Seven Point Fix: Free Your Mind



  • @KansasComet Does Coach Self get credit for the successes? Do you credit him for the 2008 title?



  • @HighEliteMajor we did have glimpses of good D, Duke, Texas at home, OU at home, WV at home, Baylor. Our zone offense was good against Baylor. The only time I like a zone is against a quick team that gets to the rack easily. Once you get by one man in a zone, the zone breaks down and should be easy to score on. I like the zone to keep teams out of the paint. If they have good 3 pt shooters (plural) IMO, zones are worthless, unless a box and 1 or triangle and 2, but for short periods. Seeing the games when we played good M2M tells me we were capable of doing it ALL the time! I call it heart! Always respect!



  • @HighEliteMajor ease up on comet! I like his/her responses! So do you think Self should or shouldn’t get credit! It’s a team, he’s part of it!



  • @HighEliteMajor Yes, he put the team together. There was some luck involved in the 2008 title run. Davidson had the game winning shot in the air.



  • @Crimsonorblue22 That’s pretty funny … the one time we played good zone offense was against Baylor. You see cause and effect, I’m sure.

    Personally, I think we could have played sufficiently effective man to man if Tharpe just never played. He was the worst defensive player I have ever seen at KU under Self, in the second half of the season.



  • @HighEliteMajor I don’t remember any teams playing zone other than Baylor, only mentioned that cause we played good D on them. They didn’t stay in it to long cause it didn’t work. Not funny to me! Who beside Stanford do you recall us struggling against a zone. I don’t remember.



  • @KansasComet But Self gets no credit for strategy, scheme, leadership, etc.? I would say that he gets a huge amount of credit for that.

    On luck, just throw that out the window. The bigger your sample size, the less it means. Luck is just probabilities and possibilities. And many times, you create your own luck. When your sample size increases, it’s a discernible pattern.

    Trey Burke’s shot was lucky by many accounts. But if we foul before he shoots, are we victims of a lucky shot? Same with Calipari and Chalmers’ shot. You create luck many, many times, or situations where luck can beat you.



  • @Crimsonorblue22 I thought you were referring to Scott Drew’s inability to coach a competent zone D, as @icthawkfan316 referred to (and as has become legendary).

    Many teams played zone against us – it destroyed us early, Villanova, Florida, Colorado, etc. Then we saw it quite a bit during the league season. I recall Texas killing us with zone at Austin. They mixed it up.



  • Here’s an article I saw on Steve Fisher switching to a 1-3-1 zone this season when needed – as firm a man to man guy as there is. Its a great commentary on flexibility. This is all that I would ask of coach Self, or of any coach.

    http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/Mar/09/sdsu-basketball-zone-defense-fisher-hutson/



  • @HighEliteMajor I thought floridas press killed us, more than half court zone. Don’t you think we improved from those early season losses against zones?



  • @HighEliteMajor I do like a 1-3-1 w/wigs on top, super long athlete.



  • @Crimsonorblue22 Right, Florida pressed, and slipped back into a 1-3-1 much of the game.

    I do think we improved vs. the zone. Marginally vs. the press.

    See – 1-3-1. Wigs up top, allows you to hide your point guard on the back line or weak wing side depending on match-up. Fit us to a T. Right on there.

    Heck, Self likes the 3-2. Go Tharpe/Wigs/Selden up top, bigs in back. Trap wing and box. Matchup on all high % shooters. Immediate closouts everywhere. Roll behind closeout. Has to be better than 150th or whatever in points per game allowed. Has to be.

    How many breakout dunks does Wigs have from up top, middle on a 3-2?



  • @HighEliteMajor how many guys can we hide?



  • @HighEliteMajor you asked a question on successes. Next you import strategy, scheme, and leadership? It was a yes or no question? Right?



  • @HighEliteMajor

    If the problem is the dribble penetration into the paint, then a “pack it in” zone is preventative simply because it limits open space in the middle and increases it on the perimeter. It also limits the amount of space that you ask your most vulnerable people (Perry, Naadir) to cover.

    Our defense was not good last season, but it wasn’t the initial penetration per se that hurt. With Embiid in the back, isolated dribble penetration can always be dealt with. What hurt was after the initial dribble penetration. The kick outs, the dump offs, the secondary drives. We were terrible stopping what happened after the initial penetration.

    Yes, “zone gives you help.” So does man. When the ball is on the wing, there are just as many people in the paint with man as with zone, at least when played effectively. I’m not convinced a zone gives you more help than a good man to man does. What role do you see Perry and Naadir playing in zone that addresses their man to man limitations?

    As an aside, Perry does not challenge shots above the rim but he is OK on-ball when he’s guarding his own position as a 4.

    Yes, we should have beaten Stanford, just like Arizona should have beaten every Pac-12 team after their injury. Michigan State was more talented than many of the teams they lost to, too. The injury to Embiid counts for something. That injury happened at the very end of the season! The offense was stagnant in part because guys weren’t used to playing together without Embiid on the court. Tarik is great, but he is a very different type of player than Embiid. Traylor was great, but he played many more minutes. Those types of things affect other players and their comfort on the court.



  • @HighEliteMajor BIG QUESTION: You’ve done your usual outstanding job in presenting stale-prevention playstyle evolution. But my only question is this: Could the lack of execution, especially the defensive fail-jobs by Naadir and Ellis be a logic error in our supposition that “the system is bad” or “needs revision”? What if Self simply makes a g-dd–n example out of Naa & says “you dont play if you cant play D”. Just like he did with Elijah Johnson, who couldnt keep his man in front of him (compared to Brady). Maybe its time for Naa to ‘ride pine’, while better defense-instincts Mason and Frankamp get to play 20-25mpg as each other’s subs?

    System breakdown needs to be traced to its root cause, right? I hate to sound like your Self soundbite “we didnt execute…”, but the fact is, when we do execute his system to a national top10 level, we win in astonishing fashion. And when we dont execute that way, even in a single game (think UNI, VCU…), we are ripe to get beat, because we are playing below our system’s requirements.

    General comment for those new to KU and Self basketball: SelfBall Principles:

    1. Play D. Top10 FG% D. D always travels. Keeps you in a game when your offense is struggling.

    2. WIN the possession battle: limit t.o.'s, get steals, win the rebounds.

    3. High%looks: Its why we will always be inside-first (but just as a general philosophy). The lob-dunk is a ridiculously high% play, which Im sure Stan VanGundy figured out after his shock at seeing an actual college team dedicate actual practice time to several plays for lob dunks. Skilled bigs and stickback bigs are high% looks. As is an “open look 3, by a trusted shooter”.

    I would like to go a bit counter-thread here, just for the sake of advancing our overall discussion…and actually defend Bill Self by saying he is NOT as rigid as he is made out to be. Evidence:
    -Abandons some of set offense in 2012, as TRob doubled, and Withey not polished enough to create, and has Tyshawn “just drive it”. Bill Self went dribble drive. Either he did it calculatingly, or Tyshawn just got so good at it along with a high70sFT%, that we survived with that playstyle. It suited his personnel. -We do kick out for 3att often enough to have decent 3att for most games. Clearly he has NOT told players to NOT shoot, as we saw Mason try them early and often, then become more selective. I think Self’s msg on 3s is dont force them up early in a possession, especially if rebounders arent set…that’s just playing the percentages/smart basketball. You can of course argue that if we chucked them early and often, we would have the element of surprise, as opposed to the last 6sec of the shot clock, when everybody knows a forced, highpressure 3att is coming. One of the MAIN common issues in the UNI and VCU losses were the dismal KU 3%, and by very trusted senior shooters (Sherron 0-6, Reed 1-7). Sherron had a green light from Day 1, and Reed likely did also. I have NO doubt Jacobsen’s supposed lack of structure in allowing his UNI players to shoot 3s whenever/by whomever made an impression on Self. I mean we saw Mason, Embiid, Ellis, Frankamp, Selden, Greene, Wiggins, AW3 all attempt 3s. Now the harder part: recall that many of those looks were early, but that is OK if the shooter is wide open. Open-look 3s have ALWAYS been accepted and encouraged by Self. I’ve seen that throughout the years, different sets of players, to realize it IS a part of his system, and he doesnt discourage open-look 3 attempts. You cannot face savant shooters like Heslip, Forte, Keiton Page, Kevin Durant and not think that you couldnt/shouldnt “free up” your own shooters. I think Rush and Chalmers always had the greenlight, just as frosh Sherron did since day 1 in 2007. Even RussRob had the greenlight, hitting the opening KU points with a corner3 vs UNC in the Final4. You know EJ and Tyshawn always had greenlights, as did Releford. Teahan also had a green light. Selby certainly did.

    -Experimenting with zones and trapping. I think Self may be more rigid on his m2m defense, as “you gotta get really good at one thing” (which we did not achieve this season). Duke is also a decidedly m2m team. With all the limits on practice time by the NCAA, it is a very real decision coaches have to make as to how to spend their limited practice time. But clearly we DO have zone and trapping “pkgs” to use situationally. Now if Self wants to throw a changeup D every 3 possessions, all game long, that’s his perogative.

    So, feel free to armchair QB any coach, anywhere, anytime. Me personally, I just want to see solid, tough, efficient play and improvement in all the major areas, as by KU standards, this last season was THE worst team KU has had since 2006, statistically speaking.

    Who knows what Self has up his sleeve for 2014-15, other than opening a can of Cliff-X-Tuff on everybody…and lets not forget K.Oubre, who might be a god-fearing kid, but fears nothing else, as he tried to dunk on Cliff in the final seconds of crunchtime, winning the game on the FT line. We need that attitude. Works best in Self’s system. We know this already…



  • @ralster great post! Only disagreement would be on Conner’s defense. Pretty shaky, along w/a few others! I have a hard time figuring why it was so bad.



  • @ralster You are right on point with your question: “But my only question is this: Could the lack of execution, especially the defensive fail-jobs by Naadir and Ellis be a logic error in our supposition that “the system is bad” or “needs revision”?”

    I am not suggesting that man to man is a “system fail.” With the 2013-14 Jayhawks, man to man defense netted a subpar result.

    The fail-jobs by Tharpe and Ellis lead to the conclusion that the system has to be more flexible. If you have square pegs, it is a “system fail” to continue to pound them into round holes. That is really my conclusion.

    I simply suggest that Self open his mind to the possibility that strict man to man is not the only answer all of the time.

    However, I do disagree with your statement: “We do kick out for 3att often enough to have decent 3att for most games. Clearly he has NOT told players to NOT shoot.”

    Self plainly has told players not to shoot. Ever see Greene turn down an open look three? Many times. Why? Because it was early in the shot clock. A trained dog on a leash. Do the wrong thing, you get yanked – like a dog on a leash. Pretty soon, you are skiddish and you won’t think of doing it. Self wants the three point shot to be a later option to getting a “better” shot. The “feed the post” mantra. You don’t disagree with that, right?



  • @jayhawk12 “Our defense was not good last season, but it wasn’t the initial penetration per se that hurt.”

    We are not on the same page. That statement ignores the entire season. You conclude the problem was that “We were terrible stopping what happened after the initial penetration.”

    Penetration creates opportunity, passes, getting fouled. EJ, Taylor, even McLemore were much better in stopping penetration. CF and Mason were better than Tharpe. You simply can’t expose your post players to having to bail out your point guard who can’t stop penetration. You get fouled up – see Black. Many of those were after Tharpe’s guy got in the lane. If you want to try and explain away that, then I’m sorry, it’s hard to discuss it. You ask any coach what’s more important, he’ll say stopping the penetration in the first place. You will have a certain % of times when there is penetration of course, but you can’t give it up over and over. When you do you are creating too many opportunities. It’s hoops 101.

    I read your last paragraph and it reeks of “apologist.” With that approach, you can explain away everything. I say very firmly that the Embiid injury means nothing … zero … when playing Stanford. We should beat Stanford in that situation. Period. But we got outcoached, plain and simple. Dawkins had the superior game plan. His defenders contested nearly every shot, as Self conceded. We did not have an answer to get open shots. Game, set, match. You are right, “we should have beaten Stanford.” To fall back on the Embiid injury is embarrassing, to be honest.

    No Embiid vs. Florida, or another stout team? Sure. Makes sense. Not Stanford.



  • @KansasComet I had asked “Does Coach Self get credit for the successes? Do you credit him for the 2008 title?”

    You had said yes, he put the team together.

    I then responded by asking if he gets credit for scheme, strategy, etc.

    What I mean is, wouldn’t he then get the blame too for failures? It’s legit to say he shares the blame, right?

    I have not seen anyone dispute that Self got outcoached vs. Stanford. It happens. Sometimes getting outcoached is having the wrong personnel on the floor. Sometimes not adjusting. Against Stanford, Self permitted Stanford to execute its game plan without any real strategic interference. Best he can do is try to improve like everyone else in life.



  • @ralster Thank you! That sums up my thoughts. Very well said. I think there are some that want to fix what ain’t broke. Looking forward to next season!



  • @HighEliteMajor I believe he shows up to the press conferences after every game. Win or lose. It starts with the Head Coach. Now, for my question. Is it right to say “I don’t want Wiggins”, and then say “forget everything bad I said about Wiggins”, only to flip again when the end result is not realized? That’s not cool. But somehow, I am sure that is Coach Self’s fault for recruiting a one and done?



  • @HighEliteMajor

    I’m not saying initial penetration doesn’t matter. Of course it does. Yes, it is the most important thing. BUT reducing all of the defensive issues to Tharpe’s failure to prevent dribble penetration absolves everyone else of responsibility. There are no binarys here. Other people are somewhat responsible. The timing of Embiid’s injury mattered some. You have to acknowledge those things.

    Defensive statistics are team statistics. They measure your ability to play together effectively as a group. FG % defense most directly measures shot quality. As soon as someone gets by Tharpe, it becomes the team responsibility to rotate. Failure to challenge a shot after that point falls on someone else. Failure to fulfill that responsibility means that others are - to some extent- responsible. In that way they contribute to poor FG% defense.

    Of course the guard that allows penetration makes it harder for everyone else to play good defense. Is it fair? no. But it is the reality. And it is the responsibility of everyone to help. In addition to being a weaker on-ball team than others Self has coached, we were also weaker making rotations. We had six freshmen come in. 5 of them played significant minutes. In retrospect, it’s no wonder they didn’t play together as well as the 2011 team.

    As an aside, I agree that Tharpe’s defense hurt Black more than others. But again, you can’t absolve Tarik completely. Perry and JoJo are better at challenging shots without fouling. That is not Tarik’s strength. Naadir increased Tarik’s exposure to fouls, but Tarik still committed each and every one of them.

    It is clear we disagree about the importance of Embiid’s injury.



  • Do you think you can’t do both in practice? I think other teams do. UK was younger and obviously did

    @HighEliteMajor I absolutely think you can do both. But your point was that we go “all in” on zone, which I took to mean we practice that instead of M2M. So say in a season we spend 90-95% of the time practicing M2M (which is my guess as to how much time we spend on M2M), going “all in” on zone would mean spending 90-95% on zone in practice. That is what I wouldn’t want to do. I’m on record as wanting more zone, but not ever as the primary defense taught.

    And no, PG play wasn’t the primary reason we lost to Stanford, although Self stubbornly going with Tharpe for far too many minutes in the second half certainly contributed. But to get to the national championship? I could see if Self abandoned Tharpe all together, then and only then would PG play not be an obstacle that we eventually would be unable to overcome.



  • @HighEliteMajor

    " @drgnslayr - “And every team is unique and strategy has to fit their uniqueness so they can become most effective.”

    With a system coach, talent adapts to system. It is a key consideration in why, possibly, we don’t seem to get the most out of our talent. "

    Over my lifetime, I bet I’ve had 100 or so arguments about this subject. You are right, system coaches force their system. And they should recruit specific players that fit the system and know what they are signing up for.

    I believe in it to the point where a team can improve if you adjust to what players you have. At that point, you should do whatever you can to produce the best outcomes. This is especially important with OADs… because making them endure bad play won’t teach them anything they can later come back and use because in a few months they are gone.

    Seems impossible to expect consistent positive results from non-4-year players if the coach is going to be a pure system coach. Self definitely fit the description over his history. But in recent years he has adapted his own rules to fit situations… primarily, OADs.

    My question: will he continue to come off his rigid coaching style? Myles Turner will not fit in his hi/lo except on occasion. If Bill wants Myles to become a Jayhawk, doesn’t he realize Myles skills primarily involve him facing the basket, not back to the basket? He would do Myles a great disservice by forcing him to play most of his time back to the basket. It won’t help him get drafted high, and it won’t be his game in the NBA.

    And then… how would Bill ever hope to land a player like Thon Maker? He’s preparing to go after him big time.



  • @drgnslayr Turner said he liked Selfs hi lo, he could play both.



  • @drgnslayr

    Kansas Turner says: “I like the high-low system that Coach [Bill] Self runs, due to the fact that I can play both the high and the low. Playing in that system with Cliff and a couple of other bigs over there, that would be pretty cool to be a part of.”



  • @HighEliteMajor Totally agree that Self ought to show more flexibility…I was simply trying to point out that he seems to show more flexibility lately (but definitely didnt convert over to predominant zone).

    2 ideas:

    1. Maybe Self didnt have to be so flexible in the past, simply because the execution of TheSystem was adequate, and gave better results? (why change what already is working?)

    2. The other idea is that if Self ever went to zone-D predominantly, and starts practicing it–> what happens to the young’uns being brought up in the System? They start having to focus on zone-D (in the limited practice time the NCAA gives us)…and in 1 season, we have altered the developmental ‘pipeline’…and basically turned our whole program into a zone-D program? That’s a bigtime ramification, HEM, and my friendly thought is that its why Self wont wholesale change his base D, as that will alter the teachings to 2-3 years worth of kids?

    On another note, count me “IN” on the push-the-pace tempo forced by quickly inbounding the ball by anyone off a made bucket. It would give a few more chances for our athletes to get out in transition, which we always seem to be waiting to do…but the D sucked and we hardly got steals, strips. The glimmer of hope was when Embiid blocked something, we still were able to take it and run with it. Kids do that in h.s. I agree it would give us another factor to control the game. Put some more fouls on the opponent…



  • This season, simply because of the huge influx of newbies, we simply were NOT good statistically in key areas. Our FG% defense sucked like a KS tornado. Our 2nd shot defense was awful. We didnt have over half of 2008’s offense installed and usable and well-rehearsed. Remember, the 2008 experienced squad absolutely demolished zone-defenses…(same coach), what was the difference?



  • @ralster nice posts!



  • @HighEliteMajor I’ll dispute it for you. Stanford 0-9 from 3 point range. Zero percent. Could Coach Self’s defense possibly do any better than that? By the way, we knocked down 5. Andrew Wiggins did try to get involved. 4 turnovers, and I believe they were all traveling violations. He scored on at least one of those, basket disallowed however. That’s another potential 12 points of offense right there. The quick whistle stifled him, not Stanford defense. 58 shot attempts and only 18 Free Throw attempts for Kansas, 47 shot attempts and 26 Free Throw attempts for Stanford. We missed a lot of layups. How is that Coach Self’s fault? I am sure this team has worked on layups all season long. It happens? 15 fouls for Stanford, 22 for Kansas. Was the game called evenly? I was there, and I don’t think so. Every single time KU tried to get something going, a whistle changed the momentum. Now, keep in mind that when Coach Self makes decisions in the heat of battle, with thousands of screaming fans, that has an immediate impact on the game. He is not afforded the opportunity to go grab a beer, or a shot while complaining to his significant other about the state of Kansas Basketball and what needs to happen. His life is not that easy. He is the Coach of the Kansas Jayhawks and does a damn good job at it. Switching to a zone defense? If it was that simple…



  • @Crimsonorblue22

    " @drgnslayr Turner said he liked Selfs hi lo, he could play both."

    I think he’s been sold the idea that Cliff will anchor the hi/lo post and he’ll see some movement around it… and he will get a bit of it just to build his tool box.

    Remember Jeff Withey? Myles is a lighter version of Jeff. Even in Jeff’s senior year, he couldn’t do much in the hi/lo. I’m not saying Myles can’t do it or can’t learn to do it, but he won’t be getting drafted in the No Boys Allowed league to play with his back to the basket. He’d have to put on 50 lbs of solid muscle (mostly in his lower body) to dominate in the league doing that.

    And why should he be doing that? He should be out exploring all areas on the floor and learn to score everywhere. That will be his ticket to the next level, not low post play.

    Still… it is a good thing for him to play some low post. Some… limited.



  • @drgnslayr hmmm Jeff Withey, sounds familiar!



  • @Crimsonorblue22

    He had areas of his game that could stand improving… but, dang, I miss him on D!



  • @drgnslayr if it’s the same guy I’m thinking of, he ended this season on a good note! Saw a recent pic, he’s look pretty darn smooth! Great kid, deserves the best!



  • I wonder if playing M2M versus zone defense impacts recruiting top tier talent?

    Calipari tries to run M2M most of the time, and just keeps zone around to use at times.

    Playing M2M in your one year of college seems like a smart thing to do since it’s about all you play in the NBA. Though, in reality, they often play a hybrid defense that hedges away into zone areas.

    @HighEliteMajor - what are your ideas on that? I know you would like us to recruit just below those potential OADs. Obviously, Self seems to like to recruit those players now. What do you think… would it impact Self’s success at recruiting those players?

    Anyone else have an opinion on that?

    Could it be that now Self is committed to nailing all these top players and it is also shackling him into playing only M2M?

    Everyone in here knows I’m not a Calipari fan… but he does seem to be learning more flexibility with his game. Perhaps more than Self.

    Maybe it is just the fact that Calipari has been landing these top players more often and so has had more time to adjust around having all the short-term players.

    Funny… it looks like Cal will only lose Randle and Young for next year. Kentucky appears to be the team to beat. But they will be vulnerable to any team that can manufacture a guard tandem like UCONN had. That’s what it will take to stop Kentucky… unless they run into bad luck, like injuries.



  • @drgnslayr see ralster’s post.



  • @drgnslayr Very interesting post, much to discuss. M2M has its proponents and diehards, chiefly Bill Self, Mike Kryzyewski, and a whole host of lesser known coaches. Then there’s the zoner’s: Boeheim, Scot Drew, and a few 1-3-1 guys…

    Personally, I think playing M2M, but then having a few changeups-Ds in our bag of tricks is the way to go. I think the major problem with our team this year, is that we were incompetent (or better term is “spotty”…) with our OWN base defense. That’s not going to get it done, folks.

    @KansasComet: raised a very interesting synopsis of the Stanford game. I told people after that game, that we actually defended fairly well, we shot the 3ball ok, and only had 13 turnovers for the game…right at our season avg. So why the loss? MISSED SHOTS IN THE PAINT. Traylor is normally a 70% FG shooter, but he missed a lot. Recall that 2 nights before, he WAS the hot hand vs. EKY, going 18 and 15. Ellis, god love him, has problems scoring against length, and Stanford had that disciplined 6’10, 240lb senior clogging the paint. And poor Ellis, god love him, isnt an above the rim player like Thomas Robinson. Nor does Ellis have Robinson’s intense inner fire, that you could see in the plays that Robinson made. TRob exuded swagger and toughness. He was as much a Man in the paint as Cole Aldrich was.

    Summary: Boil the Stanford loss down to: didnt make our high% looks in the paint. The FT discrepancy and foul-calls thing is always debatable, although seems to be a factor, as @KansasComet pointed out. Frank Mason would have had 6 more assists than he did if shots actually fell…I think Frank is getting the big pix. His teammates didnt make him look very good, and some of that happened to Naa (Nuu) this whole season (Tharpe looked pretty good last year playing with a bunch of veteran seniors, and actually improved his 3% this season…but OMG the defense.)



  • The other idea is that if Self ever went to zone-D predominantly, and starts practicing it–> what happens to the young’uns being brought up in the System? They start having to focus on zone-D (in the limited practice time the NCAA gives us)…and in 1 season, we have altered the developmental ‘pipeline’…and basically turned our whole program into a zone-D program? That’s a bigtime ramification, HEM, and my friendly thought is that its why Self wont wholesale change his base D, as that will alter the teachings to 2-3 years worth of kids?

    @ralster This is exactly the point I’ve been trying to make, perhaps more eloquently made by yourself. The long term ramifications of making an “all in” switch to be a zone team for one year. From me, a day ago:

    “we’ve essentially taken a year off where we didn’t teach the fundamentals of intense, in your face M2M defense to a very young team. So be it this next season, or in 2 years, you’ve lost perhaps the most important year to teach your core defensive philosophy to rotation guys like Selden, Greene, Mason, Frankamp. I think the underlying reasoning here should be that you never make an “all in” switch for a single season, regardless of personnel.”



  • @icthawkfan316 Yep. And it only makes the case that in recruiting, a system coach should target and market to attract guys that will flourish and buy-in to his approach. Everyone knows if you go play for Izzo or Coach K or Bill Self, you are going to play tough, you will play m2m D, and you will play team-oriented ball. If you dont want that, you go elsewhere. There should be NO regrets on either side. Its a calculated business decision. I mean its a HUGE decision on bringing the right kids in. I think Self has done an admirable job at it.

    Me personally, I got spoiled totally watching Russell Robinson + Chalmers wreak absolute havoc on defense, which then ignited those transition breaks and highlight reel plays Jayhawk fans always loved. More competent D results in more of those “patented KU 20-2 runs” that seem to put the game away. Notice how we rarely put anybody away this season? Notice how we couldnt play lock-down D even in our own (sacred?) gym against SDSU?

    The recurring mental imagery of Bill Self/KU basketball burned in my brain by repetetive dominance of execution is RussRob or Sherron in that defensive stance, right after a made-dunk by KU. Right there pestering the opposing guard. In your face.

    As HEM & I have said…recruit the 10-50ish ranked guys…guys who thus WILL stay 2+yrs, and keep that pipeline flowing. Top50 athletes are top-level athletic types too, think of Thomas Robinson, Tyshawn, Elijah, RussRob, Greene, AW3. But they stay longer, which it should be clear, is what we need.

    I cannot wait to see Yr2 of Selden, Mason, Greene, and more mpg for Lucas, AW3, Traylor. The whole enchilada gets better, top to bottom. Fate robbed us of seeing Yr2 of Embiid, very sad to say, as that kid was absolutely special.



  • @drgnslayr You mention Kentucky and Calipari. I agree that he seems to be at the forefront in adapting what he does to tailor to (so he can cater to) the OAD. The most interesting thing is that the Harrison Twins have decided to return to KY for another year. I mean that is BIG. And hugely to their credit.

    Make no mistake: BOTH Bill Self and Calipari have said they favor a 2AD rule. Even the most elemental coach knows that experienced athletes are more competent and consistent than inexperienced athletes. Plus it cuts the recruiting-wars stress in half for Calipari, and lessens it somewhat for Self, who only needs 2-3 good players every season, unlike Calipari, who needs 4-5 every season, and 4-5 so good that they are capable of starting from Day 1 (basically top10-15 guys). Calipari looked like he aged 10yrs this season (added to last year’s RobertMorrisExperience).

    I actually rooted for KY once they beat WSU as it was almost a joy to see freshmen actually come together and “get it” as a team–maybe because KU was facing similar struggles. As Self said, Selden “gets it”…but other team members lagged. I think Wiggins got “it”, and Mason really came around. Frankamp understood ball protection, although he had an ugly t.o. when he got tripped in the backcourt, gave up a gift layup. No worries, he’ll get better.

    Back to KY, my respect for the Harrisons went up a lot, I saw how disconnected they were to start with…but if their Tourney run was a sign of their turning the corner…man, keep an eye on KY next season (just as an analytical royalty program observer, hehe…).

    RCJH



  • @KansasComet I agree with the explanation of the Stanford game. We missed a lot of bunnies and that’s hard to pin on Self. We actually did adjust in the second half offensively. We were much better getting the ball to the high post to Tarik and Jamari in positions where they had space to get to the rim.

    I will disagree a bit with @icthawkfan316. 10-50ish guys are still athletic but there’s a noticeable difference between that level and OAD level talent. I think about the 2011 final against Kentucky. We struggled with length that game too, including T-Rob, missed a ton of short shots. I struggle to remember another KU game where the “athleticism deficit” seemed as big as it did during that game.

    Agree about Calipari, though. You could see the recruiting took a toll on him. He can’t keep that up and has said as much.



  • @jayhawk12 I don’t think you’re disagreeing with me. I’m not opposed to recruiting top 10 talent. I wouldn’t want a team built around them, but as pieces to complete the puzzle they are fine.



  • @HighEliteMajor Your phrase to jayhawk12 about our “lack of zone offense cost us against Stanford” is 100% correct…and for the sake of fellow Jayhawks understanding the main issue of this team: Inexperienced execution. Tharpe’s D gets no pass, but his offensive execution depended on frosh being in the right place also–> a problem poor Nuudir didnt have the previous season playing with seniors…I mean, we all thought he could have been IN the game vs. Michigan as a 2nd ball-handling guard to help EJ (& EJ’s body of work makes that a debatable need, going into the Michigan game. He wasnt known as a t.o. machine, nor a 10sec violator). Recall a little bit of a trap early vs. Stanford…and Tharpe passes it to the scorer’s table. Was there supposed to be a KU guy in that position, that didnt make the same read?

    Zone-offense incompetence just killed us. I mean 3-4 of our losses were to teams that played zone D against us–recurring theme. Man, I knew after SDSU and Villanova, that we’d get tested by any team that had a zone-D pkg installed. Why not? Bill Self’s kids are young newbies, and obviously dont have it figured out. We were not the 2008Champs with the entire Self-catalogue of zone-busting plays in-place, were we?

    2013-14 Jayhawks were a shell of a product. Half-baked. Raw. Not competent in some key Self-system areas. Ripe for a Tourney loss. If you cant figure out how to beat what they are throwing at ya, you’re done. Self knows. But the player’s recognition of, and execution thereafter is the variable not only for each player’s understanding, but also as a team…with guys needing to be on the same page, at the same time. No one going to help Nuu, will result in a t.o., very similar to WR and QB on the same page as the “hot read” on a blitz. Just like Jared Sullinger in a Withey/TRob trap in the post…Sully didnt know what to do. We got 3-4 t.o.'s off of that. Embiid learned to pass out of double teams, while pressure caused Ellis (as a soph) to give several “gift” turnovers. Absolutely maddening.

    Maybe the biggest tell-tale sign of a youthful team’s fans needing to “cap” their expectations a bit is the whole idea of moving target incompetencies. First we cant attack a zone. Then we cant defend. But then we can defend against Texas in a jekyll-hyde turnaround. But then we cannot beat smallball IowaState in the BigXII Tourney without Embiid…then the zone offense thing finally fells us, eventhough we played decent D, and hit 3s, while Stanford hit NO 3s. When you cant trust what kind of team will show up night to night, its a sign of inexperienced frosh inconsistencies.

    All this stress unfortunately caused Self to gain like 20lbs (it seems). Stress-induced cortisol-effect wt gain is the worst kind. I worry for the man, he’s my guy, dont want anybody else… At least, in one sense, our season ending early put an end to that level of stress. Now if we just get the Turner Saga-Drama to end on Apr.30, we can focus on all our pieces for next season. Self gets not only a fresh start, but has a critical mass of experience in his returnees. And Cliff + Kelly DO possess tough, aggressive on-court personalities. Just exactly what we need to sprinkle in to our mix.



  • @ralster

    "The most interesting thing is that the Harrison Twins have decided to return to KY for another year. I mean that is BIG. And hugely to their credit.

    Make no mistake: BOTH Bill Self and Calipari have said they favor a 2AD rule. "

    I hate to admit it, but I actually give a ‘hats off’ to Calipari for getting a big chunk of his team back for next year. They will be tough to beat… but I’m always glad to see kids stay in school, and it says something to his relationship with his players that they give up the quick cash to come back.

    And it sounds like they will be carrying a chip on their shoulders to get it done next year. That is something we should have had in 2013… when we were stocked with seniors and the best shot-blocker in the country. We should have had something to prove after finishing runner up the year before. To this day I still can’t believe no one made a single peep about finishing 2nd the year before.

    I’ll never understand why we didn’t put it together in 2013. I know fingers point to EJ… and he definitely cost us. But we should have been a more-dominant team that year. We definitely didn’t have the best offensive players over other years… but we should have been able to lock down defense and win a championship. That was before the NCAA decided to hamper lock down defense with their rules adjustments.

    There is a good chance we will have a TAD system in place within 3 to 4 years. The new NBA commish… Silver… promised it was his priority to bump the age up a year for incoming players. And he mentioned bringing the NCAA with him to iron out the details within the league.



  • @drgnslayr the only reason the twins are coming back is because they dropped so low in the draft, or they would be gone. jMO



  • Two main items:

    1. I have not suggested that we go to zone primarily as an overall defensive philosophy. However, if our personnel are so incompetent at man that to have a chance to win a national championship in a particular season, we have to go zone primarily, then we should. I said it back in late November. In the last 11 or 12 seasons, no team had given up as many points per game as KU and won a national championship other than UNC in 2005 and 2009 (I went off defensive ppg ranking to take into account rule interpretation changes). As some of you may recall, I advocated a change offensively to begin the tourney because, with such a poor defensive team, we had little chance to advance unless we simply outscored opponents (pace of game, etc.). I just ask that Self include zone as many other coaches do in his approach, much like he did in 2008 when we won the title. Other coaches find time; we can find time. Other coaches use it – heck, Calipari changed the entire momentum of the NC game shifting to zone.

    2. Please, folks, don’t live under the delusion that “missed bunnies” were the reason we lost to Stanford. This is a red herring. Don’t believe that it was out of Self’s control. I’ve posted on this before. Coach Self, after the Stanford game, said that most shots were contested and that the "The majority of them we missed, length really affected us."

    Again, we can say we missed shots. But it is a coach’s job to use scheme and strategy to get open shots. Look at what Wiggins said:

    This from a KU sports article - “Wherever I went I saw three people. They were keying in on me,” said Wiggins, who, like the rest of his teammates, struggled against Stanford’s 1-3-1 and 2-3 zones. He was guarded by 6-7 Josh Huestis the times the Cardinal played man. "Whenever I went right, I saw three Stanford guys. Whenever I went left I saw three Stanford guys. That’s no excuse. You are supposed to find different ways to score and different ways to get your teammates involved. I failed to do that tonight.”

    Wiggins didn’t fail. Coach Self failed. Dawkins kicked his ass. The brilliance of Johnny Dawkins was nothing more than he looked at what other teams did to beat us, added his personal twist based on his personnel, and put his team in a position to win.

    Somehow, not only was Wiggins locked down, but our bigs had their shots contested too.

    Self with the patented excuse after Stanford: “It’s a little bit different pressure,” said Self, who fell to 7-2 in round of 32 games. “We’re a young team, and we certainly played young.” Of course, UK was young too.

    Another link about our stagnant offense, and another observer noting how Stanford’s zone stopped Wiggins.

    http://www.sbnation.com/college-basketball/2014/3/23/5539692/andrew-wiggins-march-madness-2014-stanford

    It is simply a cop out to say that our shots didn’t fall, and to defend Self as if he had nothing to do with it makes no sense in the face of the evidence. Ask yourself, what did coach Self do to help KU, strategically and schematically, to win vs. Stanford?

    One thing - using the press, finally, at the 10 minute mark.

    I say finally because Stanford didn’t have a point guard. No, not like us – they didn’t have a solid primary ballhandler. But Self waited until the 10 minute mark to press?

    This is exactly what I’m talking about.

    This is not arm chair quarterbacking. This is simple. It is something that your local high school coach would exploit.

    And before you give Self more of a pass, remember, he chose to start Naadir Tharpe vs. Stanford. Let that sink in.



  • @drgnslayr I think the issue with EJ’s 2013 Hawks were that they had Withey (220lbs) and Kevin Young (180lbs) in the paint. And frosh Ellis. NO BRUTE FACTOR. And I’ve spoken ad nauseum of there being a lack of a 2nd athletic combo guard to play alongside EJ. EJ needed Tyshawn, and both made each other better.

    Stated another way: Why was there no “chip” on the shoulder with EJ’s final team? --> Because the aggressive and emotional heart of the team departed when Thomas Robinson and Tyshawn Taylor departed. Never-say-die attitude that only died after the Kentucky game was over. Personally, I will never forget the heart and fight in those 2012 RunnerUp Jayhawks, and shall root for each of those guys forever, just like I will for the 2008 guys. Special teams! Special chemistry. Recognize when its there, and realize when its not there.



  • @HighEliteMajor What is the easiest shot to make in the game of basketball? A layup or a dunk. Last I checked 2 missed bunnies would equal 4 points. We lost the game by 3 points. The game tying shot was in the air. Selden scored 2 points. Isn’t he a starter and a 5 Star recruit. Perry Ellis scored 9 Points. Isn’t he a starter and a 5 star recruit. Black had a great game with 18, but he fouled out with 5 minutes remaining in the game. Not much he could offer Coach Self in crunch time? Yet, you continue to focus on Wiggins and Self. This is a successful basketball team. A team that I support, good or bad, win or lose. To refer to my beloved Jayhawks as “so incompetent”? Really? No excuse for that. They are transitioning from boy to men. A process that I thoroughly enjoy watching. You say “Dawkins kicked Self’s Ass”. Again, 3 point game, tying shot in the air. Never saw a 3 point Ass Kicking.

    No one is giving Coach Self a free pass. I see effort every year from Coach Self. Winning the Conference 10 years in a row is a special feat. I am sure he is more upset about losing in the tournament than I could ever be. Does it do anyone any good to complain about lack of a zone defense in late April? I doubt it. By now Coach Self has moved on to next year’s team like he should. It is afterall his job to Coach the Kansas Jayhawks Basketball Team. If you are not on the bench, in the heat of battle, it is Arm Chair Quarterbacking.

    “Of Course UK was young too”! I thought with you, it was Championship or Bust? Which is it? UK lost, they did the same thing our 2012 team did. Made it to the Championship game based on a lot of late game heroics, but in the end they lost. I will take my chances with a Bill Self coached team. I like the program he has built here at Kansas. I think we will have another exciting ride and I am looking forward to it. Feel free to cheer for all the other teams you speak so glowingly of.



  • This has been another ripping good read.

    It distills to:

    a) keep playing m2m with very rare junk zones, because it has gotten us 80% winning, 10 league titles, and a ring;

    b) play some m2m with a lot more aggressives zones, because some teams that have won more rings have done tis;

    c) no one is really saying go the Full Boeheim and zone all the time with some very rare m2m.

    Folks are overlooking a real defensive innovation of this past season that may change the game.

    It involves switching between two zones, or switching between zone and m2m during a single possession. Let’s call this “Morphing Defense” to avoid the confusion with switching m2m defense.I never saw any offense handle morphing defense well. Its tricky to defend this way, but to me it is the way to go on defense under the new rules. Here is why.

    Under the new rules, offense is now more than ever a game of shoot the trey, drive the lane for high percentage 2 and a FT, or alley-oop for the 100% two.

    Morphing defense nearly ends the alley-lop, because you cannot tell when they are going to morph on you wreck the timed play that requires offenders to know where the defenders are going to be to time the pass and the jump.

    Morphing defense may be even harder on driving the lane, because the driver no longer knows when the lane he is looking at is going to morph out of existence.

    The morphing defense also is problematic for trifectation, because it confuses curl screens and ball screens to get open looks for treys. And these are the two most popular ways other than kick outs to get open trey looks. Morphing defense also makes the kick out shooter at least uneasy whether the defensive recovery will be m2m or not.

    I am so bullish on morphing defenses that I want to see morphing defenses used end to end. I want every defensive possession (note: I introduce the notion of a defensive possession here to convey the idea that we possess the MOFOs on defense, not just the ball on offense) to start in a 1-1-1-2 alignment before the ball is about to be inbounded. As the ball is inbounded sometimes maintains 1-1-1-2, sometimes morphs into 1-2-1-1, other times into 2-2-1, other times m2m. Once half court is reached it falls into a m2m that morphs into a zone, or vice versa. Some times it morphs 5 seconds,sometimes it morphs every 10 seconds, sometimes just once.

    The goal is for the offense to have make one or two defensive reads in full court, then one or two defensive reads in half court. I am pretty convinced that no D1 offense can impose its offensive game on that much defensive morphing. The offense is outside its comfort zone the entire 40 minutes of play. The pressing does not need to be balls to the wall all of the time. Sometimes high pressure, sometimes not. The game is to disrupt with misrecognition and spike the TOs and the “discomfort” level.

    Morphing defense is THE END of offensive players getting in zones. It is the end of OAD offenses ever winning the disruption stat unless they play morphing defense, too.

    I’m happy with Self’s system as it is.

    If I were UConn’s fans I would be happy with what Calhoun and Kevin Ollie Ball.

    If I were a UK fan, I would be happy with CalBall.

    If I were a Duke fan, I would be happy with ConsonantBall.

    But all of these offenses are going to get wrecked by morphing defense.

    The bizarre elegance of morphing defense is that even its breakdowns ensure recognition problems for every kind of offense being run.

    The calculus of morphing defense goes something like this. They can’t effectively attack what they cannot read effectively. Defense always has the edge in morphing.

    Frankly, I am amazed Self has not gone to this long before. His junk 3-2 is a very limited form of morphing defense itself.

    I can usually come up with a counter for any defense, but morphing defense is an absolute bitch to counter.

    There will be one.

    But we could win a lot of games before it is figured out.


Log in to reply