Juneteenth
-
@benshawks08 but just because you grew up in an almost entirely white world, that doesn’t mean you aren’t sensitive to any human’s feelings and conditions now.
-
@benshawks08 I don’t think my interpretation is narrow at all. I think yours is narrow because you think it unbelievable that anyone would not see the discrimination towards Black Americans in that book. I can accept that someone might see race in it, I just don’t think it’s the most logical conclusion. People don’t pay someone to make them a different race. I think you are ignoring the McBean element entirely because it’s not convenient to your narrative.
-
@approxinfinity https://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/global-currents/profiting-from-the-skin-lightening-trade
-
@approxinfinity I’m focusing on the central conflict in the story because of its obvious connection to race and segregation. The McBean element is part of why the story is problematic. I’d liken that character to major corporations pitting the lower class folks against each other based on race to continue to line their own pockets while not honestly caring about any of them.
-
@benshawks08 said in Juneteenth:
@approxinfinity I’m focusing on the central conflict in the story because of its obvious connection to race and segregation. The McBean element is part of why the story is problematic. I’d liken that character to major corporations pitting the lower class folks against each other based on race to continue to line their own pockets while not honestly caring about any of them.
You said the magic words here. Pitting lower class folks against each other. This is a book about class, not race.
-
@benshawks08 said in Juneteenth:
@approxinfinity https://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/global-currents/profiting-from-the-skin-lightening-trade
Lol, yes I know. I didn’t think you’d go here. So that’s what this book is about?
-
@approxinfinity said in Juneteenth:
@benshawks08 said in Juneteenth:
@approxinfinity I’m focusing on the central conflict in the story because of its obvious connection to race and segregation. The McBean element is part of why the story is problematic. I’d liken that character to major corporations pitting the lower class folks against each other based on race to continue to line their own pockets while not honestly caring about any of them.
You said the magic words here. Pitting lower class folks against each other. This is a book about class, not race.
In the US how do you talk about one without the other?
And how are those classes being pitted? Appearance they were born with.
-
@benshawks08 I appreciate you caring deeply about black Americans. I really do. But it IS possible to talk about class without race. If not in the abstraction of a kids book with fuzzy creatures with star bellies that they pay to remove and add back then where?
-
@approxinfinity said in Juneteenth:
@benshawks08 said in Juneteenth:
@approxinfinity https://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/global-currents/profiting-from-the-skin-lightening-trade
Lol, yes I know. I didn’t think you’d go here. So that’s what this book is about?
No it isn’t. I’m just saying ignoring the racial undertones of the conflict of the story seems like purposefully pulling the wool over ones eyes.
-
Opinions are fun, but sometimes facts help. According to Wikipedia, Dr. Seuss expressly stated that The Sneetches had its origins in his opposition to anti-Semitism (quoted in fn 4). It was even distributed in Bosnia by NATO to try to encourage tolerance between Serbs and Croatians.
-
@mayjay good looking out.
Ok. A simpler time. Where all he had to fight was outright persecution and not systemic racism, economic disparity, and implicit bias, etc.
-
@mayjay said in Juneteenth:
Opinions are fun, but sometimes facts help. According to Wikipedia, Dr. Seuss expressly stated that The Sneetches had its origins in his opposition to anti-Semitism (quoted in fn 4). It was even distributed in Bosnia by NATO to try to encourage tolerance between Serbs and Croatians.
Were the stars on the Sneetches the dead giveaway? EL EM AY OH
-
@approxinfinity said in Juneteenth:
@mayjay good looking out.
Ok. A simpler time. Where all he had to fight was outright persecution and not systemic racism, economic disparity, and implicit bias, etc.
Just checking my snark meter here. You are not disputing that all of those things were still present in that simpler time, right?
-
@mayjay said in Juneteenth:
Opinions are fun, but sometimes facts help. According to Wikipedia, Dr. Seuss expressly stated that The Sneetches had its origins in his opposition to anti-Semitism (quoted in fn 4). It was even distributed in Bosnia by NATO to try to encourage tolerance between Serbs and Croatians.
So…racism. At least for me and my current understanding, anti Semitism and racism go hand and hand as almost but not quite exactly the same thing. I may be wrong there as I haven’t explicitly studied the connection between the two. But from what I’ve seen anti-Semitism is often under the larger umbrella of racism, similar to anti-Blackness.
-
@benshawks08 Do I think that the persecution of Jews in this country was equivalent to the systemic racism that black Americans have experienced? No, not even close. Do you? I misspoke. What I meant was that the thought process when writing a children’s book back then probably could be more straightforward. Take an idea for a catchy story and run with it. Don’t sweat how much it applies.
Being inspired by the fight against antisemitism when writing a children’s book with fuzzy creatures that are divisive and then inclusive after they get swindled is a far cry from attempting to write a book that specifically addresses the state of systemic racism against black Americans half a century later.
Where Seuss landed with the plot doesnt address any real problems or solutions around antisemitism either, and I don’t think he was specifically trying to. His book imo is only directly applicable when addressing class differences in school aged children, and not being a shit. Why does it have to be more than a parable about being inclusive and being comfortable in your own skin?
I don’t understand the incessant need to make everything about modern racial strife. It’s emotionally suffocating. I don’t see anything wrong with this book at all.
-
@approxinfinity Where I’m coming from big picture is that the teaching of most history, art, etc. tends to take your approach of not making it about race even when as @mayjay pointed out, the author was actually trying to address it. I think it is irresponsible to read a fictional book about discrimination and not connect it to the very real discrimination that has been going on in our society. Just as I think it is irresponsible to teach the amazing accomplishments of the founding fathers, triumphs of american spirit, etc. without acknowledging and investigating the faults.
I think the preference for many people to talk about class while ignoring race is equally irresponsible.
I think it is easier for most people to assume things aren’t about race, than to actually confront the racism baked into our lives.
To me that’s where this whole Dr. Seuss extravaganza we just went on started and where I end up with it.
-
@benshawks08 Did Seuss write a book about race or a parable about not being divisive? Just because he was inspired by it doesn’t mean that it’s what the book was intended to convey. I think the book was generally about not being a shit. Not interpreting it the way you do does not make me irresponsible. That’s not how literature works.
-
@approxinfinity And to me part of not being a shit is recognizing that systematically excluding a group from society on the basis of their appearance is racist and bad.
And while you can interpret texts however you want, “literature” does not mean any interpretation is valid. To be clear I’m not saying your interpretation is invalid, but rather incomplete.
-
Long, but really interesting read on how language and thought has changed over the last 5ish years. https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/media-great-racial-awakening
-
@benshawks08 said in Juneteenth:
@approxinfinity And to me part of not being a shit is recognizing that systematically excluding a group from society on the basis of their appearance is racist and bad.
Can you be racist against glasses wearers? How about racist against people in sports cars? Racist against people that wear leather? Racist against everyone who sings in public? Racist against everyone who hikes? Racist against people that shop at Kroger?
Are you suggesting that by not interpreting the book as being specifically antiracist, I am in fact a racist? That seems to jive with the “with us or against us” vibe around this whole discussion.
-
@approxinfinity Ah yes. All those times people weren’t allowed to eat, visit beaches, play sports and generally associate with the rest of society because of their glasses
-
@approxinfinity Hitler killed Jews because he believed they are an inferior race. While that may not comport with modern sensibilities of religion versus race, the fact remains that much of anti-Semitism is based on the believe that Jews are a race. The period when Dr. Seuss wrote this story was the '50s, when the Holocaust’s causes and effects were very much on people’s minds. I doubt it was divorced from the burgeoning civil rights movement.
In the Anne Frank House website, you will find this valuable lesson:
“Conclusion: Jews are not a race, and categorising people according to race is wrong and dangerous. Even so, some people still believe in the concept. If it is the basis for their hatred of Jews, it is undoubtedly racist.”
Your continued effort to draw distinctions about racism is a throwback, in my mind, to our dispute about HEM. I am reminded of the Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart’s discussion of hard-core pornography. He said he would not try to delineate all the things that might be entailed in that phrase, “But I know it when I see it.”
-
@approxinfinity said in Juneteenth:
@benshawks08 said in Juneteenth:
@approxinfinity And to me part of not being a shit is recognizing that systematically excluding a group from society on the basis of their appearance is racist and bad.
Are you suggesting that by not interpreting the book as being specifically antiracist, I am in fact a racist? That seems to jive with the “with us or against us” vibe around this whole discussion.
Anywhere where I called you a racist? Said it was one way OR another? My entire point has been yes AND. I continually point out that I prefer not to call any person A Racist and focus instead on using the term as an adjective as I feel it’s more productive that way. And even in this discussion have I labeled any of your actions as racist?
-
@benshawks08 not being invited to a Frankfurter party is not the same thing as not being allowed to eat.
-
@approxinfinity said in Juneteenth:
@benshawks08 not being invited to a Frankfurter party is not the same thing as not being allowed to eat.
Perhaps my grammar was unclear. That with was working for all the List before it. Eat with, play sports with etc.
-
@mayjay yeah. The Holocaust was bad. I didn’t dispute that. What I said was that racism toward black people in this country has been much worse that what Jews have experienced in this country. More systemic,more implicit bias, longer, etc. I think that’s a pretty safe statement all things considered.
Also, yes i tried to make distinctions about the label of racism being bandied about so freely then when discussing HEM, as I do now, and I am no less convicted now as I was then, that people must be careful in their language and considerations regarding anti-racism if they actually want to make lasting positive change.
If we just want to argue endlessly, then by all means, lets continue to try to eradicate distinctions.
-
@approxinfinity No real reason that I can see to think Seuss’s intent was to deal with American discrimination. The lessons are universal, which is clear from his use of non-identifiable cartoon characters.
-
@mayjay ok well i wasnt attempting to argue that American racism towards blacks is worse than the Holocaust. In my mind a genocide is a whole different monster than racism. It would be a whole different discussion to debate that. That just wasn’t my intent.
I don’t think the message of the Sneetches was to not exterminate another race. Sneetches was written in 1961 so I consider any inspiration to address antisemitism on Seuss’s part to be as it existed at that time.
-
@benshawks08 said in Juneteenth:
@approxinfinity Ah yes. All those times people weren’t allowed to eat, visit beaches, play sports and generally associate with the rest of society because of their glasses
Actually, there were times I was on the receiving end of prejudice because I wore some thick glasses and crappy clothes as a kid. I definitely was excluded from activities, wasn’t welcome to eat with certain people at school, and got bullied at time because of my appearance. So yeah, the book resonated with me there.
Am I not allowed to relate to the book on my terms? Does the book have to be about another group because that’s my responsibility? Seriously?
-
@approxinfinity Published as a book with other stories in 1961, but originally as a story in Redbook magazine in July 1953. 8 years after the liberation of Europe.
I am only trying to get you to understand that the distinctions you make, in order to avoid labeling, play into the hands of people who use subtleties to disguise their true animus. As long as well-intentioned people like you provide HEMs with that type of cover for fear of “ending a discussion”, they will get away with it. Because they make pronouncements, they do not want to discuss.
-
@benshawks08 said in Juneteenth:
@approxinfinity said in Juneteenth:
@benshawks08 said in Juneteenth:
@approxinfinity And to me part of not being a shit is recognizing that systematically excluding a group from society on the basis of their appearance is racist and bad.
Are you suggesting that by not interpreting the book as being specifically antiracist, I am in fact a racist? That seems to jive with the “with us or against us” vibe around this whole discussion.
Anywhere where I called you a racist? Said it was one way OR another? My entire point has been yes AND. I continually point out that I prefer not to call any person A Racist and focus instead on using the term as an adjective as I feel it’s more productive that way. And even in this discussion have I labeled any of your actions as racist?
No, it was honestly a question, albeit a loaded one, to discern what you meant by:
@approxinfinity And to me part of not being a shit is recognizing that systematically excluding a group from society on the basis of their appearance is racist and bad.
My point was the book was about not being a shit, so I read this as you saying that one should either see this book is about racism, or they are a shit. Sure ok maybe you just called me a shit and not a racist? Lol. Point taken.
-
@mayjay no man. Haven’t you learned anything from Star Wars (lol): Only a Sith deals in absolutes.
As I said before, I have no problem at all calling out things that should change (orientalist caracatures, ex), things that people do without intent (unconscious bias) and things that people do of a racial nature with deliberation (racism).
I don’t think we should abandon the attempt to draw proper distinction ever, even if our president is a raging piece of shit racist who does most of what he does mafia style to obfuscate his intent behind a layer of plausible deniability. I think he should be called out for every deplorable thing that he is, not in the least of which is a racist. There’s enough evidence that this is undeniable. To that end, I appreciate the article about the rise of racial talking points in the media pre Trump @FarmerJayhawk and need to read that so I can appreciate a little more fully the powder keg he ignited. My point is, these are rare times. But we shouldn’t abandon our attempt to define standards to accommodate them.
I do hear you @mayjay that you may know it when you see it, but that’s a slippery and very subjective slope.
-
@approxinfinity Never was I trying to say you are a shit and apologies if that’s the impact my statements had on you. Also, your personal relations to the book are 100% valid. As @mayjay pointed out, the specific use of cartoons makes the story purposefully more relatable and broad. And I again want to reiterate that your interpretation is VALID and meaningful to you and that’s great. But to state the book isn’t about race and these “anti-racists” who try to make everything about race need to leave the book alone I think is limiting and frankly just not correct. I do feel like it’s everyone’s responsibility to work to end racism and if we don’t start having these conversations with kids when they are VERY young, it is a missed opportunity.
It’s amazing that the book connects with you on such a personal level. I’m so glad you shared. Now wouldn’t it also to be great to see all the other perspectives that connected to that story. Like those that connected based on race, sexuality, gender identity, and on and on into perpetuity.
I recognize right now I’m most focused on race because for me systemic racism is an existential threat for the people in my community. So yeah I’m going to look for every opportunity to center the stories and perspectives of those who have been violently shoved to the margins for so long.
-
@approxinfinity said in Juneteenth:
Only a Sith deals in absolutes.
I realize my reference to Jar Jar revealed my familiarity with the storyline, but how the hell did you know that I just finished watching (for the first time since 2005) “Revenge of the Sith” literally 3 hours ago???
Hacking into my tablet are we? Cameras placed in my family room have you put? Asked for whatever consequences you will suffer have you!
-
Lol I gotta pause here guys @mayjay @benshawks08 (I like where we ended up on your last post) . A good stopping point for tonight for me. I really appreciate the thoughtful conversation. Needed it. I’ve been deep in a shell for like a month and this is the first I’ve really felt like talking. Thank you.
