Revshare
-
https://apple.news/AkB5OvUTqSkyuewFsHejqDg
3 year fully guaranteed contract. Finally.
-
@dylans huge
-
Think that’s the first guaranteed deal? All the stories I’m reading so far are vague, but making it sound like it’s a large deal, but not the first fully guaranteed.
The deal is believed to be one of the largest fully guaranteed revenue-share agreements in college football history under the recently approved federal settlement that allows college programs to pay their athletes directly
-
I’m curious what this does to the world of college agency. Might this finally put an end to less-than-professional agency representation still present in college sports?
-
Hopefully NIL so it doesn’t count against Revshare. I suppose that’s the goal to get as much NIL approved outside of Revshare to boost coffers.
-
The Big East doesn’t have to split revenue sharing with football. Big12 commish has major competition for best b-ball league with a hand tied behind his back now.
-
@dylans Not a significant advantage. The Big East is only expected to allocate about $5.7 million for basketball per school. The Big 12 is expected to be at about $4.3 million per school for basketball. It’s not a game changing difference.
-
lol. Let’s see UConn’s budget before thinking that’s real.
-
lol. Let’s see UConn’s budget before thinking that’s real.
It’s a projected average per school and unlike the rest of the conference, UConn has an FBS football program and they still have to fund as well from their revenue sharing.
Also, this money gets distributed among all athletic programs, not just football and basketball. Several of those schools also participate at a high level in hockey and have to share money with those programs as well.
-
I can’t see your comment, but I assume you disagree. -
So you mean to tell me, if you were athletic director of a big east school, that you could find no competitive advantage in Revshare for basketball? I’d fire you instantly. That’s pure insanity. There is a lineman that signed a 5 mil 3 year deal (aTm I believe) - I’m betting KU could get another high level b-ball player for that amount of cash. And one high level starter is essentially 20% of the team. I’d see that as a big advantage that I could use personally.
-
Also I think the money coming from the university instead of NIL has big implications too. They’d essentially be employees of the university with very limited input.
-
@dylans Don’t reply if you aren’t going to bother reading the reply and making a response based on that instead of the stuff you commented.
-
I found this read interesting. It centers around B12 football but surely has implications for basketball, too. It seems that schools like TT have adopted quickly using their big dollars on front loading. Also interesting how HS NIL is growing.
-
Sounds like KU is broke! Any contracts before July 1 didn’t count against revenue sharing and I don’t recall any big deals being announced above and beyond the 20.5. Funding must be an issue. Rut row raggy
-
@drgnslayr said in Revshare:
I found this read interesting. It centers around B12 football but surely has implications for basketball, too. It seems that schools like TT have adopted quickly using their big dollars on front loading. Also interesting how HS NIL is growing.
Texas Tech doesn’t think the revenue limits are going to hold up under scrutiny and are going to overspend chasing a football national title.
-
KU keeps things close to the vest on NIL. They’re going to hit the revshare cap easily and Goff said yesterday they’re adding scholarships. On the Big East thing, fine they’ll have more RevShare for basketball but none of them are good on NIL. Any school like KU can easily compete in terms of a total financial package. On UConn, they’re going to spend a lot more than most on women’s basketball as well. KU is well positioned to compete, though being in the Big 12 vs. the P2 is still a significant disadvantage. It would be a heck of a lot easier to hit the revshare cap with an additional $40m in tv revenue.
