Tarik Black waived by the Rockets...
-
I am feeling a bit contrary, so I am going to take on Hudy today.
This team looks and plays like wounded soldiers in a MASH tent.
Last years team did, too.
And frankly teams the last several years have.
The team that played Kentucky in the finals of 2012 was pretty much playing on joints held together by bailing wire and ankle boots and sexy knee lingerie.
Our guys are gimpier than a bunch of Octogenarian Rockettes.
If science can’t do better than this, then, by god, Chaplain, I want an injury prayer. We shouldn’t have to fight Kentucky and joint problems, too! I’m in good with the almighty, Chaplain. If Hudy’s training regimes don’t keep us healthy, then you write a good injury prayer and I guaran-damn-ty you that the good lord will listen.
That is all.
-
@drgnslayr said:
… Hudy’s regiment.
She’s not an Army officer. You mean regimen.
I’m sure you all hate grammar policemen, but this isn’t grammar. I hate losing good words and conflation does that. Compliment <> complement, affect <> effect.
On Hudy, I frankly agree with jaybate: if she’s so great at getting player’s bodies ready, why do we have so many injuries? Why do some players seem to lose athleticism during their careers here?
Maybe protecting the merchandise isn’t such a bad idea.
-
I agree with you. Hudy is at the very top of college trainers and being in a university environment she is a logical candidate to be part of research studies.
However, the majority of trainers for professional franchises are equally or better qualified; they just keep a low profile and keep their methods and resources confidential since it gives them an advantage in a world of super high prized athletes. The training they do is also quite different; in college trainers work with young men and the main objective is to smooth the transition from the HS to the college level and develop their young bodies. In the pros they are working with grown men that by and large are, at the peak of their development and the emphasis is keeping them healthy throughout the season. A good number of professional; athletes also have their own (and very expensive) trainers.
-
I think the key to that question lies in the emphasis that @JayHawkFanToo pointed out. Hudy is focused on developing strength and power. Her methods for developing more strength and power can be seen in a lot of the research and writings that she has been involved with (very good work, I might add).
However, at the pro level, the emphasis isn’t so much on developing strength as it is on the conditioning/ health side of things. The season is long and hard. Pro strength and conditioning coaches have to make sure their guys (or girls) stay healthy moreso than developing more strength.
I believe this is the difference. Hudy is developing power/strength to assist in athletic development to potentially move an athlete from good to elite… Pro coaches are developing endurance/stamina/ muscle tolerance to help an athlete stay elite.
-
@JayHawkFanToo except they are now working more w/19 year old OAD’s. So many injuries this year. What do you attribute that to? I would think it would be easier for a 19 year old to go thru their long and grinding season. So much more physical too! Maybe I’ve just been watching more, just to follow our guys. I can’t even imagine Embiid going a whole season w/out getting injured.
-
I still maintain the average 21 year old has a lot over a 19 year old in terms of physical strength and endurance. Yes-some of these athletes bodies have matured further than others in the same amount of time but if you compare photos between these two ages you will see a difference in their muscular build. I think diet plays a part as well. The difference between what mom serves the family at home compared to the training table at a top college program pays huge benefits to the athlete.
-
I’ve always wondered if there are any Ankle exercises that would prevent the serious sprain. The problem is that everyone who accidentally steps on another’s foot always ends up screaming and grabbing the ankle.
-
“I’m sure you all hate grammar policemen, but this isn’t grammar.”
Sorry… I dropped the ball on that one. Actually, I don’t hate grammar police and appreciate when someone makes corrections.
-
We all need to step back and look at this closer (concerning Hudy).
Her job is to increase the athleticism of a teenagers, while trying to limit injuries.
There is a conflict in that statement. By increasing the athleticism in teenagers, it puts them at more risk, too.
When you jump higher you are putting an exponential amount of additional impact on your joints. When you learn to make more aggressive lateral cuts, you are putting an exponential amount of additional stress on tendons, cartilage and tissues.
Now consider that we are also talking about teenagers. They may have the most flexible bones (comparing to older athletes), but many areas of their body have not matured and are vulnerable to injuries.
I like what @justanotherfan said, when comparing college to pros. Pro training is more about maintaining endurance and preventing injuries. Most athletes in the pros are not working hard to increase their vertical by several inches. They are interested in protecting their investment because they are already signed with a club. And these athletes are true adults, matured anatomies that have already established strengths and weaknesses, and these players are heavily coached into paying attention to their bodies to prevent injuries.
College basketball is about development… seeing how much improvement players can make during that period. Add that to their youth and you create additional risk.
Pro ball is about endurance. Long seasons playing way too many games. Their injuries are more a testament of repetitive stresses.
I think Hudy does an outstanding job.
If I have a gripe it is about nutrition. There is not enough focus on contemporary sports nutrition. Kansas could leap over all of college basketball if they got on the stick with contemporary sports nutrition. Get these kids off of sports bars and Gatorade and on to real nutrition. It would impact their health and performance considerably.
-
Every year the game is played at a higher level; the average athlete of today is more developed than the average athlete of 30 years ago, so naturally there is a bigger risk if injury, furthermore, 30 years ago, the younger players did not play as much and the upper class-men players carried the load and were better prepared physically to do that; that is no longer the case and first year players are expected to contribute. Also new training methods have helped reduce injuries and if you look at injuries over the years I will guess the number of injuries has not changed dramatically, what has changed is the access we have to information that makes us more aware of them. 30 years ago, the only way to know about injuries was to read the newspaper or listen to sports shows on the radio, now with the Internet, all that information is readily available.
-
I don’t know much about HS sports 30 years ago, but 40 years ago there was not club sports in KC year round. You changed sports with seasons so while skill development didn’t happen as quick for a similar sport (say basketball) you had the benefit of a season off to rest certain muscles for a different season. To this day I know football players had to adjust to bBall, just as bBall had to adjust to track, etc, etc.
Playing bBall year round now your skills have a huge advantage over someone who only did it 4 months a year.
-
My post was in reference to college basketball and not necessarily HS. There is no question that the college game (and by extension the HS game) is played at much higher level now than it was 40 years ago. With higher level of play there is a bigger chance of injury, however, the better training methods probably offset the injuries, so it is probably a wash, and I would guess the number of injuries has remained the same. Just my personal observation and I could be wrong.
-
@JayHawkFanToo Wow, thats very interesting. Adidas is the uniform for the NBA?? Seriously, what does that mean as far as Adidas’ pull on the market…regarding @jaybate-1.0 and his conspiracy theory of the ShoeCos?
-
@JayHawkFanToo I see that now-sorry about taking your post the wrong direction.
-
@jaybate-1.0 Ok so I posted my last question without first reading your lengthy “hypothesizing” which was very interesting by the way. Leading me to ask some questions about said topic.
Coaches in the L. How are they contracted? They aren’t the athletes out there wearing the flashy brand name shoes for marketing purposes.
The Asymmetries of talent distribution in the L and Div1; Might you elaborate on your theory of that? Let me take a poke at it first though. Since Kentucky is probly a Nike school, the AAU teams funded by Nike $ funnel their players towards that school and vice versa for Adidas schools like KU. I imagine if there are NBA teams that are Nike & Adidas then they might draft players as such also?
-
@Lulufulu NBA is adidas.
-
If I recall correctly, one of our august members indicated that the NBA apparel is contracted with adidas, but players are free to contract on shoes as they prefer. Right?
-
@jaybate-1.0 of course, a million shoe deals there. Well, close!
-
Lots. And I do not recall what percent are Nike and what percent are adidas. It would be interesting to see if the proportion were at all similar to proportions of schools, coaches and major summer league teams. or sharply different.
-
Correct. If I recall correctly I also posted a link with the player distribution by brand.
-
@JayHawkFanToo did you enjoy the game from the comforts of your home? Maybe a little darts at half w/SZ in the bulls eye?
-
Sorry I have forgotten it. Thanks for letting me know. If you know where it might be let me know. Thanks.
-
I enjoyed the game (and result) on the big screen while staying warm with this blanket my daughter hand made for me for Christmas…I am one happy Jayhawk.
-
@JayHawkFanToo that’s an awesome gift! She must really love her dad!
️
-
Thanks.
-
4th post from the top, last line…
