random thought might be that other options should be exploited.
I do understand that some folks mightily resist that.
-
And for what it is worth, this stat has nothing to do with context. The stat shows that we, by and large, have difficulty scoring at the rim. UK is tremendous at the rim.
And you don’t think the 5" difference in height for the front lines makes a difference when scoring at the rim? wow and I mean WOW!
-
@HighEliteMajor So here’s my follow-up question. Since 69.3% includes the 2nd shots, am I safe to assume footers on KY team are effective as rebounders? What about second shots for KU 3s? We all agree that KU is not a rebounding team this year. Wow, we dropped as many 3s as UK, and UK scored 70% of the time while KU 57%! I don’t have the knowledge of the game as you or others, but based on those 2 numbers, KU shouldn’t bank on 3s against UK or anyone with footers/rebounders. Sorry HEM, but I can’t agree with you on dropping more 3s. It’d be like spending $10 on lotto to win $6.
-
@HawksWin One of the keys to beating UK is to get hot from three. That opens up the lane to drive and kick out for three point shots.
-
@drgnslayr I believe ISU led our league in 2pt FG%. Outside-In same effect as Inside-Out potentially. As has been mentioned, need to play to the current players/team’s strengths.
Inside game is probably a more consistent force and partly responsbile for Self’s better success (total picture) than his currrent coaching peers as far as consistency, and probably reason for the Conference win streak since it wins road games, but not sure that it has proven itself on the big stage getting to the winner’s circle in the final game.
-
@sfbahawk Even BG’s game has changed since the FG comment. He’s driving to the basket more than he ever did.
-
@DoubleDD Or adjust to the new environment.
-
@Bwag That’s good. You have to keep the defender honest. Forte from OSU as a very good 3 pt shooter also went to the basket more this year. It appears that Forte is also in a bit of a slump now.
-
@HawksWin If you are a poor rebounding team, then it is much better for you to change the normal rebounding dynamic. Most rebounds are close to the basket, thus that stat reflects interior rebounding more than anything.
The longer the shot, the longer the rebound (generally). So, if you are a poor rebounding team, a longer shot provides you a better opportunity for a rebound. The bounce of the ball is more random, the longer the shot.
Against UK, you’d rather have longer rebounds, as it will generally bounce farther away from the basket. So that, again, supports more three pointers.
@DinarHawk - For us to beat UK, we’d likely need a 12/23 from three type of night. We just aren’t beating them playing the game we’re playing now. But I think we could if we’re hot from three, and stretch their D, and create opportunities to get to the hoop.
-
@Bwag I’m not anti-BG … but he is a one-dimensional player in my book. Some may disagree, but I think Svi is better at literally every aspect of the game except for three point shooting. I would not play BG if his three gun isn’t a focus when he is in. Maybe others see that differently.
-
@HighEliteMajor You are correct that Svi is better at most things other than 3s. Removing Svi from the equation, that was exactly my point in a previous response to you. BG is out there to shoot 3s. When Self plays him at critical times such as the second half on Saturday, it is only because he has confidence that BG is the best 3 pt option. I am assuming that BG is not stupid and knows that he is not out there for his stellar defense. Therefore the infamous “fools gold” comments should not have a deleterious affect on his confidence as you have previously claimed.
-
@sfbahawk I understand that you disagree. You seem pretty confident that a coach cannot affect a shooter’s confidence level. Do you agree that a coach can help a shooter gain confidence? Do agree that confidence can help an athlete’s performance? Do agree that shooting the basketball involves a freedom of thought and mind? If you agree to the prior three questions, do you also agree that the converse is also true?
But I disagree with your premise. I do not think Self has Greene out there solely because of three point shooting. You and I may agree on the Svi comparison. I don’t think Self does. I do think that part of the reason why Greene is out there is because of the three point threat. Meaning, teams respecting that shot. I do think that Self sees Greene as being satisfactory in many areas, and I think he trusts Greene right now more than Svi.
I do understand your argument. But remember, my point is that the comments sent him into a spiral and changed the entire offensive dynamic – and hole from which he has not dug out.
