Doke and Mitch and Life’s a B$&%#!
-
@BShark Sorry, based on performance in games, so Billy P so far is a 1.
-
@jaybate-1.0 I have heard Dedric will be a hub, not in that exact jb terminology but it will be interesting to see if it plays out that way.
-
@mayjay Well, that’s true. Well more of a 0 or unrated maybe.
-
@jaybate-1.0 Nice idea, but that is a different scale as you describe it (based on Self’s use, etc). The goal here is to be able to talk about the various levels of good vs bad as college bb players.
Other scales could be developed for “glue” players so that we could argue incessantly with Brady haters!
-
@BShark But, hopefully Billy becomes the fastest rising player in the lengthy history of the distinguished Mayjay Scale!
-
mayjay said:
@BShark But, hopefully Billy becomes the fastest rising player in the lengthy history of the distinguished Mayjay Scale!
The general vibe around the situation appears to be more positive now. Could be nothing though…
-
Maybe I did not make myself clear. The hub player is based solely and entirely on ability, development and performance. It is because he is far the best most complete and MUA dominant player at that time on the team that Self makes him the hub.
Therefore he would necessarily rank at either the ultimate, or penultimate, classification of player.
An OAD recruit may be a great talent, but is he capable of being the hub? Most aren’t. Rush and Embiid were by about one third of the season. Wiggins clearly was, but elected not to. Chalmers was offered the role, as a freshman, but was not up to it.
And so on.
The hub role is probably the most reliable indicator of the peak talent level of a player available. It is a gold standard and so a benchmark against which to rank in descending order all your other categories.
Each of your categories should reflect degrees of falling short of the hub players completeness in all the categories you usefully address.
Ranking is a relational game requiring a standard.
The player capable of being the hub is at the apex of your rank order.
All of the categories you define are essentially degrees of falling short of the hub standard.
But it’s your ranking, so I am only a consultant on this.
-
Self has many gifts and abilities as a coach, but one is his uncanny ability to reliably identify, develop, and scheme around hub players, especially knowing when to risk they are ready.
If you hear scuttlebutt that Self is viewing Dedric that way, then I would NEVER bet against Dedric in that role!
Lawson has had the rep of having lots of stretch potential; ie, inside and outside on both ends.
And Self has developed as many stretch talents as any D1 coach the last 10 years when you recall Rush, Marcus, TROB, Wigs, Perry, Josh, etc. Frankly I don’t recall any other coach the last decade developing stretch 3s AND stretch 4s, but I’m sure there must have been some.
Self is human though. He is not as reliable in picking projects that can become the kinds of rotation players he will require. Jamari never quite became what he was apparently anticipating. Injury starting his third year or so probably had something to do with that shortfall. Jam only had a brief stretch of playing with both the uninjured potential Self sought to develop, and the developed skills one needs in D1. And even it was such a brief burst of lane driving and exploding for plays that it did not appreciably improve the stats HEM rightfully sights. Even so Self still got to 30 win seasons relying on Jamari quite a lot, so even in these sorts of players he is head and shoulders above most coaches. It’s doubtful Calipari would even take a flyer on players like Jamari at UK, though he appeared to some at Memphis.
-
I don’t know? I kind of like Mitch. In this day in age of a player with a little talent leaving early. It’s kind of refreshing to see a player that will stick around for awhile. Will he be a super star? No. But I can see a Landon Lucas type senior year out of the kid.
Ask yourself this question? After 4 years of Mitch? Who you going to really remember? Some OAD or old subpar Mitch that is only good enough to go over seas and play?
I was lucky enough to hear a Kentucky basketball radio show a couple weeks ago in my travels. Talk about hard reality. One caller after another was calling in complaining they didn’t know any of the players, and no desire to. Seeing how they’d be leaving after the season was over anyways. It wasn’t something I hadn’t considered. Always thought UK fans were just giddy to have the top talent rolling in year after year. It was an eye opener for me.
Everybody loves winning. Yet being a KU fan one of my greatest pleasures is seeing kids like Mitch gut it out for 4 years. You get to know them. You create a bond with them. You can actually see the improvement in their game. Take Svi for example? The kid is putting on a show this year. Showing aspects of his game I wasn’t sure was even there.
Besides Mitch has a nice stroke from three land. LOL
-
I like Mitch, I really do. He tries hard and loves KU. He is fine to have on the roster. I don’t think anyone would argue that.
Keep in mind with Landen though… if Doke stays healthy, even Landen doesn’t have a Landen sr year.
-
BShark said:
I like Mitch, I really do. He tries hard and loves KU. He is fine to have on the roster. I don’t think anyone would argue that.
Keep in mind with Landen though… if Doke stays healthy, even Landen doesn’t have a Landen sr year.
HUH? I’m a little confused. Help me understand what you’re saying. I’m a little slow too.
-
@DoubleDD LLs minutes with a healthy Doke go from 25 mpg to about 10 a year ago. The same is said for Mitch with a eligible Billy, prob only gets 8 or 10 a night.
-
Oh I see. Yea good point. Yet take away the numbers and Mitch can step of the bench and be a player that doesn’t hurt but helps? Wouldn’t that be worth it?
-
@kjayhawks helped me understand your point. Yea You would be right.
Yet what be cooler than seeing Old Mitch starting on senior night with a star studded KU team?
Ah man that would be great. Right?
-
DoubleDD said:
Yet what be cooler than seeing Old Mitch starting on senior night with a star studded KU team?
Ah man that would be great. Right?
Yep, sounds awesome.
-
Some this and that , Stats to throw out for you interest : - - KU avg 94.2 ppg , - - -53.1 fg% - - - 43 % - 3pt - - 69.6 ft % - -42,4 rpg - -for a plus 8 on the boards - -20.8 assists per game - - 10 steals per game & 6.6 bpg - - -those 10 steals per and ^.6Blocks are pretty sweet.
Now -for all you fence riders lmao - -just kidding now don’t go and get your drawers all in a bunch - -BUT if you wnna hop on Mitch’s train - -time to climb aboard - - - WOO - WOO - -all aboard. LOl.
Mitch right now: 62.5 fg % - - 66.7 - -3pt % - - 83.3 ft % - - -3.8 rpg - - 13 blocks ( which leads the team ) - -15.4 mpg. - - Now his 3pt shot has increased dramatically from last year - he kept saying he could hit the 3 - - AND - - -he was 2-12 last year from the free throw line, HUGE improvement there also - -all in repetition. - -SO don’t delay - jump on the train enjoy the ride - -no room for nay sayers lmao. - NOW you all have to know or should know - I’m just a joshin, pulling your cords - don’t blow a gasket - -just messin around with Mitch for some yukes - well at least to a certain degree anyways But seriously I’m proud of his effort for sure. - - -ROCK CHALK ALL DAY LONG BABY
-
@mayjay Your suggested 1-10 scale is terrific. We’re going to have to make good use of that going forward. Making the subjective to be objective shows how the subjective is most of the time objective – i.e., the eye test. The most reliable of all.
-
@DoubleDD He means that Lucas sits and Doke plays. Lucas would have been the backup.
-
@HighEliteMajor Thanks. What it showed to me is that to try put some distinctions into the ratings of current team members is almost problematic because they have played so well. We are pretty lucky to have such an athletic and talented team with no 1 to 3s among the schollies so far. Conf play might result in some moves.
The key in the bottom half seems to be finding positives that may bump somebody up. Top half, find negatives that bump them down.
It is the Wayne Seldens and Kelly Oubres that are hard for me because their brilliant play, if consistent, seems like it would have made them 8s at least, able to take over almost any game. But they did not do that nearly enough so to me they were 7s.
Collison senior year was an 8.5 or 9. An interesting discussion could be had on Chenowith, whose reputation was not as good as it should have been. Rep probably would be 5.5 but career stats probably should earn him a 6 to 6.5. We might wish we had another one of those this year.
-
@jaybate-1.0 but again, I think your designation goes to usage. I like keeping it cleaner as proposed - a kinda neutral scale that transcends team.
-
@DoubleDD amen. UK fan at work has taken on the approach you described for the last several years. No buy in to the team. Will rejoice if they win, but even their last push to NC wasn’t thrilling to him.
-
I see almost all of Self’s comments about players as having a manipulative component to them as Coach Speak often does. Saying Mitch was the best player today gives Mitch a boost and digs the rest of the team so win win. TBH he was pretty effective and for once he appeared not to be running about dazed and confused. Yes the opposition was not top of the line but he has looked scattered against worse teams this season.
I like Mitch a lot, if he wasn’t stuck in the 2nd big role, at least for now, I believe he would do a pretty fair job as 3rd big and as 4th big he would be just fine. He is being forced to grow into a position he wasn’t chosen for and probably even he didn’t expect this soon. Mitch needed a quality performance to help settle him into his current role. It won’t make him anymore capable but I’m hoping it lets him settle down and use the capability he has consistently. Don’t get me wrong, not advocating more minutes for him 10 plus or minus 5 is what he should be getting at this point and I hope that is what is needed from him in the near future.
Also, note the free throw percentage improvement? If he continues to settle down he might get some end game minutes just for that alone
-
@mayjay Wilt should be your 10, who is this Magic guy?
Imho Mitch is a good basketball player, much better than 99% of all high school players (he was a top150 player). But Mitch will not be a star at KU or on he collegiate level period. This doesn’t make him a bad player, just not exceptional. He fills a roll and that’s all we can expect from him. He doesn’t have immense talent that he’s wasting (ie Bragg) he’s giving what he’s got and in doing so he’s making the rest of the team better. He’s a Jayhawk through and through, so much so he had to tell a Sr. with a bad attitude and a bitchin’ stache how to play the game KUs way.
-
@dylans I never had the chance to see Wilt play in college, so I omitted him. Certainly no slight intended!
-
PHOF
-
Wilt was the ultimate hub player.
His average MUA was so enormous that even .550 FT shooting did not matter.
Everything in competitive sport is about MUA.
All strategy and tactics, all training and team work and psychological training are geared to achieve maximum sustainable MUA.
This is why the hub player should be the benchmark and paramount criterion of any ranking system.
The player with the greatest Average Sustainable MUA—the hub player—is the top rank!
-
@jaybate-1-0 I got to watch most of the Duke vs. TX game and Texas bigs would eat Mitch alive if left in there alone. They are long, athletic, and built like men. The white guy is a load but also mobile. Can drive it and finish with either hand. Good post moves. No chance Mitch can hang with them. This is the Preston / Desousa dilemma.
Saving grace is they play horrific interior defense and our guards far out class TX guards. But the need for Silvio grows more critical every day.
-
Thx for the insightful synopsis. Think of me as the choir.
