Referee-Determined Outcomes or Thrown Games?



  • @ralster Credit “The Pelican Brief” and who stood to gain from taking out the two members of the court. It was Matice and his oil money.

    Everybody was calling out UCLA when they got in the dance. To their credit they won games, but the first one against SMU? How many people follow San Diego St. Or UC Irvine?

    I would hope it isn’t so, but this one just screamed FOUL.



  • @Statmachine

    There is no Pasadena Post. It’s a fraud site selling us on fraud. Doesn’t mean some of that information isn’t true.

    Concerning fixing games:

    Surely it must happen sometimes. There are just too many games played in this world to have all of them clean from tampering. The obvious reason to fix a game is the game is on a booking board. Second… that it’s spread enough to collect a decent pot of gamblers. All of D1 fits in these requirements.

    The fact that no proven cases have appeared in several decades indicates that if it is happening, the culprits are very careful and very capable. This means carefully vetting officials and carefully interviewing them to find the right opportunities. No one that isn’t directly involved can know this is going on. Why? Because if prison time isn’t hanging over your head, eventually you will talk.

    Could someone like WWW pull this off? Highly unlikely. He may be a scumbag, but he doesn’t have the same kind of infrastructure a mob crew has. To pull something like this off, you need to have insurance. You need to know if someone suddenly looks like a snitch, you can take care of the situation, by any means necessary. The only situation where I see someone like WWW being able to pull this off is if he has direct ties with a syndicate. Those ties would have to be connected with blood. Like I said earlier… the penalties in a case like this could far exceed most murder cases. Most likely, feds watch a guy like WWW. Or at least, they notice if he suddenly is seen with mob figures.

    Even involvement of the mob doesn’t guarantee success. We know that from the NY point shaving scandal from the 50s.

    But if you jump down to basketball below college… there is major fixing going on every day. I mentioned before playing on tournament teams. We’d go to a bunch of small towns and typically win their tournaments. But sometimes we’d face some very crooked officiating provided by the tournament organizers. Their crooked whistle would become apparent when we play the local teams. Gotta pull for those local boys!



  • @jaybate-1.0 I didnt see the UK game against UCinn. Or the other one. But I did read very intently about the SMU game. Seems to me that someone didnt want Larry Brown at 77, coaching a mid major team SMU to beat a holier than thou UCLA program. But wait, didnt LB coach UCLA before he got to KU? I dont know JB, I think there is some shady stuff going on in our favorite sport. It does not make me happy.



  • @HighEliteMajor It was not long ago, just recently in fact, I read on ESPN some piece on legalizing sports betting for College ball, outside of Vegas. Refs affecting game out comes, and some write up on legalizing sports betting? Can’t prove it but it can’t be coincidence.



  • @Lulufulu

    I suspect there may still be some bad blood between the NCAA and SMU, dating back to Mustang football and their death penalty. There is a lot to that story… including some likely bad blood between SMU and other southern universities.

    States legalizing pot, college sports gambling… what’s next, legalizing prostitution?



  • @drgnslayr Wooo hooo! Legalize it! LMAO



  • @Lulufulu

    Look at all the “sin taxes” it raises!!!



  • @drgnslayr HA! Like syntax! Thats a good one 😉



  • @JayhawkRock78 But, technically, the refs made the right call. The fault, if there is a fault, lies with the SMU player that made a bad play. Sorry, I’m not buying the conspiracy stuff on that game.



  • @Hawk8086

    What is the rule that says a shot falling outside the cylinder cannot be rebounded by a defensive player or grabbed and dunked by an offensive player? Just curious?



  • @jaybate-1.0 Judgement call by the ref…as to whether it has a chance to go in. Does anyone think that the ref could say…“Ok end of game, here’ smy chance…I’ll make this last call that screws SMU” JB…I love ya man, but you’re whipping the board into a conspiracy frenzy. Just like I said to HEM one time…you remind me of Lardass in Stand by Me…you get the crowd going and then just sit back and watch the havoc that you have wrought. Next, I suppose you’re going to tell me that Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone…I mean he did learn how to shoot like that in the Marines! 🙂



  • At least reviewed?



  • @jaybate-1.0 I should have said…judgement as to whether it is outside the cylinder.



  • @Hawk8086

    That’s what I figured. 😄

    It was completely out of the cylinder. Not even close. So far outside the cylinder that 3 refs calling the game from the cheap seats would have seen it. The burden is on you to prove how three guys could blow the call. 😄

    You know, I love you too, and I am soooo used to raising issues that folks have not looked from certain angles and hearing the conspiracy scare card played and then having what I raise become conventional wisdom within a year or so that I just don’t worry about it any more.

    Oooooh, conspiracy!

    Conspiracy boo!

    😀



  • @jaybate-1.0 Judgement part of the rule was bad …but not as obvious as you say…especially without the benefit of replay.



  • Then replay it! Doesn’t happen that often, wouldn’t slow the game down. It was a bad call!



  • @Hawk8086

    MORE obvious than I say. I saw it clearly on TV before the replay at a worse angle than any of the refs had. And I was just a kiddy game ref.



  • @jaybate-1.0 I can see why they would initially see that a part of the ball was within the cylinder…



  • @Crimsonorblue22 Was that type of play reviewable?



  • No, need to change it, bet they do after that call.



  • @jaybate-1.0 There is not a doubt in my mind that Bookies, Television Networks, & Select Referees work in unison and/or independently to control certain outcomes of some games.

    People just laugh it off with “conspiracy theory” talk.

    People would have called the ShoeCo topic a conspiracy until Pitino outed them.

    If a fan so much as brings up referees having an impact on the outcome, they are almost immediately ostracized. This, in and of itself, has allowed for the referees to hide behind their wrongdoings.



  • @Hawk8086 said:

    Next, I suppose you’re going to tell me that Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone… Edit: The JFK Report will be released soon in 2017.



  • @Blown Let me know what that says…



  • @Hawk8086 It’s going to say: If you can’t win by yourself, then cheat to win. Signed, LBJ.



  • If you are watching Duke they just got a call that will benefit them greatly! Sucked



  • @Crimsonorblue22

    I’m watching them now… some painful officiating. They swallowed their whistles on the Utah end.



  • Really bad call!



  • @drgnslayr wrights 3rd call, horrible



  • @Crimsonorblue22 easy peasy now duke is already up by 10.after that bogus call



  • @Blown Never understood the conspiracy theories behind LBJ, nothing sticks. Great book out there by Gerald Posner called, “Case Closed.” One of the great points of the book is that it’s so hard to accept that such a consequential human being could be killed by such an inconsequential man. So we look for a deeper meaning behind the murder, a conspiracy if you will. Perhaps that’s the same reason we Kansas fans hurt so much when we lose to the likes of UNI, VCU, and WSU! How can the great Kansas basketball program fall to these guys??



  • I’m trying to decide if I’m supporting the typical “Duke officiating” in a Duke vs UK game.

    I’d kind of like to see Okafor foul out every footer on UK and get them down to a small team… forcing the twins to play in the post.

    Wouldn’t that be fun to watch! Finally… a fun UK game!

    I’m not a Duke fan but I’d like to see someone spoil the squids team of trees.



  • @VoyagingJayhawk nuleaf needs to pick that book up for his summer reading!!



  • @drgnslayr I can’t support Duke either!



  • @Crimsonorblue22

    But you have to pick… Duke or UK… who is it going to be?

    I’ll take rat face over the squid any day of the week!



  • @drgnslayr not there yet!!



  • Hey, we’ve all seen Utah come back when down big at half haven’t we? This is far more manageable. Keep fightin’ Utes!



  • @VoyagingJayhawk that bad called killed them!



  • @Crimsonorblue22 I agree with ya, that was just awful.



  • Fouled sucked on Spangler too!!!



  • Just switched to the OU-MSU game. Lot of defensive breakdowns for Michigan State, Oklahoma taking advantage. Hope they represent the Big 12 well and make a push.



  • @VoyagingJayhawk Me too. And, Utah is 5 down at the half to Duke. Box score says Okafor is having problems with Utah’s size.



  • @drgnslayr Doesnt UK have to fly in a plane to their next game? just sayin…



  • @VoyagingJayhawk I respect your opinion. This is such a divisive topic, that will likely never have all truths publicly revealed. I’ve read thousands of pages of literature on the subject, and have come to my own strong opinion just as you have. The important thing to me is that as long as it’s not resolved I keep an open mind to both sides of it.



  • @Blown In my experience it’s become a very addictive subject of study! The feeling is mutual, always respect those opinions that differ from yours! Just need DC and Topeka to do the same.



  • @Lulufulu did you see Winslow celebrating his 3 and get beat down court? Instant bench by me!



  • @Hawk8086

    You seem interested in conspiracy. You have used the term, whereas I have not… I confess I am not up to speed on conspiracies. They are so tough to substantiate, especially If done by pros, that I don’t think about them much. What is the point?

    But since you appear interested in them and in JFK, the citizen in me, who has never read systematically about this subject–but have lived with a sad memory of my grade school teacher weeping and telling our class that our beloved President had died from being shot, plus the recollection a day or so later of watching Jack Ruby gut shoot Oswald who had claimed to be a patsy live on TV–has to ask you something.

    Didn’t the Church Committee Investigation and hearings end the discussion of whether there was a conspiracy in the JFK. assassination long ago? I thought all the debate since, which I have never followed closely, had been about how many shooters there were, 1 or more, and who hired them? Right? Holy cow! Did I misunderstand the Church Commitee all these years? I kind of stopped thinking about it much after that, figuring any conspiracy capable of whacking our President and getting away with it for a decade was likely never going to be found out.

    Do you know some binding government inquiry since the Church Committe that proves some thing different? I don’t keep up much with this stuff. The last thing I recall was a non binding but seemingly credible National Geographic inquiry I read in a doctor’s office a year or two ago that concluded unequivocally that JFK was assasinated by a conspiracy and probably by more than one shooter, if I recall correctly.

    You sound informed about Oswald and the JFK assassination. Has there been some new binding government finding I have missed? Or do you think National Geographic AND the Church Committee are lying, or involved in conspiracy?

    I tend to trust the Church Committee and all these years later the National Geographic.

    But I haven’t read systematically all these years to reach a fully informed opinion as you perhaps have.

    If you say I have missed something, then I reckon it would be my duty as a citizen to read up on this issue further.

    Rock Chalk!



  • @Crimsonorblue22 That absolutely cracked me up. I’d like to think 90’s Coach K benches him but he also pampered Laettner so perhaps not. By the way, that 30 for 30 almost made me hate him more. I’ll admit I have a secret respect for Coach K though.



  • @jaybate-1.0 Never heard of Jack Ruby claiming to be a patsy, in fact he took a much more righteous position and claimed to have killed Oswald out of pure patriotism and moral obligation; for our country and Jackie and her children. I know most don’t want to see this conversation on the boards so I’ll try and keep it short. I equivocate the ‘Kennedy conspiracy’ with the ‘9/11 conspiracy.’ So many people like to moan about the inefficiency of our government and the total dysfunction that plagues it. Yet, when it comes to these conspiracies that could only have been elaborate and complex in nature, our government agencies and employees somehow morph into a highly effective and secretive bureaucracy. I don’t buy it. You kill Oswald, then you have to kill Jack Ruby, and the man who killed Jack Ruby, and so on and so forth. The logic doesn’t add up. Not to mention, Oswald’s feat of two well-aimed shots out of three in 9 seconds was not miraculous and totally in the realm of possibility for any average Marine rifleman.



  • @drgnslayr said:

    @Crimsonorblue22

    But you have to pick… Duke or UK… who is it going to be?

    I’ll take rat face over the squid any day of the week!

    The TV does not need to be on at that point.



  • Maybe the NCAA has an agenda about who should NOT advance in the tournament. I read that Larry and Roy are both gonna be on the hot seat now that they’re through with Boeheim.


Log in to reply