Hahaha. @HighEliteMajor , you are certainly modest, I’ll give you that. But, I do not see the contradiction. Bill Self said "nor are we aware of any third-party involvement to do so.” There has been nothing to come out to contradict that claim.
Mike Brey recently told The Athletic, “I never thought of it like that. If there’s money changing hands, then yeah, they’re a booster, but I don’t think any of us look at the support we get from sneaker companies and think of that as violations. They’re giving us information to help close the deal (with recruits). Every one of us works the shoe company angle to help us get players,” Brey says. “I speak to those guys as much as I would speak to parents. No question if there was an Under Armour event somewhere, I’d get a call from someone at Under Armour saying, ‘Hey Mike, did you see this 15-year-old kid in Dallas? He’s in our program, you gotta get on him.’ I’m not saying they’d cheat to get him, but damn right they’re helping, absolutely.”
Bill Self is claiming that the NCAA never said that you couldn’t talk to shoeco reps about recruits, that every other coach does it, the NCAA knows they do it, and they have never said that’s impermissible. There is no evidence that he was aware that the shoeco companies were influencing recruits with impermissible benefits. You could say, “Bill Self is not dumb, he knew what was going on” but there is no evidence that he was aware or any evidence that he was encouraging the shoeco reps to take those actions. Now, there is nothing on tape where Bill Self or Kurtis Townsend said, “We need to do whatever it takes to get this guy within the framework of NCAA rules,” and that’s the only thing that I could see as shaky as far as a lack of institutional control. We don’t know if they have had those conversations or what their relationship is like. But when Kurtis Townsend is on tape saying that, we don’t know that he means “we need to do whatever it takes (to get Zion), including offering impermissible benefits” or if he means “we need to do everything we can under the letter of the law.” And considering that Zion went elsewhere, it seems safe to assume that KU didn’t pursue illegal benefits. I’m sure they could have found someone with deep, deep pockets to bring Zion to KU for a season, or at least match Addidas’s financial offering.
In this case, Addidas was acting out of it’s own best interest, and I wouldn’t doubt that other shoeco reps are as well. But there is no evidence that Bill Self and TJ Gassnola had implicitly aligned their business interests together through impermissible benefits." You could assume or imply that they did, but there is NO evidence.